本文選題：農(nóng)村低保對(duì)象 + 誠(chéng)信缺失��； 參考：《江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)前,農(nóng)村貧困問(wèn)題已成為社會(huì)各界關(guān)注的熱點(diǎn)之一,其中,農(nóng)村最低生活保障制度作為解決農(nóng)村貧困問(wèn)題的重要制度安排也越來(lái)越被外界所關(guān)注。近年來(lái),農(nóng)村低保對(duì)象誠(chéng)信缺失現(xiàn)象愈發(fā)嚴(yán)重,在某種程度上已嚴(yán)重?fù)p害了農(nóng)村低保制度的權(quán)威性和公信力。因此,解決農(nóng)村低保對(duì)象誠(chéng)信缺失問(wèn)題已迫在眉睫。本文將誠(chéng)信機(jī)制的建設(shè)作為切入點(diǎn)來(lái)考察農(nóng)村低保對(duì)象誠(chéng)信狀況。要想在我國(guó)構(gòu)建完整而又不失效用的農(nóng)村低保對(duì)象誠(chéng)信機(jī)制,就需要突破道德化誠(chéng)信的樊籬,轉(zhuǎn)而追求制度化誠(chéng)信。根據(jù)過(guò)往的經(jīng)驗(yàn)顯示,在農(nóng)村低保領(lǐng)域,要構(gòu)建與之相關(guān)的誠(chéng)信機(jī)制,單純依賴道德教化是非常片面和不足的,需要出臺(tái)全面系統(tǒng)的治理方案,本文在這方面作出一定的探索。本文首先對(duì)低保對(duì)象的誠(chéng)信缺失現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行了研究,通過(guò)實(shí)地調(diào)研和訪談搜集有關(guān)資料,總結(jié)了農(nóng)村低保對(duì)象誠(chéng)信缺失的種種表現(xiàn),如拼保、輪保、人情保、關(guān)系保以及維穩(wěn)保等等。然后,從主客觀兩方面入手分析了導(dǎo)致農(nóng)村低保對(duì)象誠(chéng)信缺失的原因。緊接著又選取了澳大利亞和日本這兩個(gè)具有代表性的國(guó)家,梳理了兩國(guó)最低生活保障制度中有關(guān)誠(chéng)信機(jī)制方面的內(nèi)容,并總結(jié)出了可供我國(guó)借鑒之處。文章最后在前文的研究基礎(chǔ)上,從農(nóng)村低保制度“準(zhǔn)入—管理—退出”三個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)入手,構(gòu)建了農(nóng)村低保對(duì)象誠(chéng)信機(jī)制,該機(jī)制包含三大模塊,即誠(chéng)信預(yù)警機(jī)制、誠(chéng)信監(jiān)督機(jī)制、誠(chéng)信獎(jiǎng)懲機(jī)制,同時(shí)這三大模塊又由信息共享機(jī)制、誠(chéng)信承諾保證制度、誠(chéng)信審查對(duì)比機(jī)制、政府監(jiān)督機(jī)制、社會(huì)輿論監(jiān)督機(jī)制、失信懲戒機(jī)制、誠(chéng)信激勵(lì)機(jī)制這七個(gè)子機(jī)制構(gòu)成。只有讓各個(gè)子機(jī)制共同作用,密切配合,農(nóng)村低保對(duì)象誠(chéng)信機(jī)制才能真正發(fā)揮效用。
[Abstract]:At present, the problem of rural poverty has become one of the hot spots in the society, among which, the rural minimum living security system, as an important institutional arrangement to solve the rural poverty problem, has been paid more and more attention to by the outside world.In recent years, the phenomenon of lack of honesty and credit of the rural minimum living standard has become more and more serious, which to some extent has seriously damaged the authority and credibility of the rural minimum security system.Therefore, it is urgent to solve the problem of lack of honesty and credit of rural low-guarantee object.This article regards the construction of the honesty mechanism as the starting point to investigate the credit situation of the rural low-guarantee object.It is necessary to break through the barriers of moral integrity and to pursue institutionalized honesty if we want to build a complete and effective system of honesty and credit for rural low guarantee objects in our country.According to the past experience, in the field of rural minimum security, it is very one-sided and insufficient to build up the credit mechanism related to it, and it is necessary to introduce a comprehensive and systematic management scheme. This paper makes a certain exploration in this respect.Firstly, this paper studies the phenomenon of lack of honesty and credit of the low guarantee object. Through field investigation and interview to collect relevant information, this paper summarizes the various manifestations of the lack of integrity of the rural low guarantee object, such as combination insurance, rotation protection, human protection, etc.Relationship protection and maintenance and so on.Then, from subjective and objective aspects, the paper analyzes the reasons that lead to the lack of credibility of the rural low-guarantee object.Then two representative countries, Australia and Japan, are selected to sort out the content of honesty mechanism in the minimum living security system of the two countries, and summarize the points for our country to draw lessons from.Finally, on the basis of the previous research, starting with the three links of "admittance, management-exit" of the rural minimum security system, this paper constructs the credit mechanism of the rural minimum guarantee object, which consists of three modules, namely, the honesty early warning mechanism and the honesty supervision mechanism.At the same time, these three modules are composed of the information sharing mechanism, the integrity commitment guarantee system, the integrity review and comparison mechanism, the government supervision mechanism, the social public opinion supervision mechanism, and the dishonest punishment mechanism.The seven sub-mechanisms of honesty and credit incentive mechanism constitute.Only let each sub-mechanism work together and cooperate closely, can the credit mechanism of the rural low guarantee object really play its role.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F323.89

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張圣友;李朝陽(yáng);王冰;;以社會(huì)誠(chéng)信建設(shè)推進(jìn)社會(huì)治理精細(xì)化:深圳羅湖的探索與實(shí)踐[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2016年07期

2 呂學(xué)靜;;日本社會(huì)救助制度的最新改革及對(duì)中國(guó)的啟示[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年03期

3 魏程琳;史源淵;;確保農(nóng)村最低生活保障效果的制度文本與實(shí)踐[J];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年04期

4 何倩;;低保退出機(jī)制中個(gè)體價(jià)值的尊重與保障[J];社會(huì)保障研究;2014年04期

5 趙新龍;;我國(guó)農(nóng)村低保的地方樣態(tài)及其經(jīng)驗(yàn)——以80個(gè)地方立法主體為樣本[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)探討;2014年07期

6 印子;;治理消解行政:對(duì)國(guó)家政策執(zhí)行偏差的一種解釋——基于豫南G鎮(zhèn)低保政策的實(shí)踐分析[J];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年03期

7 魏程琳;;權(quán)力與關(guān)系網(wǎng)絡(luò)中的農(nóng)村低保[J];青年研究;2014年03期

8 李春根;應(yīng)麗;;指標(biāo)代理法:農(nóng)村低保對(duì)象瞄準(zhǔn)新機(jī)制[J];社會(huì)保障研究;2014年01期

9 韋璞;;村莊特征與農(nóng)村低保瞄準(zhǔn)偏誤的實(shí)證研究——基于場(chǎng)域理論視角的探析[J];理論月刊;2013年10期

10 黨秀云;;重建社會(huì)信任:中國(guó)社會(huì)建設(shè)的心靈之旅[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2013年07期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張乃亭;農(nóng)村最低生活保障制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 祝玉斌;農(nóng)村最低生活保障制度的保障對(duì)象瞄準(zhǔn)研究[D];華東理工大學(xué);2015年

2 呂守輝;食品安全保障誠(chéng)信機(jī)制構(gòu)建研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2013年

3 李忠;中國(guó)市場(chǎng)誠(chéng)信機(jī)制建設(shè)研究[D];海南大學(xué);2013年

4 劉利娟;論在社會(huì)信用體系下對(duì)民事“執(zhí)行難”的攻克[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

5 王進(jìn);中西方誠(chéng)信觀比較[D];華中師范大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1757335