【摘要】：2003年新一輪集體林權制度改革以來,農戶作為集體林權制度改革的主體,同時也是參與林地流轉市場交易的主體,其流轉意愿影響著林地使用權的流轉。隨著我國山區(qū)經(jīng)濟的快速發(fā)展和城鎮(zhèn)化步伐的加快,農民就業(yè)途徑和收入來源的多元化,形成了不同的農民階層,而不同階層農民的林地流轉意愿可能存在差異。對土地的依賴程度不同,即對林地產(chǎn)權的不同偏好,也可能會表現(xiàn)為林地流轉意愿的差異。本文希望尋找影響農戶林地流轉意愿的驅動因素和限制因素,來促進林地進一步流轉。研究采用浙江省4個縣(市)187戶微觀農戶數(shù)據(jù)進行分析。首先,描述樣本地區(qū)農民階層分化狀況、林地產(chǎn)權偏好狀況和林地流轉意愿狀況;其次,交叉統(tǒng)計不同階層農民的林地產(chǎn)權偏好狀況和林地流轉意愿狀況;最后,采用二元Logistic模型分析農戶林地流轉意愿的影響因素。得到以下結論:隨著山區(qū)經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展和城鎮(zhèn)化的推進,以往高度同質的農民群體已經(jīng)開始分化。農民對林地產(chǎn)權制度的偏好有所不同,大部分農戶認為林地產(chǎn)權是重要的。187戶農戶中,44.92%的農戶有流轉意愿,55.08%的農戶想保持不變,有林地流轉意愿的農戶數(shù)少于想保持不變的農戶數(shù)。有流轉意愿的農戶,其想要流轉的規(guī)模、期限、動因等也有所不同。各職業(yè)階層對林地各類產(chǎn)權的偏好較強。認為林地使用權、林地抵押權重要的,務工階層的農戶占比最高;認為林地收益權重要的,經(jīng)商階層的農戶占比最高;認為林地轉讓權重要的,管理者階層的農戶占比最高;認為林地繼承權重要的,務農階層的農戶占比最高。不同家庭收入水平的農戶對林地產(chǎn)權的偏好較強。且認為林地收益權、林地轉讓權和林地繼承權重要的,家庭收入水平處于下層的農戶占比最高;認為林地抵押權重要的,家庭收入水平處于中下層的農戶占比最高;認為林地使用權的偏好重要的,家庭收入水平處于中層的農戶占比最高。經(jīng)商階層和管理者階層的流轉意愿更強,務農階層、務工階層傾向于保持現(xiàn)狀。愿意流入的農戶中,管理者階層農戶占比最高;愿意流出的農戶中,經(jīng)商階層農戶占比最高。不論家庭收入處于哪個水平,希望保持不變的農戶占多數(shù)。處于下層、中下層和上層的流入意愿強于流出意愿,中層、中上層的流出意愿強于流入意愿。愿意流入的農戶中,上層農戶占比最高;愿意流出的農戶中,中層農戶占比最高。在農戶林地流出意愿影響因素模型中,林地轉讓權偏好強度、人均林地面積對農戶林地流出意愿有顯著的正向影響;與對照組(務農階層)相比,經(jīng)商階層的林地流出意愿更加強烈;與對照組(上層)相比,家庭收入處于中下層的農戶其流出意愿更加強烈;與對照組(上層)相比,家庭收入處于中上層的農戶的流出意愿更加強烈;以永康作為基準組,開化、臨安的農戶比永康的農戶更不傾向于流出。在農戶林地流入意愿影響因素模型中,年齡、人均林地面積對農戶林地流入意愿有顯著的負向影響;以前有過流轉行為的農戶其流入意愿比未曾有過流轉行為的更強烈;與對照組(上層)相比,家庭收入水平處于中上層的農戶流入意愿更弱;開化、臨安和龍泉農戶的流入意愿比永康的農戶更強烈。根據(jù)以上結論,提出以下建議:一是,建立健全林權交易中心,發(fā)布流轉信息。二是,發(fā)展非農產(chǎn)業(yè),提高農民收入水平。三是,尊重農戶的意愿,鼓勵農戶進行林地流轉。
[Abstract]:Since the reform of the new collective forest rights system in 2003, the peasant household as the main body of the reform of the collective forest rights system, and also the main body of the trade in the forest land circulation market, its circulation will affect the circulation of the right to use the forest land. With the rapid development of the mountain economy and the pace of urbanization in our country, the farmer's employment path and the diversification of the source of income have formed different peasant stratum, and there may be a difference between the forest land circulation intention of different stratum farmers. The degree of dependence of land is different, that is, the different preference of forest land property right, may also appear as the difference of forest land circulation intention. In this paper, we hope to find the driving factors and limiting factors that affect the will of farmers' forest land circulation, and promote the further circulation of forest land. The data of 187 micro-farmers in 4 counties (cities) in Zhejiang Province were studied. Firstly, the status of peasant stratum differentiation in the sample area, the preference status of forest land and the will of forest land circulation will be described. The influence factors of farmer's forest land circulation will be analyzed by using the binary Logistic model. The following conclusions are obtained: With the development of mountain economy and the advance of urbanization, the former highly homogeneous group of farmers has begun to differentiate. The preference of farmers to forest land property rights system is different. Most farmers think forest land property rights are important. Among 187 households, 44. 92% of farmers have circulation will, 55. 08% of farmers want to remain unchanged, the number of farmers with forest land circulation will be less than the number of farmers who want to keep the same. The scale, time limit, motivation and so on are different from the farmers who have the desire to flow. Each occupation class has strong preference for various kinds of property rights in forestland. It is considered that the land use right and forest land mortgage are important, and the farmers account for the highest proportion; it is considered that the forest land usufruct is important, and the peasant households in the business class make up the highest proportion; it is considered that the forest land use right is important, the farmer accounts for the manager stratum is higher than the highest; it is considered important to inherit the forest land. The farmers in the farming class make up the highest. Farmers with different household income levels have strong preference for forest land property rights. And it is considered that the income right of forest land, the right of forest land and the inheritance of forest land are important, the household income level is at the lower level, the household income level is higher than the highest; it is considered that forest land mortgage is important, the household income level is at the lowest level, the farmer accounts for the highest proportion; it is considered that the preference of forest land use right is important, Household income levels are among the highest in middle-class households. The turnover intention of the business class and the manager class is stronger, the farming class and the worker class tend to keep the status quo. Among the farmers who are willing to flow into, the farmers account for the highest proportion; among the farmers who are willing to flow out, the farmers account for the highest proportion. Regardless of the level of household income, it is desirable to keep the same farmers in the majority. In the lower layer, the inflow intention of the upper and lower layers is stronger than the outflow intention, and the outflow intention of the middle layer and the middle layer is stronger than the inflow intention. Among the farmers who are willing to flow into, the upper-level farmers account for the highest proportion; among the farmers who are willing to flow out, middle-level farmers are the highest. Compared with the control group, the willingness of forestland outflow was stronger than that of the control group (the farming class). Compared with the control group (upper layer), the farmers whose household income is in the middle and lower levels has a stronger outflow intention. Compared with the control group (the upper layer), the outflow intention of the peasant households in the middle and lower layers is more intense, and Yongkang is used as a reference group and is opened, Linan's farmers are more inclined to flow out than Yongkang's farmers. In the model of farmer's forestland inflow will influence factor model, the age, per capita forest land area has a significant negative influence on the farmer's forestland inflow will. The household income level is in the middle-upper level, the farmers inflow will be weaker; open, Linan and Longquan farmer's inflow will be stronger than Yongkang's farmers. According to the above conclusions, the following suggestions are made: one is to establish and improve the forest rights management system and publish the circulation information. The second is to develop non-agricultural industries and raise farmers' income level. 3. To respect the will of farmers and encourage farmers to carry out forest land circulation.
【學位授予單位】：浙江農林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：F326.2;F832.4

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 徐秀英,沈月琴,萬剛,徐有銀;林地流轉的難點、問題與對策——臨安市林地流轉的調查[J];浙江林業(yè)科技;2000年06期

2 羅運森 ,黎志永;加快林地流轉步伐 促進產(chǎn)業(yè)化進程[J];廣西林業(yè);2003年06期

3 康敏卿;贛州市林地流轉初探[J];江西林業(yè)科技;2004年04期

4 梁澤治;加強林地流轉管理 實現(xiàn)資源優(yōu)化配置[J];湖南林業(yè);2004年10期

5 梁明蓮 ,江明峻;林地流轉的問題與對策[J];廣西林業(yè);2004年05期

6 王飛,萬志芳,于志杰;論國有林地流轉的必要性[J];中國林業(yè)企業(yè);2005年02期

7 樊喜斌;;關于林地流轉問題的探討[J];林業(yè)資源管理;2006年04期

8 祝海波;;我國林地流轉機理及制度思考[J];農村經(jīng)濟;2006年12期

9 祝海波;尹少華;;探索適合我國林地流轉的基本制度[J];林業(yè)經(jīng)濟問題;2006年06期

10 鄧章寧;;海南林地流轉存在的問題及對策建議[J];熱帶林業(yè);2007年04期

相關會議論文 前10條

1 張蕾;蔡志堅;;論林地流轉中的制度失衡問題[A];第九屆中國林業(yè)青年學術年會論文摘要集[C];2010年

2 廖文梅;彭泰中;曹建華;;農戶林地流轉行為影響因素的實證分析——以江西為例[A];低碳經(jīng)濟與林業(yè)發(fā)展論——中國林業(yè)學術論壇·第6輯[C];2009年

3 王耀冬;;關于林地流轉問題的研究[A];林業(yè)、森林與野生動植物資源保護法制建設研究——2004年中國環(huán)境資源法學研討會（年會）論文集（第一冊）[C];2004年

4 季利民;;林地流轉問題的研究與探討[A];第二屆浙江中西部科技論壇論文集（第一卷）[C];2005年

5 蔡志堅;;戶林地流轉行為決策過程模型與假說[A];第九屆中國林業(yè)青年學術年會論文摘要集[C];2010年

6 孟繁民;張書坤;田林江;;寧安市國有林場林地流轉的思考[A];黑龍江省林業(yè)經(jīng)濟學會2004年年會暨第四次學術研討會論文集[C];2004年

7 盛建峰;劉金龍;駱耀峰;;林地流轉糾紛的成因與思考——廣西壯族自治區(qū)南寧橫縣的調研報告[A];第九屆中國林業(yè)青年學術年會論文摘要集[C];2010年

8 孟凡民;李忠義;;寧安市國有森林林木林地流轉試點工作初報[A];第九屆中國林業(yè)青年學術年會論文摘要集[C];2010年

9 杜群;王兆平;;集體林權改革中林地流轉規(guī)范的沖突與協(xié)調[A];生態(tài)文明與林業(yè)法治--2010全國環(huán)境資源法學研討會（年會）論文集（上冊）[C];2010年

10 曹蘭芳;羅攀柱;任偉琳;;林地流轉中林地使用權問題及對策[A];中國林業(yè)技術經(jīng)濟理論與實踐[C];2006年

相關重要報紙文章 前10條

1 陳作華 申有全;林地流轉催發(fā)我市造林生機[N];焦作日報;2006年

2 通訊員 賀劍平;任振鶴到團風麻城督辦林地流轉工作[N];黃岡日報;2007年

3 記者 梁堅義邋實習生 陳攀 馬先軍;新政策助陽新林地流轉[N];黃石日報;2008年

4 記者 成良田邋通訊員 李雪誠;楊芳林林地流轉緊鑼密鼓[N];咸寧日報;2008年

5 特約記者 任建成　通訊員 龍朝輝;嘉魚：林地流轉3萬多畝[N];咸寧日報;2008年

6 記者 成良田　見習記者 朱哲;我市部署林地流轉工作[N];咸寧日報;2008年

7 通訊員 閔勁華;赤壁：農民林地流轉得實惠[N];咸寧日報;2008年

8 阮鳳文 本報記者 劉鳳娟;寧安敲響林地流轉“第一槌”[N];黑龍江經(jīng)濟報;2008年

9 本報記者 朱邪;審議并原則通過《貴州省森林、林木、林地流轉條例(草案)》[N];貴州日報;2010年

10 記者 郭樹勛;龍翔街道：林地流轉多[N];焦作日報;2010年

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 冉陸榮;集體林權制度改革背景下遼寧省農戶林地流轉行為及經(jīng)營效率研究[D];沈陽農業(yè)大學;2011年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 楊松坤;農戶林地流轉行為實證研究[D];浙江農林大學;2010年

2 鄭云青;江西省集體林地流轉中的農戶決策行為與政策優(yōu)化研究[D];江西財經(jīng)大學;2012年

3 李朝柱;農戶林地流轉及對家庭收入的影響研究[D];浙江農林大學;2012年

4 趙娜;林地流轉對農戶林地投入的影響研究[D];浙江農林大學;2012年

5 徐林青;江西省銅鼓縣集體林地流轉市場結構及成因分析[D];北京林業(yè)大學;2015年

6 劉大鵬;不同地區(qū)林地流轉影響因素的比較研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學;2015年

7 嚴俊;南方集體林區(qū)林地流轉研究[D];南京林業(yè)大學;2010年

8 趙海蘭;云南省民族地區(qū)集體林權改革后的林地流轉研究[D];西南林業(yè)大學;2013年

9 李紅慶;南方集體林可持續(xù)經(jīng)營林地流轉政策與機制研究[D];中南林業(yè)科技大學;2009年

10 王飛;國有林地流轉研究[D];東北林業(yè)大學;2005年

，

本文編號：2267439