【摘要】： 方法論對于認識世界或改造世界具有舉足輕重的作用,經(jīng)濟學也不例外。傳統(tǒng)經(jīng)濟學從很多方面忽略現(xiàn)實因素,比如,完全競爭、經(jīng)濟人等假定,把經(jīng)濟運行的總體與參與者作了最理想的刻畫。而科斯所倡導的經(jīng)濟學思想很好地彌補了這方面的缺陷�？扑沟慕�(jīng)濟學研究拉近了經(jīng)濟學與現(xiàn)實的距離。對于經(jīng)濟體系中制度性結(jié)構(gòu)的研究,科斯充分考慮了現(xiàn)實因素,揭示并澄清了交易成本費用和產(chǎn)權(quán)理論,開創(chuàng)了經(jīng)濟學領(lǐng)域的新制度經(jīng)濟時代�！捌髽I(yè)的性質(zhì)”(1937)和“社會成本問題”(1960年)就是科斯兩篇最為著名的代表作。 科斯的經(jīng)濟理論源于他獨特的經(jīng)濟學方法論思想,其中所蘊含的對于經(jīng)濟現(xiàn)實性與制度性的考慮,以及對經(jīng)濟體系整體性的把握,凸顯出科斯與眾不同的方法論特征。本論文通過對科斯原著的解讀,并結(jié)合現(xiàn)階段國內(nèi)外學者對科斯方法論思想的研究成果,總結(jié)了科斯方法論思想的現(xiàn)實主義、整體主義、制度主義特征,并對它們之間相互聯(lián)系、相互依存的關(guān)系進行了各個側(cè)面的探討�？扑沟慕�(jīng)濟學方法論中既有對傳統(tǒng)經(jīng)濟學方法論的繼承,也有對傳統(tǒng)經(jīng)濟學方法論的創(chuàng)新；其一方面脫離不開傳統(tǒng)經(jīng)濟學方法論而獨立存在,另一方面也包含了對于傳統(tǒng)經(jīng)濟學方法論的挑戰(zhàn)與背叛,后者更是引發(fā)了針對科斯經(jīng)濟思想的爭論；對于如何看待科斯經(jīng)濟學思想的問題,本論文在總結(jié)各方爭論的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了從其方法論的角度著眼,而非純經(jīng)濟學思想的角度來分析和解決科斯經(jīng)濟思想中矛盾性的觀點。 科斯的經(jīng)濟學方法論思想有其獨特鮮明的個人特色,他沒有遵循傳統(tǒng)意義上經(jīng)濟學方法論的研究定式；但不可否認科斯經(jīng)濟學方法論的在構(gòu)建其經(jīng)濟理論方面起到了極其重要的基礎(chǔ)性作用。本論文希望通過對科斯原著的解讀,能夠?qū)扑沟姆椒ㄕ撍枷脒M行系統(tǒng)的梳理、評價,分析科斯這種直面現(xiàn)象的方法論思想對經(jīng)濟學及其傳統(tǒng)方法論的影響,研討這種方法論在經(jīng)濟學中所起的作用。
[Abstract]:Methodology plays an important role in understanding or transforming the world, and economics is no exception. Traditional economics ignores the realistic factors in many aspects, such as complete competition, economic man and so on. And Coase advocated the economics thought to make up this flaw very well. Coase's study of economics draws close the distance between economics and reality. For the study of the institutional structure in the economic system, Coase fully considered the realistic factors, revealed and clarified the transaction cost and property right theory, and opened a new era of institutional economy in the field of economics. The Nature of Enterprises (1937) and the Social cost problem (1960) are two of Coase's most famous masterpieces. Coase's economic theory originates from his unique thought of economic methodology, which contains the consideration of economic reality and system, as well as the grasp of the integrity of economic system, which highlights Coase's distinctive methodological characteristics. Based on the interpretation of Coase's original works and the research achievements of scholars at home and abroad on Coase's methodology at present, this paper summarizes the characteristics of Coase's methodology, such as realism, holism and institutionalism. At the same time, the relationship of their interrelation and interdependence is discussed in various aspects. Coase's economics methodology not only inherits the traditional economics methodology, but also has the innovation to the traditional economics methodology, on the one hand, it exists independently from the traditional economics methodology. On the other hand, it also contains the challenge and betrayal to the traditional economics methodology, which leads to the controversy of Coase's economic thought. This paper puts forward the viewpoint of analyzing and resolving the contradiction in Coase's economic thought from the point of view of methodology rather than pure economics. Coase's thought of economic methodology has its own distinctive individual characteristics, and he does not follow the research formula of economics methodology in the traditional sense. But it is undeniable that the methodology of Coase's economics plays an extremely important and fundamental role in the construction of its economic theory. This paper hopes to analyze the influence of Coase's methodology on economics and its traditional methodology through the interpretation of Coase's original works and the systematic analysis and evaluation of Coase's methodology. Study the role of this methodology in economics.
【學位授予單位】：河北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：F091.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 李江;論科斯對經(jīng)濟學方法論的貢獻——以《社會成本問題》為例[J];湖北經(jīng)濟學院學報;2004年04期

2 楊立雄;“個體主義”抑或“整體主義”[J];經(jīng)濟學家;2000年01期

3 張曙光;;論制度均衡和制度變革[J];經(jīng)濟研究;1992年06期

4 傅耀;當代西方新制度經(jīng)濟學方法論探析[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會科學(漢文版);2002年04期

，

本文編號：2157960