本文選題：全球化與后工業(yè)化時(shí)代 + 市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)與不平等��； 參考：《改革與戰(zhàn)略》2011年11期

【摘要】：文章剖析了后工業(yè)時(shí)代社會(huì)全球化的歷史性變化,包括其如何在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與不平等的條件下發(fā)展并影響人們的日常生活,如何在世界范圍內(nèi)改變社會(huì)福利保障的狀況及影響公共政策的制定。隨著貧富分布不均以及社會(huì)階層化等現(xiàn)象的出現(xiàn),整個(gè)社會(huì)的結(jié)構(gòu)正在重新構(gòu)建,迅速成長(zhǎng)的自由市場(chǎng)帶動(dòng)相關(guān)經(jīng)濟(jì)力量的發(fā)展,并伴隨著關(guān)于理性化、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化、商品化或是世俗主義思想的擴(kuò)散。在經(jīng)濟(jì)下滑以及勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)的軟化的情況下,在全球范圍內(nèi)尋求更完善的社會(huì)保障措施的呼聲越來(lái)越高。如今,原有的20世紀(jì)的福利國(guó)家形式已被21世紀(jì)一種更有競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的形態(tài)所取代,即所謂"非主權(quán)權(quán)力",其在全球范圍內(nèi)越來(lái)越受到關(guān)注,但在各種社會(huì)勢(shì)力(例如NGOs非政府組織)中對(duì)日常生活的影響仍舊較弱。盡管在國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與社會(huì)政策制定之間存在著滯后性,國(guó)家政權(quán)在跨國(guó)公司利益主導(dǎo)的世界范圍內(nèi)還是具有重要的管理功能。在全球化已經(jīng)影響了社會(huì)契約的情況下,社會(huì)福利的未來(lái)雖難以抉擇,但終究是要向著商品化的社會(huì)服務(wù)方向發(fā)展。鑒于公正與治理帶來(lái)的挑戰(zhàn),文章認(rèn)為,如今市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的走向必須由反映人的根本價(jià)值的道德原則來(lái)指導(dǎo),而社會(huì)福利保障等概念則需要重新定義和延伸。
[Abstract]:This paper analyzes the historical changes of social globalization in the post-industrial era, including how it develops and affects people's daily life under the conditions of risk and inequality. How to change the situation of social welfare and influence the formulation of public policy in the world. With the emergence of inequality between the rich and the poor and social stratification, the structure of the whole society is being rebuilt, and the rapidly growing free market is driving the development of the relevant economic forces, accompanied by the rationalization, standardization, Commercialization or the spread of secularism. Amid the economic downturn and the softening of the labour market, calls are growing for better social security measures around the world. Today, the original welfare state of the 20th century has been replaced by a more competitive form in the 21st century, the so-called "non-sovereign power", which has attracted more and more attention in the global scope. But the influence of various social forces, such as NGOs, on daily life is still weak. Although there is a lag between international economic development and social policy formulation, the state power still has an important management function in the world in which the interests of transnational corporations are dominated. Under the circumstance that globalization has affected the social contract, the future of social welfare is difficult to choose, but it must develop towards the direction of commoditization of social service. In view of the challenges brought by justice and governance, the paper holds that the trend of market economy must be guided by moral principles that reflect the fundamental value of human beings, while the concepts of social welfare security need to be redefined and extended.
【作者單位】： 紐約佩斯大學(xué);Central
【分類號(hào)】：F045.5
，

本文編號(hào)：2117166