【摘要】：隨著我國的城市化進程的持續(xù)推進,城市也持續(xù)向外擴張。同時,城市的社會經(jīng)濟活動也不斷影響著近郊以及周圍的農(nóng)村,使其生產(chǎn)方式也在不斷發(fā)生變化,進而促使城鄉(xiāng)生產(chǎn)要素之間進行頻繁的互動,逐漸融合成了一個特殊的微觀經(jīng)濟過渡帶,即形成了城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合部。這一區(qū)域具有比較獨特的社會、自然及生態(tài)特性,也是城鄉(xiāng)用地之間的矛盾最為激烈、土地利用變化最為活躍的地區(qū)之一,存有土地利用效率低、土地供需矛盾尖銳、土地產(chǎn)權(quán)不明晰等的問題。因此,合理利用城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合部土地、加強土地管理和規(guī)劃、提高土地集約利用水平,使其滿足城市發(fā)展對土地的需求的同時不消耗耕地資源,對這一區(qū)域的經(jīng)濟發(fā)展及土地資源的可持續(xù)利用具有現(xiàn)實意義。農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地是指農(nóng)村集體用地中用于農(nóng)業(yè)以外的建設(shè)且用來居住并進行工業(yè)、服務業(yè)勞動的土地。作為農(nóng)村土地利用的重要組成部分,農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地在區(qū)域農(nóng)村發(fā)展中有著重要作用。隨著社會主義新農(nóng)村的建設(shè)及新型城鎮(zhèn)化、農(nóng)村工業(yè)化的持續(xù)進展,一些地方的建設(shè)用地出現(xiàn)了許多新的問題,比如土地閑置浪費、低效利用等現(xiàn)象,這些問題的存在更加激化了其供需矛盾。所以,必須要提高農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地的集約利用水平來解決這些問題�；诮ㄔO(shè)用地節(jié)約集約利用戰(zhàn)略背景下,很多地方前后開展了對城市、區(qū)域、開發(fā)區(qū)及教育用地節(jié)約集約利用評價工作,但農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地及城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合部建設(shè)用地相關(guān)評價尚處于理論研究階段。農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地作為建設(shè)用地的重要組成部分,其集約利用評價的研究不僅可以促進農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地集約利用水平的提高,完善建設(shè)用地節(jié)約集約評價機制,也可以促進城鄉(xiāng)建設(shè)用地結(jié)構(gòu)的優(yōu)化。本文在此背景下,首先在對國內(nèi)外有關(guān)城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合部土地利用以及農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地集約利用進行研究的基礎(chǔ)上,對于城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合部內(nèi)涵以及特征、農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地集約利用的概念及內(nèi)涵進行了總結(jié)。其次,結(jié)合汪清縣實際情況劃分出汪清縣城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合部的范圍,再次,構(gòu)建農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地集約利用評價指標體系,對研究區(qū)的農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地進行集約利用評價研究,最后對評價結(jié)果進行分析并提出相關(guān)的對策建議。在農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地集約利用評價過程中,評價指標體系的構(gòu)建至關(guān)重要。本文在充分借鑒國內(nèi)外土地集約利用評價指標體系的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合汪清縣城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合部各村的實際情況,從土地利用效率、土地利用結(jié)構(gòu)、土地利用強度、土地投入強度、土地社會經(jīng)濟效益5個目標出發(fā),選取了13個具有代表性的評價指標構(gòu)建了農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地集約利用評價體系。在此基礎(chǔ)上,運用層次分析法對評價指標的權(quán)重進行測算,并采用多因素綜合評價法對汪清縣城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合部農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地進行了目標分值及集約度分值的測算,最終計算得出農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地集約利用分值。評價結(jié)果表明,汪清縣城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合部各村的農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地集約水平有待提高,尚有較大的提升空間。本文根據(jù)評價結(jié)果,并對其改善途徑進行探討分析,以提出與實地情況相適宜的建議。當前國內(nèi)農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地集約利用評價的工作還處于試點階段,不管是對農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地的內(nèi)涵還是評價指標都沒有一個統(tǒng)一的標準,而且本文評價對象為城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合部的農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地,其評價是一項較為復雜的系統(tǒng)性研究,很具有挑戰(zhàn)性。因此,這一評價研究不僅僅是一種新的嘗試,也是一種對現(xiàn)有建設(shè)用地集約利用評價研究的補充。
[Abstract]:At the same time, the social and economic activities of the city are also constantly affecting the suburbs and surrounding countryside, so that the mode of production is also constantly changing, thus promoting frequent interaction between urban and rural factors of production, and gradually merging into a special micro-economy. The economic transition zone, that is, the urban-rural fringe, has a relatively unique social, natural and ecological characteristics. It is also one of the areas with the most intense contradictions between urban and rural land use and the most active land use change. There are problems such as inefficient land use, sharp contradictions between land supply and demand, and unclear land property rights. It is of practical significance for the economic development and sustainable use of land resources in this area to strengthen land management and planning in the fringe of urban and rural areas and to raise the level of intensive land use so as to meet the demand of urban development for land without consuming arable land resources. As an important part of rural land use, rural construction land plays an important role in regional rural development. With the construction of new socialist countryside and new urbanization, rural industrialization continues to progress, some local construction land appeared. Many new problems, such as idle and waste of land, inefficient use and so on, aggravate the contradiction between supply and demand. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the level of intensive use of rural construction land to solve these problems. The evaluation of economized and intensive use of land for development zones and education is still in the theoretical stage. As an important part of construction land, the study of intensive use evaluation of rural construction land can not only promote the improvement of intensive use of rural construction land. Under this background, this paper firstly studies the intensive use of land in urban-rural fringe and the intensive use of land for rural construction both at home and abroad, and studies the connotation and characteristics of urban-rural fringe and intensive use of rural construction land. Secondly, according to the actual situation of Wangqing County, the scope of the urban-rural fringe is divided. Thirdly, the evaluation index system of intensive utilization of rural construction land is constructed, and the intensive utilization of rural construction land in the study area is evaluated. Finally, the evaluation results are analyzed and relevant countermeasures are put forward. In the process of evaluating intensive use of rural construction land, the construction of evaluation index system is very important. Based on the evaluation index system of intensive use of land at home and abroad, combined with the actual situation of every village in the urban-rural fringe of Wangqing County, this paper discusses the land use efficiency, land use structure, land use intensity and land input. Starting from the five objectives of land social and economic benefits, 13 representative evaluation indexes were selected to construct the evaluation system of rural construction land intensive use. On this basis, the weight of evaluation indexes was calculated by AHP, and the rural construction land in the urban-rural fringe of Wangqing County was evaluated by multi-factor comprehensive evaluation method. The evaluation results show that the intensive level of rural construction land in the villages in the urban-rural fringe of Wangqing County needs to be improved, and there is still much room for improvement. At present, the evaluation of intensive use of rural construction land in China is still in the pilot stage. There is no uniform standard for the connotation or evaluation index of rural construction land. Moreover, the evaluation object of this paper is rural construction land in the fringe of urban and rural areas, and its evaluation is a complicated system. Therefore, this evaluation study is not only a new attempt, but also a supplement to the existing research on the evaluation of intensive use of construction land.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F301.2

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 施炳良;農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地如何復墾[J];中國土地;2005年09期

2 趙國玲;;簡析整理農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2006年13期

3 朱哲學;吳昱南;;農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地節(jié)約利用調(diào)查和思考[J];學習與實踐;2009年10期

4 俞義;;關(guān)于推進城鎮(zhèn)和農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地“增減掛鉤”的幾點建議[J];浙江國土資源;2010年08期

5 張新國;;新農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地合理利用研究[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟與科技;2012年10期

6 李太淼;;論逐步推進農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地國有化[J];中州學刊;2013年04期

7 林和明;藺中;李金成;;廣東省農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地整治潛力分析與測算[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2013年05期

8 吳濤;孔慶福;易勝果;;農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地復墾效益評價[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2013年15期

9 施炳良;抓好農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地復墾 促進土地資源有效利用[J];浙江國土資源;2005年07期

10 張宇;歐名豪;張全景;;鉤,該怎么掛——對城鎮(zhèn)建設(shè)用地增加與農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地減少相掛鉤政策的思考[J];中國土地;2006年03期

相關(guān)會議論文 前10條

1 歐陽芳輝;;城鎮(zhèn)建設(shè)用地增加與農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地減少相掛鉤初探[A];2010年中國土地學會學術(shù)年會論文集[C];2010年

2 周其仁;;農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地的轉(zhuǎn)讓[A];2012年夏季CMRC中國經(jīng)濟觀察（總第30期）[C];2012年

3 岳海斌;;農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地價格體系研究[A];福建省土地學會2009年年會論文集[C];2009年

4 王雨o，

本文編號：2183240