本文選題：草原生態(tài)補(bǔ)償政策 + 政策實(shí)施現(xiàn)狀　； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國是生態(tài)大國,草原生態(tài)系統(tǒng)在我國生態(tài)系統(tǒng)中占有無可替代的地位,是經(jīng)濟(jì)文明、政治文明、社會(huì)文明、文化文明和生態(tài)文明的重要組成部分。草原不僅是牧民的安身之所,同時(shí)也是我國的立國基礎(chǔ)。內(nèi)蒙古自治區(qū)因其獨(dú)特的地理位置和草原環(huán)境的多樣化,使我國多項(xiàng)草原政策都是在內(nèi)蒙古進(jìn)行試點(diǎn)后再向國內(nèi)其它地區(qū)推廣。針對這一情況通過對內(nèi)蒙古現(xiàn)行草原生態(tài)補(bǔ)償政策實(shí)施內(nèi)容整理,然后對政策實(shí)施地區(qū)——鄂溫克旗進(jìn)行了實(shí)地調(diào)研,對政策實(shí)施效果進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)性分析后得出政策執(zhí)行和制定過程中可能存在的誤區(qū),為完善草原生態(tài)補(bǔ)償政策提供可靠依據(jù)。通過調(diào)研發(fā)現(xiàn)內(nèi)蒙古草原生態(tài)補(bǔ)償政策實(shí)施中存在以下問題:一補(bǔ)償方式過于單一,難以根絕草原生態(tài)破壞問題;二是工作者和牧民在溝通上存在一定障礙;三是政策中要求的減畜目標(biāo)沒有達(dá)到;四補(bǔ)償金使用效率低,發(fā)放時(shí)間與牧業(yè)生產(chǎn)不契合;五是牧民在執(zhí)行生態(tài)補(bǔ)償措施時(shí)互相推諉;六是政府工作人員身兼數(shù)職,針對不強(qiáng)。造成問題的原因主要有:首先政策的內(nèi)容不夠合理,補(bǔ)償金不能彌補(bǔ)牧民的經(jīng)濟(jì)損失,牲畜的限定也缺乏彈性,;其次政府工作不到位,政府對政策的宣傳力度不夠,政策反饋程度低;再是社會(huì)保障水平低,致使牧民不得不將生態(tài)補(bǔ)償金用于教育、醫(yī)療等方面;最后經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展模式單一和補(bǔ)償金投入過低,牧業(yè)生產(chǎn)占絕大多數(shù),少有其他產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展。有必要從以下幾個(gè)方面對現(xiàn)有內(nèi)蒙古草原生態(tài)補(bǔ)償政策進(jìn)行完善:一完善法律體系,使草原生態(tài)補(bǔ)償政策有法可依;二拓展生態(tài)補(bǔ)償資金來源,多方位填補(bǔ)資金缺口;三改變政府原有工作方式,提高政府工作質(zhì)量;四補(bǔ)充修改政策內(nèi)容,改變政策制定模式;五完善牧區(qū)社會(huì)保障體系,解決牧民后顧之憂。
[Abstract]:China is an ecological country. The grassland ecosystem occupies an irreplaceable position in the ecological system of our country. It is an important part of economic civilization, political civilization, social civilization, cultural civilization and ecological civilization. The grassland is not only the shelter of the herdsmen, but also the foundation of our country. The Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region has its unique geographical position. As well as the diversification of grassland environment, many prairie policies in China are carried out in Inner Mongolia and then popularized in other parts of China. According to this situation, the implementation of the current grassland ecological compensation policy in Inner Mongolia is arranged, and then the field investigation of the policy implementation area, Ewenk banner, is carried out and the effect of policy implementation is carried out. After statistical analysis, we can get the misunderstandings that may exist in the process of policy implementation and formulation, and provide a reliable basis for improving the grassland ecological compensation policy. Through investigation, the following problems exist in the implementation of Inner Mongolia grassland ecological compensation policy: one is too single, and it is difficult to eradicate the problem of grassland ecological destruction; two is the workers and herdsmen in the grassland ecological compensation policy. There are some obstacles in communication; three is that the goal of reducing livestock in the policy is not reached; four the use efficiency of compensation gold is low, and the time is not compatible with the production of animal husbandry; five is the herdsmen in the implementation of ecological compensation measures to each other; six is the number of government staff, not strong. The main reasons for the problem are the content of the first policy content. It is not reasonable enough, compensation can not make up for the economic loss of the herdsmen, the limit of livestock is also lack of elasticity, the second government work is not in place, the government's propaganda of policy is not enough, the level of policy feedback is low, and the level of social security is low, so the herdsmen have to use the ecological compensation for education, medical treatment and so on. Finally, the model of economic development is single. First, the investment of the compensation fund is too low, the production of animal husbandry accounts for the vast majority, and there are few other industries. It is necessary to perfect the existing Inner Mongolia grassland ecological compensation policy from the following aspects: first, to perfect the legal system, to make the grassland ecological compensation policy in accordance with the law; two to expand the source of the ecological compensation fund, to fill the fund gap in many directions; three change The government's original work way to improve the quality of government work; four to supplement and modify the content of the policy, to change the mode of policy formulation; five to improve the social security system in pastoral areas and to solve the worries of the herdsmen.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F323.212;X321

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王濤;;試分析人力資源社會(huì)保障公共服務(wù)法制化的推進(jìn)[J];才智;2017年03期

2 ;內(nèi)蒙古自治區(qū)人民政府辦公廳關(guān)于健全生態(tài)保護(hù)補(bǔ)償機(jī)制的實(shí)施意見[J];內(nèi)蒙古自治區(qū)人民政府公報(bào);2017年02期

3 王關(guān)區(qū);吳晶英;劉小燕;;內(nèi)蒙古牧區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的成效、問題及其對策[J];北方經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年11期

4 烏吉斯古楞;;內(nèi)蒙古草原生態(tài)補(bǔ)獎(jiǎng)機(jī)制中存在的問題及對策[J];北方經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年08期

5 陳寶新;;內(nèi)蒙古草原生態(tài)補(bǔ)償實(shí)踐與效益評價(jià)研究[J];內(nèi)蒙古科技與經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年13期

6 孔德帥;胡振通;靳樂山;;草原生態(tài)補(bǔ)償機(jī)制中的資金分配模式研究——基于內(nèi)蒙古34個(gè)嘎查的實(shí)證分析[J];干旱區(qū)資源與環(huán)境;2016年05期

7 祁曉慧;高博;王海春;周杰;喬光華;;牧民視角下的草原生態(tài)保護(hù)補(bǔ)助獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)政策草畜平衡及禁牧補(bǔ)獎(jiǎng)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究——以錫林郭勒盟為例[J];干旱區(qū)資源與環(huán)境;2016年05期

8 習(xí)近平;;在省部級主要領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部學(xué)習(xí)貫徹黨的十八屆五中全會(huì)精神專題研討班上的講話[J];中國應(yīng)急管理;2016年05期

9 馬小虎;;新媒體時(shí)代的公共政策創(chuàng)新研究——基于信息傳播變革的視角[J];理論觀察;2016年04期

10 齊米克;孫強(qiáng);閆凱;;新疆草原生態(tài)保護(hù)補(bǔ)助獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)效果初步評價(jià)及問題解析——以溫泉縣、拜城縣為例[J];草食家畜;2016年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 李向前;毛顯強(qiáng);張勝;;生態(tài)破壞損失價(jià)值評估框架研究[A];中國環(huán)境科學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)2009年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集（第三卷）[C];2009年

，

本文編號：1814475