本文選題：集體建設(shè)用地 + 配置效率��； 參考：《福建師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)的集體建設(shè)用地具有很大的存量,為了實(shí)現(xiàn)城市的可持續(xù)發(fā)展,需要提高集體建設(shè)用地的配置效率。本文以“我國(guó)農(nóng)村集體建設(shè)用地配置效率研究”為題,以“制度形成與演變——配置現(xiàn)狀評(píng)析——效率對(duì)比分析——改進(jìn)配置效率”的路徑為貫穿全文的主線。在介紹國(guó)內(nèi)外研究動(dòng)態(tài)和本文相關(guān)理論的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)集體建設(shè)用地的形成、制度變遷的過(guò)程進(jìn)行回顧；接著考察現(xiàn)今集體建設(shè)用地的三大配置方式(分別為土地征收、“違規(guī)”直接入市和建設(shè)用地指標(biāo)交易的配置方式),并對(duì)其進(jìn)行效率評(píng)價(jià)；在此基礎(chǔ)上,基于交易費(fèi)用理論對(duì)三種配置方式進(jìn)行效率對(duì)比分析；并結(jié)合十八屆三中全會(huì)的相關(guān)政策,提出改進(jìn)集體建設(shè)用地配置效率的思路。在此框架和路線分析下,本文得出如下基本結(jié)論：集體建設(shè)用地制度的形成和變遷路徑一直受到公有制和國(guó)家行為目標(biāo)的制約；當(dāng)前集體建設(shè)用地的配置方式主要可劃分為三種,即土地征收、“違規(guī)”直接入市和建設(shè)用地指標(biāo)交易的配置方式,三種配置方式對(duì)集體建設(shè)用地的配置都存在積極和消極的影響；不同集體建設(shè)用地配置方式的核心在于各利益主體對(duì)土地發(fā)展權(quán)和土地流轉(zhuǎn)權(quán)的爭(zhēng)奪；在當(dāng)前的制度安排下,總體來(lái)說(shuō),土地征收的配置方式更適合基于公共目的的集體建設(shè)用地配置,直接入市交易的配置方式更適合基于自利經(jīng)營(yíng)性目的(大部分位于城市周圍)的集體建設(shè)用地配置,建設(shè)用地指標(biāo)交易的配置方式更適合位于遠(yuǎn)郊的閑置集體建設(shè)用地；改進(jìn)集體建設(shè)用地的配置效率是一項(xiàng)系統(tǒng)的工程,需要從多個(gè)層面著手改革。
[Abstract]:In order to realize the sustainable development of the city, the allocation efficiency of the collective construction land needs to be improved. This paper focuses on "the study of the allocation efficiency of rural collective construction land in China", and takes the path of "system formation and evolution-analysis of the present situation of allocation-comparative analysis of efficiency-improvement of allocation efficiency" as the main line through the full text. On the basis of introducing the domestic and foreign research trends and the relevant theories of this paper, this paper reviews the formation of collective construction land and the process of institutional change, and then examines the three major allocation modes of collective construction land (land expropriation, respectively). On the basis of this, the efficiency of the three allocation methods is compared and analyzed based on the transaction cost theory. Combined with the relevant policies of the third Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, the paper puts forward some ideas to improve the allocation efficiency of collective construction land. In this framework and route analysis, this paper draws the following basic conclusions: the formation and transition of collective construction land system has been restricted by the public ownership and the goal of state behavior; At present, the allocation of collective construction land can be divided into three main types, namely, land expropriation, "illegal" direct entry into the market and allocation of construction land index transactions. There are positive and negative effects on the allocation of collective construction land by three kinds of collocation methods; the core of different allocation modes of collective construction land lies in the contention of various stakeholders for land development right and land transfer right; under the current system arrangement, the three kinds of collocation methods have a positive and negative effect on the allocation of collective construction land. In general, the allocation of land expropriation is more suitable for collective construction land allocation based on public purposes, and the allocation mode for direct market transactions is more suitable for collective construction land allocation based on self-profit management purposes (most of them are located around the city). The allocation mode of index transaction of construction land is more suitable for idle collective construction land located in the suburbs, and improving the allocation efficiency of collective construction land is a systematic project, which needs to be reformed from many aspects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F321.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陸家騮;新資源因素與現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);2001年05期

2 錢忠好;農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)產(chǎn)權(quán)殘缺與市場(chǎng)流轉(zhuǎn)困境:理論與政策分析[J];管理世界;2002年06期

3 曲福田;高艷梅;姜海;;我國(guó)土地管理政策:理論命題與機(jī)制轉(zhuǎn)變[J];管理世界;2005年04期

4 高圣平;劉守英;;集體建設(shè)用地進(jìn)入市場(chǎng):現(xiàn)實(shí)與法律困境[J];管理世界;2007年03期

5 錢忠好;馬凱;;我國(guó)城鄉(xiāng)非農(nóng)建設(shè)用地市場(chǎng):壟斷、分割與整合[J];管理世界;2007年06期

6 程世勇;李偉群;;城鄉(xiāng)土地價(jià)格雙軌制與要素組合效率的制度需求[J];價(jià)格月刊;2009年10期

7 吳月芽;農(nóng)村集體建設(shè)用地使用權(quán)入市流轉(zhuǎn)的可行性探析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2005年03期

8 陳利根;丁火平;梁亞榮;;集體建設(shè)用地流轉(zhuǎn)制度的法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革;2006年04期

9 朱德開(kāi);陳莉;朱天明;司武飛;;統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展中集體土地市場(chǎng)的建立[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題探索;2006年06期

10 劉守英;;土地資本化與農(nóng)村城市化道路——北京三模式調(diào)查[J];開(kāi)放導(dǎo)報(bào);2011年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2099833