本文選題：出口貿(mào)易成本 + 貿(mào)易成本測(cè)度��； 參考：《世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究》2013年05期

【摘要】：目前測(cè)度貿(mào)易成本廣為應(yīng)用的Novy方法存在實(shí)踐性缺陷,本文直接基于Andersen多邊一般均衡微觀需求建模思路,重構(gòu)可行的出口貿(mào)易成本測(cè)度方程,并以中國(guó)經(jīng)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)為例證與原有方法進(jìn)行了對(duì)比分析。結(jié)果表明,兩種方法存在穩(wěn)健的測(cè)度差異,很有必要認(rèn)真探討。近年來(lái)中國(guó)與主要貿(mào)易伙伴雙邊貿(mào)易成本整體加速下降,亞太地區(qū)及北方鄰國(guó)貿(mào)易成本明顯小于其他地區(qū)。
[Abstract]:At present, Novy method, which is widely used to measure trade cost, has some practical defects. This paper reconstructs the feasible measurement equation of export trade cost directly based on the idea of Andersen multilateral equilibrium micro demand modeling. The empirical data of China are taken as an example and the original method is compared and analyzed. The results show that there are robust differences between the two methods, so it is necessary to discuss them carefully. Bilateral trade costs between China and its major trading partners have accelerated in recent years, and trade costs in the Asia-Pacific region and neighbouring countries in the north are significantly lower than in other regions.
【作者單位】： 新疆師范大學(xué)法經(jīng)學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究新疆項(xiàng)目(10XJJC790001) 新疆維吾爾自治區(qū)社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(10BJY013) 新疆師范大學(xué)自治區(qū)高校文科基地中亞與中國(guó)西北邊疆政治經(jīng)濟(jì)研究中心項(xiàng)目資助
【分類號(hào)】：F740.45;F224
，

本文編號(hào)：1923961