【摘要】：在新型城鎮(zhèn)化的背景下,土地整治是統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展,促進(jìn)耕地資源保護(hù),優(yōu)化土地資源配置,改善生態(tài)環(huán)境的重要舉措。土地整治潛力測(cè)算及分區(qū)的研究,是土地整治規(guī)劃編制的參考和依據(jù)。本研究以哈巴河縣為例,構(gòu)建了土地整治潛力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,采用層次分析法(AHP)和特爾斐法(Delphi)確定權(quán)重,定性和定量分析了哈巴河縣土地整治潛力；基于空間聚類分析方法,進(jìn)行了縣域土地整治分區(qū)研究,并提出了哈巴河縣土地整治方向和戰(zhàn)略,以期為耕地資源豐富區(qū)的土地整治研究提供參考。研究的基本結(jié)論如下：(1)哈巴河縣土地整治潛力較大,土地整治綜合潛力以中南部為主,低潛力區(qū)集中分布在縣北部。其中土地整理中高潛力區(qū)集中在縣域中南部平原區(qū)；土地開發(fā)潛力中高潛力圍繞縣城呈環(huán)狀分布；土地復(fù)墾潛力區(qū)集中在縣域中部丘陵區(qū)。(2)哈巴河縣可劃分為土地綜合整治潛力區(qū)、土地整理重點(diǎn)區(qū)、土地開發(fā)重點(diǎn)區(qū)、土地復(fù)墾重點(diǎn)區(qū)以及低潛力區(qū)等5種土地整治類型,土地整治宜以分區(qū)主導(dǎo)潛力類型作為土地整治方向,低潛力區(qū)則應(yīng)加強(qiáng)生態(tài)環(huán)境保護(hù)。(3)以哈巴河縣為例,探討耕地資源豐富區(qū)土地整治的總體方向：宜以增加耕地?cái)?shù)量,提高耕地質(zhì)量為核心；以農(nóng)業(yè)和畜牧業(yè)為主導(dǎo),推進(jìn)農(nóng)業(yè)規(guī)模化、產(chǎn)業(yè)化發(fā)展；注重生態(tài)環(huán)境保護(hù)。(4)空間聚類方法應(yīng)用于土地整治分區(qū)研究,關(guān)鍵是確定度量準(zhǔn)則,一是定義空間距離,以各評(píng)價(jià)單元的地理坐標(biāo)來代替其地理位置,并綜合考量各評(píng)價(jià)單元土地整理、土地開發(fā)和土地復(fù)墾等潛力值,二是確定權(quán)重,根據(jù)區(qū)域特點(diǎn)確定各評(píng)價(jià)要素權(quán)重。
[Abstract]:Under the background of new urbanization, land renovation is an important measure to coordinate urban and rural development, to promote the protection of cultivated land resources, to optimize the allocation of land resources, and to improve the ecological environment. The calculation of land regulation potential and the study of zoning are the reference and basis of land regulation planning. This study takes Haba County as an example, constructs the land regulation potential evaluation index system, uses analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (AHP) and Delphi method (Delphi) to determine the weight, qualitatively and quantitatively analyzes the land regulation potential of Haba River county. Based on the spatial cluster analysis method, this paper studies the zoning of land regulation in the county area, and puts forward the direction and strategy of land regulation in Haba River county, in order to provide a reference for the study of land regulation in the area rich in cultivated land resources. The basic conclusions of the study are as follows: (1) the potential of land regulation in Habahe County is great, the comprehensive potential of land regulation is mainly in the central and southern part, and the low potential area is concentrated in the northern part of the county. The middle and high potential area of land consolidation is concentrated in the central and southern plain of county area, and the middle and high potential of land development is distributed in a circular way around the county town. The potential area of land reclamation is concentrated in the hilly area of the central county. (2) Haba County can be divided into three areas: potential area for comprehensive land reclamation, key area for land consolidation, and key area for land development. There are five types of land reclamation in key areas of land reclamation and low potential areas. The dominant potential type of land reclamation should be taken as the direction of land regulation, while the ecological environment protection should be strengthened in low potential areas. (3) take Haba River County as an example. This paper discusses the general direction of land regulation in the rich area of cultivated land: increasing the quantity of cultivated land and improving the quality of cultivated land should be taken as the core; Taking agriculture and animal husbandry as the leading factors, promoting the development of agricultural scale and industrialization; Pay attention to ecological environment protection. (4) the key of applying spatial clustering method to the study of land regulation and zoning is to determine the measurement criterion. One is to define the spatial distance and replace the geographical position of each evaluation unit with the geographical coordinates of each evaluation unit. The potential values of land consolidation, land development and land reclamation of each evaluation unit are considered synthetically. The second is to determine the weight, and to determine the weight of each evaluation element according to the regional characteristics.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京林業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F301.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔡運(yùn)龍;中國農(nóng)村轉(zhuǎn)型與耕地保護(hù)機(jī)制[J];地理科學(xué);2001年01期

2 楊建波;王莉;劉潤(rùn)亞;劉震宇;谷頤樂;;我國農(nóng)村土地整治的發(fā)展態(tài)勢(shì)與重點(diǎn)研究領(lǐng)域[J];國土資源科技管理;2012年01期

3 曲福田;;典型國家和地區(qū)土地整理的經(jīng)驗(yàn)及啟示[J];資源與人居環(huán)境;2007年20期

4 李晨;劉新峰;彭哲;司濤;楊林莉;;基于規(guī)劃視角下的省級(jí)土地整治與生態(tài)環(huán)境保護(hù)研究——以安徽省為例[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2012年28期

5 陳國平;趙俊三;張力;吳曉偉;馬娟;葛俊潔;;云南省土地整治分區(qū)研究[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2013年02期

6 高崇輝;蔡湘文;藍(lán)妮拉;;廣西壯族自治區(qū)土地整治生態(tài)環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];國土資源科技管理;2013年02期

7 張頌?zāi)?胡月明;趙元;廖琪;;耕地后備資源評(píng)價(jià)方法研究綜述[J];廣東土地科學(xué);2013年02期

8 楊俊;王占岐;金貴;程丙銀;侯現(xiàn)慧;;基于AHP與模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)的土地整治項(xiàng)目實(shí)施后效益評(píng)價(jià)[J];長(zhǎng)江流域資源與環(huán)境;2013年08期

9 蔡廣鵬;郜紅娟;張幫云;;基于GIS的仁懷市低丘緩坡土地開發(fā)潛力評(píng)價(jià)[J];貴州農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2013年08期

10 劉小玲;張偉;;縣級(jí)土地整治規(guī)劃中土地整治潛力測(cè)算方法研究——以神木縣農(nóng)用地整治潛力測(cè)算為例[J];干旱區(qū)資源與環(huán)境;2014年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張曉平;基于功能導(dǎo)向的西藏土地整治研究[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

2 李建春;銀川市耕地變化與基本農(nóng)田空間布局優(yōu)化研究[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2378058