【摘要】：收入分配一直是社會(huì)各界普遍關(guān)注的熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題。多年來(lái)，我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)快速發(fā)展，但居民收入增長(zhǎng)緩慢，居民收入差距居高不下。黨的十八大報(bào)告正式提出2020年城鄉(xiāng)居民人均收入比2010年翻一番的目標(biāo)要求后，各地政府紛紛出臺(tái)倍增計(jì)劃，理論界也對(duì)此做了廣泛深入的研究，，似乎社會(huì)各界對(duì)“收入倍增”已經(jīng)有了全面深入的認(rèn)識(shí)和理解。其實(shí)各地政府的倍增計(jì)劃多是停留在經(jīng)濟(jì)層面，在數(shù)字上對(duì)城鄉(xiāng)居民人均收入做足文章；而理論界大量的研究還停留在從一般意義上探討居民收入的數(shù)字倍增，雖然有人提及過(guò)居民收入的翻番要注意福利的增加，但提得很不全面也不具體，不僅沒(méi)有明確從福利的視角對(duì)其進(jìn)行解釋?zhuān)矝](méi)有從福利的視角分析實(shí)現(xiàn)“收入倍增”的制約因素和具體路徑。文章從福利的維度對(duì)“收入倍增”的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行了豐富和完善，并從福利的視角對(duì)實(shí)現(xiàn)“收入倍增”的制約因素和具體路徑進(jìn)行了嘗試性地較全面的分析。 文章以福利的視角為切入點(diǎn)，以科學(xué)發(fā)展觀(guān)和福利經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)為理論基礎(chǔ)，在借鑒已有的研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上，提出“收入倍增”的真正內(nèi)涵不只是一般意義上的收入數(shù)字倍增，更應(yīng)是福利的倍增。福利維度的“收入倍增”是在居民實(shí)際收入翻番基礎(chǔ)上的福利翻番。從福利經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)理論出發(fā)，福利視角的“收入倍增”存在幾個(gè)主要影響因素，分別是經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)情況、收入分配狀況、社會(huì)保障體系建設(shè)以及政府發(fā)展理念。然而，結(jié)合中國(guó)正處于社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期的現(xiàn)實(shí)狀況，實(shí)現(xiàn)福利視角的“收入倍增”還存在以下制約因素：經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展方式未能真正轉(zhuǎn)變，經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展受到挑戰(zhàn)，實(shí)現(xiàn)居民“收入倍增”的基礎(chǔ)還不牢靠；收入分配制度改革進(jìn)展遲緩，居民收入差距仍然很大，實(shí)現(xiàn)居民“收入倍增”的關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié)還沒(méi)攻破；社會(huì)保障制度不健全，社會(huì)保障水平總體低下，還沒(méi)筑牢實(shí)現(xiàn)居民“收入倍增”的后盾；一些政府發(fā)展理念轉(zhuǎn)變不到位，使得實(shí)現(xiàn)居民“收入倍增”的主觀(guān)障礙還沒(méi)掃清。因此，實(shí)現(xiàn)福利視角的“收入倍增”就要求：切實(shí)轉(zhuǎn)變經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展方式，實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)的健康持續(xù)發(fā)展，夯實(shí)物質(zhì)基礎(chǔ)；深化收入分配制度改革，縮小居民收入差距，攻破關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié)；完善社會(huì)保障制度，提升社會(huì)福利和個(gè)人福利，筑牢堅(jiān)強(qiáng)后盾；切實(shí)轉(zhuǎn)變發(fā)展理念，貫徹落實(shí)科學(xué)的發(fā)展觀(guān)，掃清主觀(guān)障礙。
[Abstract]:Income distribution has always been a hot issue of general concern from all walks of life. For many years, our country economy develops rapidly, but the resident income growth is slow, the resident income disparity is high. After the report of the 18th National Congress of the Party formally put forward the goal of doubling the per capita income of urban and rural residents in 2020 compared with 2010, local governments one after another issued doubling plans, and the theorists also made extensive and in-depth research on this. It'seems that all walks of life have a thorough understanding of double income. In fact, most of the doubling plans of local governments have stayed at the economic level and done a sufficient number of articles on the per capita income of urban and rural residents. However, a large number of studies in the theoretical circle have also stayed at the number of people's income doubling in a general sense. Although it has been mentioned that the doubling of residents' income should pay attention to the increase of welfare, it is far from comprehensive or specific, and not only has it not been explained explicitly from the perspective of welfare, Nor has it analyzed the restrictive factors and specific ways to realize "income multiplication" from the perspective of welfare. This paper enriches and perfects the connotation of "income multiplication" from the perspective of welfare, and analyzes the restrictive factors and specific ways of realizing "income multiplication" from the perspective of welfare. Based on the perspective of welfare and the theory of scientific development and welfare economics, this paper puts forward that the real connotation of "income multiplication" is not just the multiplication of income numbers in general sense. It should be a doubling of welfare. The income doubling of welfare dimension is the doubling of welfare on the basis of the doubling of residents' real income. Based on the theory of welfare economics, there are several main influencing factors in "income multiplication" from the perspective of welfare, namely, economic growth, income distribution, social security system construction and the concept of government development. However, in view of the fact that China is in a period of social transition, there are still the following constraints to the realization of "income multiplication" from the perspective of welfare: the mode of economic development has not really changed, and the sustainable development of the economy has been challenged. The basis for realizing the "double income" of the residents is still not firm; the reform of the income distribution system is progressing slowly, the income gap of the residents is still very large, the key link of realizing the "double income" of the residents has not been broken through, and the social security system is not perfect. The level of social security is generally low, and it has not yet established a firm support for the realization of the "double income" of residents; some government development concepts have not changed in place, so that the subjective obstacles to realizing the "double income" of residents have not been cleared. Therefore, the realization of "income doubling" from the perspective of welfare requires: changing the mode of economic development, realizing the healthy and sustainable development of the economy, strengthening the material foundation, deepening the reform of income distribution system, narrowing the income gap of residents, and breaking through the key links; Improve the social security system, promote social welfare and personal welfare, build a strong backing, change the concept of development, implement the scientific concept of development, clear the subjective obstacles.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F124.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫永勇;;論社會(huì)保障制度與國(guó)民福利水平[J];長(zhǎng)江論壇;2008年01期

2 黃思寧;;日美兩國(guó)居民收入與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展協(xié)調(diào)增長(zhǎng)及其對(duì)北京的啟示[J];調(diào)研世界;2012年03期

3 許慶明;試析環(huán)境問(wèn)題上的政府失靈[J];管理世界;2001年05期

4 徐勇;;推進(jìn)我國(guó)城鄉(xiāng)居民收入倍增的對(duì)策建議[J];發(fā)展研究;2012年07期

5 江建平;張?jiān)铺?;實(shí)現(xiàn)江蘇居民收入倍增計(jì)劃之重點(diǎn)、難點(diǎn)問(wèn)題研究[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)探討;2012年01期

6 張車(chē)偉;蔡翼飛;董倩倩;;日本“國(guó)民收入倍增計(jì)劃”及其對(duì)中國(guó)的啟示[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2010年10期

7 中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)與宏觀(guān)穩(wěn)定課題組;張平;劉霞輝;張曉晶;汪紅駒;常欣;;增長(zhǎng)失衡與政府責(zé)任——基于社會(huì)性支出角度的分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2006年10期

8 劉暢;;社會(huì)保障支出對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與社會(huì)公平的影響研究[J];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

9 崔新進(jìn);;城鄉(xiāng)居民收入倍增的制約因素研究[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年05期

10 錢(qián)運(yùn)春;;西歐跨越中等收入陷阱:理論分析與歷史經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2012年08期

本文編號(hào)：2122336