本文關(guān)鍵詞：S公司高技術(shù)投資項(xiàng)目效益評(píng)估體系研究　出處：《華南理工大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 技術(shù)成熟度 經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)價(jià) 項(xiàng)目投資評(píng)價(jià)流程

【摘要】：近年以來(lái)，企業(yè)的人力成本壓力越來(lái)越大，為提高生產(chǎn)率，增加公司的成本優(yōu)勢(shì)，公司導(dǎo)入大量新項(xiàng)目對(duì)生產(chǎn)線進(jìn)行自動(dòng)化改造。同時(shí)為了在未來(lái)的市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中保持優(yōu)勢(shì)地位，大量的資金投入了新技術(shù)的研發(fā)。但是通過(guò)對(duì)2008-2010年期間所推進(jìn)的項(xiàng)目的統(tǒng)計(jì)來(lái)看，有26.7%的項(xiàng)目收益未能達(dá)到預(yù)期，2.1%的項(xiàng)目與預(yù)期完全背離，未能產(chǎn)生任何收益，浪費(fèi)了大量資金和人力。為了提高項(xiàng)目的成功率，增加資金的使用效率，提高企業(yè)的經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)，公司決定構(gòu)建新的高技術(shù)投資項(xiàng)目效益評(píng)估體系，以提高項(xiàng)目評(píng)估的有效性，降低項(xiàng)目的失敗率。 本文通過(guò)對(duì)舊的項(xiàng)目評(píng)估流程進(jìn)行分析，對(duì)相關(guān)部門進(jìn)行調(diào)查，總結(jié)出現(xiàn)有高技術(shù)項(xiàng)目效益評(píng)估體系的不足，提出新的高技術(shù)投資項(xiàng)目效益評(píng)估體系需要改善的部分，設(shè)定新評(píng)估體系需要達(dá)成的目標(biāo)。在構(gòu)建新的效益評(píng)估體系時(shí)，運(yùn)用經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)價(jià)相關(guān)理論和技術(shù)成熟度評(píng)價(jià)方法，對(duì)項(xiàng)目的預(yù)期收益進(jìn)行評(píng)估，對(duì)項(xiàng)目的技術(shù)成熟度進(jìn)行驗(yàn)證；在項(xiàng)目后評(píng)價(jià)時(shí)，，采用實(shí)際數(shù)據(jù)對(duì)項(xiàng)目收益進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)；同時(shí)推行了新的數(shù)據(jù)搜集系統(tǒng)，對(duì)相關(guān)的數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行自動(dòng)搜集匯總，避免了數(shù)據(jù)偏差。在構(gòu)建了新的高技術(shù)投資項(xiàng)目效益評(píng)估體系后，以實(shí)際推行的項(xiàng)目為例介紹了該體系的具體運(yùn)用。 通過(guò)2011-2014年所推行項(xiàng)目的匯總結(jié)果來(lái)看，該新評(píng)估體系有效的提高的項(xiàng)目評(píng)估的有效性，符合評(píng)估預(yù)期的項(xiàng)目從71.2%提高到92.7%，實(shí)際收益比評(píng)估收益小的項(xiàng)目從26.7%減少到7.3%，評(píng)估成功率得到了極大的提高。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the pressure of human cost of enterprises is increasing, in order to improve productivity, increase the cost advantage of the company. The company introduced a large number of new projects to automate the production line. At the same time, in order to maintain a dominant position in the future market competition. A lot of money has been invested in the development of new technologies. But according to the statistics of the projects carried out in 2008-2010, 26.7% of the project proceeds have fallen short of expectations. 2.1% of the project completely deviated from expectations, failed to produce any income, wasted a lot of capital and manpower. In order to improve the success rate of the project, increase the efficiency of the use of funds, improve the business performance of the enterprise. The company decided to construct a new high-tech investment project benefit evaluation system to improve the effectiveness of project evaluation and reduce the failure rate of the project. Through the analysis of the old project evaluation process and the investigation of the relevant departments, this paper summarizes the shortcomings of the benefit evaluation system of high-tech projects. Put forward the new high-tech investment project benefit evaluation system needs to improve the part, set the new evaluation system needs to achieve the goals. In the construction of a new benefit evaluation system. Based on the theory of economic evaluation and the method of technology maturity evaluation, the expected income of the project is evaluated, and the technical maturity of the project is verified. In the post-evaluation of the project, the actual data is used to evaluate the benefits of the project. At the same time, a new data collection system is implemented, and the related data is collected and summarized automatically, which avoids the deviation of the data. After the construction of a new high-tech investment project benefit evaluation system. Taking the actual project as an example, the concrete application of the system is introduced. The combined results of the projects carried out in 2011-2014 show that the new evaluation system effectively enhances the effectiveness of project evaluations. The number of projects in line with the evaluation expectation was increased from 71.2% to 92.7, and the actual income was reduced from 26.7% to 7.3, and the success rate of evaluation was greatly improved.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F406.7;F416.671

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高志;NPV法在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資項(xiàng)目評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J];大連鐵道學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

2 沈丹;;基于層次分析法進(jìn)行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資項(xiàng)目評(píng)價(jià)[J];廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

3 王世波,崔金鑒,王世良;基于層次分析法的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資項(xiàng)目評(píng)價(jià)[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2003年06期

4 扶縛龍,黃健柏;現(xiàn)行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資項(xiàng)目評(píng)估方法局限性分析[J];決策借鑒;2002年01期

5 李葳;張春昕;;項(xiàng)目投資決策評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)研究[J];市場(chǎng)論壇;2010年09期

6 李翔,齊寅峰;我國(guó)企業(yè)投資決策程序的現(xiàn)狀與問(wèn)題[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題;2005年05期

7 靳景玉,朱永貴;基于AHP的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資環(huán)境各層次因素權(quán)重確定[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2005年02期

8 梁春閣;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資評(píng)估模糊評(píng)判模型建立與擴(kuò)展[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2005年07期

9 張春英,姜丹;高新技術(shù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資項(xiàng)目評(píng)估定量模型研究[J];科學(xué)管理研究;2001年05期

10 崔安定,趙遠(yuǎn)亮;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資項(xiàng)目決策的模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)[J];科學(xué)管理研究;2002年05期

本文編號(hào)：1377943