本文選題：多維貧困 + 貧困農(nóng)戶��； 參考：《中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：貧困是當(dāng)今人類社會(huì)發(fā)展面臨的重要問題,其有著深刻復(fù)雜的社會(huì)、經(jīng)濟(jì)內(nèi)涵。由于長期歷史遺留以及市場和自然風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的雙重威脅,中國農(nóng)村貧困狀況嚴(yán)重。扶貧工作雖然已經(jīng)取得了巨大成就,但在新常態(tài)形勢下,仍然面臨巨大壓力。隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展、社會(huì)進(jìn)步和人類文明水平的提高,貧困的內(nèi)涵和界定貧困的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)發(fā)生相應(yīng)的變化,貧困不僅僅是收入的缺乏,它是一種對人類基本發(fā)展能力的剝奪,表現(xiàn)在人們擁有較長壽命、擁有知識、尊嚴(yán)和體面生活等多方面權(quán)利的喪失。貧困問題的考察和分析,已從收入、消費(fèi)等單一視角走向多維視角。多維貧困測量方法為貧困識別提供新的視角,使人們對貧困的認(rèn)識更加全面,提高了貧困人口的瞄準(zhǔn)率,以便于提供更好的分類救助措施,提高扶貧政策的有效性。因此,本文開展了兩個(gè)研究主題:第一,多維貧困狀況測量及脫貧政策建議;第二,多維貧困測量效果評估。本文基于阿瑪?shù)賮喩哪芰ω毨Ю碚?沿用《人類發(fā)展報(bào)告》多維貧困測量框架,結(jié)合中國實(shí)際,從健康、教育、生活水平三個(gè)維度選取了身體健康、醫(yī)療保險(xiǎn)、成人教育、兒童教育、住房條件、生活用電、飲水安全、衛(wèi)生設(shè)施、做飯燃料、耐用品消費(fèi)等10個(gè)指標(biāo),利用中國家庭動(dòng)態(tài)跟蹤調(diào)查(簡稱CFPS)2014年數(shù)據(jù),運(yùn)用AF法對我國農(nóng)村多維貧困狀況進(jìn)行測量。其次,本文將多維貧困測量結(jié)果與實(shí)際扶貧工作中的收入貧困標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的測量結(jié)果進(jìn)行比較分析,驗(yàn)證多維貧困測量效果的精準(zhǔn)度,并將收入維度納入多維貧困框架進(jìn)一步驗(yàn)證多維貧困測量方法的有效性。經(jīng)過實(shí)證分析,本文得出的主要結(jié)論有:1.我國農(nóng)村多維貧困發(fā)生率較高,多維貧困情況復(fù)雜,單純以收入判定貧困會(huì)低估中國農(nóng)村的貧困程度。從多維貧困的地區(qū)分布看,除了西部地區(qū)貧困問題要持續(xù)進(jìn)行關(guān)注外,東部地區(qū)的多維貧困狀況也要得到重視。2.農(nóng)村成人教育及生活環(huán)境的改善應(yīng)該是扶貧政策未來的重點(diǎn),應(yīng)該與當(dāng)前我國的實(shí)施扶貧項(xiàng)目和美麗鄉(xiāng)村建設(shè)聯(lián)系起來。3.多維貧困測量方法優(yōu)于收入測量法。收入貧困與多維貧困的測算結(jié)果的重合度為57.21%,一方面表現(xiàn)收入在貧困測量時(shí)的關(guān)鍵和基礎(chǔ)作用,另一方面意味著收入測量法會(huì)遺漏42.79%的多維貧困戶。4.將收入維度納入多維貧困框架可以進(jìn)一步提高多維貧困測算的精準(zhǔn)率。納入收入維度的多維貧困測量方法與單維收入測量的擬合度提升了17.79%,從非收入貧困的群體中識別更多的多維貧困戶。為推動(dòng)多維貧困測量方法的落實(shí),本文對以下兩方面進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步討論:1.構(gòu)建符合我國國情的綜合貧困評價(jià)指數(shù);2.構(gòu)建貧困預(yù)防機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:Poverty is an important problem facing the development of human society today. It has a profound complex society and economic connotation. Because of the long-term history and the dual threat of market and natural risk, the poverty situation in China's rural areas is serious. Although the poverty alleviation work has made great achievements, it still faces great pressure under the new normal situation. The development of economy, social progress and the improvement of the level of human civilization, the connotation of poverty and the standard of defining poverty have changed correspondingly. Poverty is not only a lack of income, it is a deprivation of the basic human development ability, which is manifested in the loss of many rights, such as long life, knowledge, dignity and decent life. The investigation and analysis of the poverty problem has gone from a single perspective of income and consumption to a multi-dimensional perspective. The multidimensional poverty measurement method provides a new perspective for poverty recognition, makes people more comprehensive in understanding poverty, improves the targeting rate of the poor, and facilitates the provision of better classification assistance measures, so as to improve the effectiveness of Poverty Alleviation Policies. This article has carried out two research topics: first, Multidimensional Poverty Measurement and poverty reduction policy recommendations; second, multidimensional poverty measurement effect evaluation. Based on amartyson's theory of poverty, the paper adopts the human development report, multidimensional poverty measurement framework, and combines Chinese reality to select the body from three dimensions of health, education and living standards. Physical health, medical insurance, adult education, children's education, housing conditions, living electricity, drinking water safety, health facilities, cooking fuel, and durable goods consumption are 10 indicators. Using the data of Chinese family dynamic tracking survey (CFPS) in 2014, this paper uses AF method to measure the multi-dimensional poverty situation in rural villages of our country. Secondly, this paper will measure multidimensional poverty measurement. The results are compared with the measurement results of the income poverty standards in the actual poverty alleviation work, and the accuracy of the multidimensional poverty measurement results is verified, and the income dimension is incorporated into the Multidimensional Poverty framework to further verify the effectiveness of Multidimensional Poverty Measurement methods. After empirical analysis, the main conclusions are as follows: 1. the Multidimensional Poverty in China's rural areas is a multidimensional poverty. The occurrence rate is high, the Multidimensional Poverty is complex, the poverty in the rural areas is underestimated by the simple income determination poverty. In view of the multidimensional poverty area distribution, in addition to the continuous attention of the poverty in the western region, the multi-dimensional poverty in the eastern region should also be paid attention to the improvement of the rural adult education and the living environment in the.2. rural areas. The future focus of poverty alleviation policy should be related to the current implementation of poverty alleviation projects and the construction of beautiful countryside in China. The.3. multidimensional poverty measurement method is superior to the income measurement method. The coincidence degree of the results of income poverty and multidimensional poverty is 57.21%, on the one hand, the key and basic role of income in the measurement of poverty, on the other hand, means The inclusion of income dimensions into multidimensional poverty framework can further improve the accuracy of Multidimensional Poverty Measurement with the income measure missing 42.79% of the multidimensional poor households.4.. The multidimensional poverty measurement method incorporated into the income dimension and the single dimension income measurement have increased by 17.79%, and more multidimensional poor households are identified from the non income poor groups. In order to promote the implementation of multi-dimensional poverty measurement methods, the following two aspects are further discussed in this paper: 1. to build a comprehensive poverty evaluation index in line with the national conditions of our country; and 2. to build a poverty prevention mechanism.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F323.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張童朝;顏廷武;何可;張俊飚;;基于市場參與維度的農(nóng)戶多維貧困測量研究——以連片特困地區(qū)為例[J];中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期

2 鄒波;張彬;柴盈;;我國連片特困區(qū)的綠色貧困問題研究[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2016年02期

3 劉鳳芹;徐月賓;;誰在享有公共救助資源?——中國農(nóng)村低保制度的瞄準(zhǔn)效果研究[J];公共管理學(xué)報(bào);2016年01期

4 馮賀霞;王小林;夏慶杰;;收入貧困與多維貧困關(guān)系分析[J];勞動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年06期

5 吳曉燕;趙普兵;;農(nóng)村精準(zhǔn)扶貧中的協(xié)商:內(nèi)容與機(jī)制——基于四川省南部縣A村的觀察[J];社會(huì)主義研究;2015年06期

6 鄭寶華;蔣京梅;;建立需求響應(yīng)機(jī)制 提高扶貧的精準(zhǔn)度[J];云南社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年06期

7 汪三貴;郭子豪;;論中國的精準(zhǔn)扶貧[J];貴州社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年05期

8 李昊源;崔琪琪;;農(nóng)村居民家庭貧困的特征與原因研究——基于對甘肅省調(diào)研數(shù)據(jù)的分析[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年04期

9 楊龍;汪三貴;;貧困地區(qū)農(nóng)戶的多維貧困測量與分解——基于2010年中國農(nóng)村貧困監(jiān)測的農(nóng)戶數(shù)據(jù)[J];人口學(xué)刊;2015年02期

10 李會(huì)琴;侯林春;楊樹旺;J R Brent Ritchie;;國外旅游扶貧研究進(jìn)展[J];人文地理;2015年01期

，

本文編號：1815927