本文選題：城鎮(zhèn)化 + 失地農(nóng)民��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)前,中國(guó)正處在全面建成小康社會(huì)的關(guān)鍵時(shí)期,城鎮(zhèn)化建設(shè)持續(xù)快速向前,征地拆遷成了不可繞過(guò)的必經(jīng)之路,導(dǎo)致失地農(nóng)民越來(lái)越多且呈現(xiàn)出急速擴(kuò)增模式。在征地拆遷安置過(guò)程中,多數(shù)地區(qū)和部門把主要精力都放在了發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)上,忽視了失地農(nóng)民這個(gè)"特殊"群體的切身利益,后續(xù)安置補(bǔ)償政策不完善、執(zhí)行不到位,導(dǎo)致失地農(nóng)民生活水平下降、長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)生計(jì)保障問(wèn)題得不到解決,引起失地農(nóng)民不滿,造成不容忽視的社會(huì)問(wèn)題,嚴(yán)重阻礙了新型城鎮(zhèn)化建設(shè)和小康社會(huì)的全面建成。濟(jì)南高新區(qū)東區(qū)(原歷城區(qū)孫村鎮(zhèn))自2005年由歷城區(qū)劃為高新區(qū)代管后,作為高新區(qū)乃至濟(jì)南市先進(jìn)制造業(yè)和信息通訊產(chǎn)業(yè)的集聚地,落地企業(yè)項(xiàng)目逐年增多,當(dāng)?shù)爻擎?zhèn)化建設(shè)開始快速向前推進(jìn)。但同時(shí)因征地拆遷,失地農(nóng)民數(shù)量逐年增多,暴露出來(lái)的失地農(nóng)民問(wèn)題也越來(lái)越突出,直接影響了當(dāng)?shù)氐慕?jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和社會(huì)穩(wěn)定,給高新區(qū)乃至濟(jì)南市的快速發(fā)展造成了一定阻礙。本文通過(guò)發(fā)放調(diào)查問(wèn)卷、入戶交流、座談交流、向相關(guān)部門領(lǐng)導(dǎo)和同事咨詢等方式,對(duì)東區(qū)失地農(nóng)民生存現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了摸底調(diào)查,對(duì)失地前后的生活狀態(tài)進(jìn)行了對(duì)比分析,結(jié)合日常工作接觸,分析失地農(nóng)民在安居、樂(lè)業(yè)等方面的主要問(wèn)題,根據(jù)當(dāng)前政府政策和片區(qū)實(shí)際提出易操作的有針對(duì)的對(duì)策建議。在調(diào)查研究中共發(fā)現(xiàn)了六類主要問(wèn)題:一是安置片區(qū)發(fā)展"散、慢";二是土地補(bǔ)償呈逐年減少趨勢(shì);三是失地農(nóng)民并未實(shí)現(xiàn)"安居";四是大量上訪導(dǎo)致社會(huì)穩(wěn)定形勢(shì)嚴(yán)峻;五是就業(yè)率和薪酬偏低;六是市民自我認(rèn)同感不高。究其原因:一是片區(qū)發(fā)展缺少前瞻性整體規(guī)劃;二是土地征收補(bǔ)償政策不完善;三是房屋安置政策不健全;四是村務(wù)公開缺乏透明度和監(jiān)管;五是失地農(nóng)民自身缺乏勞動(dòng)素質(zhì)和技能;六是市民化進(jìn)程緩慢。根據(jù)以上分析,本文提出如下六條建議:一是科學(xué)規(guī)劃借勢(shì)發(fā)展;二是進(jìn)一步健全土地征收補(bǔ)償政策;三是積極探索多元化安置模式;四是進(jìn)一步規(guī)范對(duì)村級(jí)事務(wù)的監(jiān)管;五是雙管齊下促進(jìn)就業(yè);六是加快推進(jìn)市民化進(jìn)程。以上建議和對(duì)策的出發(fā)點(diǎn)和落腳點(diǎn)在于解決失地農(nóng)民生產(chǎn)生活中面臨的主要問(wèn)題,緩解政府與失地農(nóng)民間的矛盾糾紛,實(shí)現(xiàn)失地農(nóng)民安居樂(lè)業(yè),保證并逐步提高他們的生活質(zhì)量和水平,保障后期征地拆遷工作順利開展,維護(hù)好安置片區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和社會(huì)穩(wěn)定,為推進(jìn)濟(jì)南高新區(qū)及其他類似區(qū)域的城鎮(zhèn)化發(fā)展提供參考和借鑒。
[Abstract]:At present, China is in the key period of building a well-to-do society in an all-round way. The construction of urbanization continues to move forward rapidly, land requisition and demolition become the only way that can not be bypassed, leading to more and more land-losing farmers and showing a rapid expansion model. In the process of land expropriation and relocation, most regions and departments have focused their main energies on developing the economy, ignoring the vital interests of the "special" group of land-losing peasants, and the subsequent resettlement and compensation policies are not perfect and the implementation is not in place. It leads to the decline of the living standard of the land-lost farmers, the unsolved long-term livelihood security problem, the dissatisfaction of the land-lost farmers, the social problems that can not be ignored, and the serious obstacles to the construction of new urbanization and the comprehensive construction of the well-off society. Since 2005, the East District of Jinan High-tech Zone (Sun Village Town, formerly Liicheng District) has been designated as the escrow of the High-Tech Zone. As a gathering place for advanced manufacturing and information and communication industries in Jinan, the number of landing enterprise projects has increased year by year. The construction of local urbanization began to move forward rapidly. But at the same time, because of land expropriation and relocation, the number of land-lost farmers has increased year by year, and the problems of land-lost farmers have become more and more prominent, which have directly affected the local economic development and social stability. To the high-tech zone and even the rapid development of Jinan caused certain obstacles. In this paper, by issuing questionnaires, household exchanges, discussion exchanges, consulting the leaders of relevant departments and colleagues, this paper makes a detailed survey on the living conditions of landless peasants in the eastern region, and makes a comparative analysis of the living conditions before and after the loss of land. Combined with daily work contact, this paper analyzes the main problems of landless farmers in the aspects of living and working in peace, and puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions which are easy to operate according to the current government policies and the actual situation of the areas. In the investigation and study, six main problems have been found: first, the development of the resettlement area is "scattered, slow"; second, the land compensation is decreasing year by year; third, the peasants who have lost land have not "lived in peace"; the fourth, the social stability situation is severe due to a large number of petition. Fifth, the employment rate and salary are on the low side; sixthly, the self-identity of the public is not high. The reasons are as follows: first, lack of forward-looking overall planning for the development of the district; second, imperfect land expropriation and compensation policy; third, inadequate housing rehousing policy; fourth, lack of transparency and supervision of village affairs open; Fifth, the lack of labor quality and skills of landless farmers; sixth, the slow process of urbanization. Based on the above analysis, this paper puts forward the following six suggestions: first, scientific planning to seize the opportunity to develop; second, further improve the land expropriation compensation policy; third, actively explore a diversified resettlement model; fourth, further standardize the supervision of village affairs; Fifth, two ways to promote employment; sixthly, to speed up the process of citizenship. The starting point of the above suggestions and countermeasures is to solve the main problems faced by land-lost farmers in their production and life, to alleviate the contradictions and disputes between the government and land-lost farmers, and to realize the peasants living and working in peace and contentment. To ensure and gradually improve their quality of life and standard, to ensure the smooth development of land requisition and relocation in the later period, and to maintain the economic development and social stability of the resettlement areas. For the promotion of Jinan high-tech zone and other similar areas of urbanization to provide reference and reference.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F323.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李瑜;;城市化進(jìn)程中失地農(nóng)民就業(yè)的困境與對(duì)策——以N縣C鄉(xiāng)為例[J];湖南行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

2 杜曦;;我國(guó)城市化進(jìn)程中失地農(nóng)民就業(yè)問(wèn)題:困境與出路[J];重慶理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué));2011年02期

3 李建勇;郭海仙;顧雷;;關(guān)于完善城鎮(zhèn)化過(guò)程中國(guó)家征地制度的思考[J];山西高等學(xué)校社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

4 杜偉;黃善明;;失地農(nóng)民權(quán)益保障問(wèn)題研究綜述及建議[J];生產(chǎn)力研究;2007年02期

5 湯志林;陳芬;;國(guó)外土地政策研究:價(jià)值導(dǎo)向、特征和熱點(diǎn)[J];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

6 趙淑麗;;城市化進(jìn)程中失地農(nóng)民問(wèn)題研究述評(píng)[J];甘肅農(nóng)業(yè);2007年01期

7 梁亞榮;胡會(huì)奎;;土地立法,多給農(nóng)民發(fā)言權(quán)[J];中國(guó)土地;2005年12期

8 余興厚;失地農(nóng)民問(wèn)題的制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];寧夏社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年03期

9 馬弛,張榮,彭霞;城市化與失地農(nóng)民就業(yè)[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2005年01期

10 周飛,倪紹祥;我國(guó)現(xiàn)行土地征用制度缺陷及其改革[J];江海學(xué)刊;2004年06期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 高勇;;失去土地的農(nóng)民如何生活[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2004年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 鄭濤;城鎮(zhèn)化進(jìn)程中失地農(nóng)民利益訴求問(wèn)題研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1991662