本文選題：創(chuàng)新異質(zhì)性 + 經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)　； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：現(xiàn)實(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)中，企業(yè)進(jìn)行創(chuàng)新行為的本質(zhì)是尋求差異，企業(yè)通過創(chuàng)新帶來的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)與生產(chǎn)效率的提高是實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)和持續(xù)變遷的根源。自內(nèi)生增長(zhǎng)理論將技術(shù)進(jìn)步作為經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的來源以來，有關(guān)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的研究一直是學(xué)術(shù)界的熱點(diǎn)。然而“創(chuàng)新同質(zhì)”的客觀假設(shè)條件卻始終是這一理論的缺陷。事實(shí)上，現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中生產(chǎn)技術(shù)的不同、地理環(huán)境的差異、以及企業(yè)文化底蘊(yùn)和要素積累的差距都往往致使不同的企業(yè)個(gè)體表現(xiàn)出明顯的異質(zhì)性。基于此，本文在傳統(tǒng)的內(nèi)生增長(zhǎng)框架中引入“創(chuàng)新異質(zhì)性”，巧妙的結(jié)合宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)理論與微觀產(chǎn)業(yè)組織的相關(guān)理論，研究了基于異質(zhì)性視角的創(chuàng)新活動(dòng)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的影響作用。 本文首先創(chuàng)造性地利用修正后的歐氏距離法構(gòu)建出創(chuàng)新異質(zhì)性的衡量指標(biāo)，將創(chuàng)新異質(zhì)性分為創(chuàng)新投入異質(zhì)性和創(chuàng)新產(chǎn)出異質(zhì)性兩類，，并參照羅默的內(nèi)生經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)理論，將創(chuàng)新異質(zhì)性引入經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)模型。以此為基礎(chǔ)，分別從宏觀層面和中觀層面出發(fā)，運(yùn)用普通最小二乘法、廣義最小二乘法等多種計(jì)量分析方法，對(duì)2000-2012年我國(guó)總體及各工業(yè)行業(yè)的創(chuàng)新異質(zhì)性對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的影響進(jìn)行了實(shí)證研究，并進(jìn)一步實(shí)證分析了創(chuàng)新異質(zhì)性的主要決定因素。研究結(jié)果表明：創(chuàng)新異質(zhì)性在我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展的各個(gè)層面都普遍存在，并且對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)產(chǎn)生顯著的正效應(yīng)。然而，不同行業(yè)的創(chuàng)新異質(zhì)性對(duì)其經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的貢獻(xiàn)度是不一致的。另外，研究發(fā)現(xiàn)：市場(chǎng)集中度和對(duì)外開放程度對(duì)創(chuàng)新異質(zhì)性存在著顯著的正效應(yīng)，而企業(yè)規(guī)模、企業(yè)的所有制結(jié)構(gòu)以及創(chuàng)新融資結(jié)構(gòu)則對(duì)創(chuàng)新異質(zhì)性存在著顯著的負(fù)效應(yīng)。最后基于前面的研究結(jié)論，本文提出了如何利用創(chuàng)新異質(zhì)性提升我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的政策建議。
[Abstract]:In real economic activities, the essence of the enterprise's innovation behavior is to seek differences. The competitive advantage and production efficiency of the enterprise through innovation are the root of economic growth and continuous change. Since the endogenous growth theory takes technological progress as the source of economic growth, the research on technological innovation and economic growth has been studied The objective hypothesis of "innovation homogeneity" is always the defect of this theory. In fact, the difference in production technology, the difference of geographical environment, the difference of enterprise culture and the accumulation of factors often result in the distinct heterogeneity of different enterprise individuals. Based on this, this paper In the traditional endogenous growth framework, "innovation heterogeneity" is introduced, and the theories of macro economic growth and micro industrial organization are ingeniously combined to study the impact of innovation activities on economic growth based on the perspective of heterogeneity.
This paper first creatively uses the revised Euclidean distance method to construct the measurement index of innovation heterogeneity, and divides the innovation heterogeneity into two categories: innovation input heterogeneity and innovation output heterogeneity. Based on Romer's endogenous economic growth theory, innovation heterogeneity is introduced into the economic growth model. From the middle level, using the general least square method and the generalized least square method, the author makes an empirical study on the influence of the innovation heterogeneity on the economic growth in China's overall and the industrial industries in the past 2000-2012 years, and further empirically analyses the main determinants of the innovation heterogeneity. The results show that innovation is different. Quality is common in all levels of economic and social development in China and has significant positive effects on economic growth. However, the contribution of innovation heterogeneity in different industries to its economic growth is inconsistent. The size of the enterprise, the ownership structure of the enterprise and the innovation financing structure have a significant negative effect on the innovation heterogeneity. Finally, based on the previous research conclusions, this paper puts forward the policy suggestions on how to use the innovation heterogeneity to promote the economic growth of China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F224;F124.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 彭恒文;杜運(yùn)蘇;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)效應(yīng)、市場(chǎng)結(jié)構(gòu)及技術(shù)進(jìn)步——基于異質(zhì)性偏好視角的分析[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2010年01期

2 孫曉華;周玲玲;;企業(yè)異質(zhì)性與產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新能力——基于我國(guó)36個(gè)工業(yè)行業(yè)的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2010年04期

3 王凱;馬慶國(guó);;基于因子分析定權(quán)法的中國(guó)制造業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力研究[J];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期

4 朱有為;徐康寧;;中國(guó)高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)研發(fā)效率的實(shí)證研究[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年11期

5 邵云飛,唐小我;中國(guó)區(qū)域技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力的主成份實(shí)證研究[J];管理工程學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

6 解學(xué)梅;曾賽星;;基于分類回歸的企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新影響因素測(cè)評(píng)[J];工業(yè)工程與管理;2009年06期

7 王國(guó)貞;河北省區(qū)域技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];河北科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

8 周經(jīng);劉厚俊;;國(guó)際貿(mào)易、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與我國(guó)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新——基于1998～2009年省際面板數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年11期

9 趙志耘;呂冰洋;郭慶旺;賈俊雪;;資本積累與技術(shù)進(jìn)步的動(dòng)態(tài)融合:中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的一個(gè)典型事實(shí)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年11期

10 郭新力;;技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的區(qū)域性差異研究[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2007年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 林高榜;創(chuàng)新異質(zhì)性與中國(guó)技術(shù)進(jìn)步[D];浙江大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：2110609