發(fā)布時間：2018-06-18 12:12

  本文選題：官方發(fā)展援助政策 + 援助有效性　； 參考：《華東理工大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：歐盟自上個世紀50年代以來一直致力于通過對外發(fā)展援助政策來擴大自身在世界經(jīng)濟和政治舞臺上的地位。目前,歐盟及其成員國是最大的官方發(fā)展援助提供方,根據(jù)歐盟自身的統(tǒng)計,其提供的援助占全球一半以上①。歐盟對外援助發(fā)展至今,其援助政策經(jīng)歷了一個產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展和革新的過程,那么這是怎樣的歷史演變?歷史悠久的歐盟對外援助,其有效性到底如何?受援國在接受援助后,其效果又反映在哪些方面? 本文試圖對歐盟官方發(fā)展援助政策的演變進行整體的分析,通過厘清歐盟對外援助政策的演變、現(xiàn)狀,以揭示其對外援助政策的實質(zhì),得出,冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后,歐盟擴大了其對外援助的廣泛性,重點援助領(lǐng)域也順應(yīng)國際形勢和自身政治發(fā)展的目標,轉(zhuǎn)向援助受援國的民主、體制和環(huán)保等領(lǐng)域。同時其援助的政治條件性明顯化,援助意識形態(tài)濃烈,援助數(shù)量取決于受援國的“表現(xiàn)”,相應(yīng)地,其援助的形式也不僅僅局限在經(jīng)濟援助,加大了人道主義援助、軍事援助等。由此可以窺見其援助的根本在于加強與發(fā)展中國家合作的同時,追求最大化滿足自身利益,尤其是政治利益的需求,加強歐盟作為一個共同體對外的國際影響力。 同時從援助國和受援國兩個視角,分別采用援助的鉆石模型和結(jié)果導(dǎo)向型分析法,綜合全面地研究其援助政策的有效性。從援助國角度分析,本文采用ODA/GNI、贈與指數(shù)、雙邊ODA占比和非束縛性比率這四個指標,綜合反映援助質(zhì)量及變化趨勢,相比2010年,2011年歐盟對外援助質(zhì)量有惡化趨勢,同年相比DAC國家,歐盟援助質(zhì)量也處于劣勢地位；從受援國角度分析,歐盟官方發(fā)展援助的有效性具有局限性和不徹底性。因此綜合而言,歐盟對外援助有一定的成效,同時存在很大的提升空間。最后本文提出歐盟在實施其對外援助時面臨的問題和幾點建議,旨在促進對外援助理論研究,提高對外援助的透明度,最終為我國建立健全對外援助體系提供參考。
[Abstract]:Since the 1950s, the European Union has been committed to expanding its position in the world economic and political arena through its foreign development assistance policy. Currently, the EU and its member states are the largest providers of official development assistance (ODA), accounting for more than half of the global total, according to the EU's own statistics. Since the development of EU foreign aid, its aid policy has gone through a process of emergence, development and innovation, so what kind of historical evolution is this? What is the effectiveness of EU foreign aid with a long history? What are the areas in which the recipient country receives assistance that is reflected in its effectiveness? This paper attempts to analyze the evolution of the EU's ODA policy as a whole, by clarifying the evolution and current situation of the EU's foreign aid policy, in order to reveal the essence of its foreign aid policy, and draw a conclusion that, after the end of the Cold War, The EU has expanded the breadth of its foreign aid, and the key areas of aid are in line with the international situation and its own goal of political development, turning to aid to the recipient countries in the fields of democracy, institutional and environmental protection, and so on. At the same time, the political conditionality of its aid is evident, the aid ideology is strong, and the amount of aid depends on the "performance" of the recipient country. Accordingly, the form of its aid is not limited to economic aid, and humanitarian aid is increased. Military aid, etc From this, we can see that the fundamental of its assistance lies in strengthening cooperation with developing countries, while pursuing to meet the needs of its own interests, especially its political interests, and strengthening the international influence of the EU as a community. At the same time, from the perspective of donor and recipient, the diamond model and result-oriented analysis are used to study the effectiveness of aid policy. From the donor point of view, this paper uses ODA-GNI, grant index, bilateral ODA ratio and unfettered ratio to reflect the aid quality and its changing trend. Compared with 2010, the quality of EU foreign aid has a tendency to deteriorate. In the same year, compared with DAC countries, the quality of EU aid was also at a disadvantage; from the perspective of recipient countries, the effectiveness of EU ODA was limited and incomplete. Therefore, overall speaking, EU foreign aid has certain results, at the same time there is a lot of room for improvement. Finally, this paper puts forward some problems and some suggestions in the implementation of EU's foreign aid, aiming at promoting the theoretical research of foreign aid, enhancing the transparency of foreign aid, and finally providing reference for our country to establish and perfect the foreign aid system.
【學位授予單位】：華東理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F114.46;F746

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孔文;屈曉鵬;;歐盟競爭法中的國家援助:一個經(jīng)濟分析框架[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2007年03期

2 汪艷麗;;對外發(fā)展援助的有效性問題與德國的應(yīng)對[J];德國研究;2011年04期

3 黃梅波;張麒豐;;歐盟對外援助政策及管理體系[J];國際經(jīng)濟合作;2011年09期

4 劉繼業(yè);;歐盟的全球援助體系概況[J];國際資料信息;2010年09期

5 單寧;;“歐盟對外援助”的國際政治學研究綜述[J];高校社科動態(tài);2006年05期

6 周強;魯新;;發(fā)達國家官方發(fā)展援助新趨勢[J];國際經(jīng)濟合作;2011年11期

7 唐麗霞;周圣坤;李小云;;國際發(fā)展援助新格局及啟示[J];國際經(jīng)濟合作;2012年09期

8 李fb昊;;歐盟國家援助法律制度簡析以及對我國的啟示[J];法制與社會;2012年11期

9 王育紅;論國際發(fā)展援助的理論依據(jù)[J];國際經(jīng)濟合作;1992年12期

10 嚴啟發(fā);林罡;;世界官方發(fā)展援助(ODA)比較研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟研究;2006年05期

，

本文編號：2035444