本文選題：方法論之爭　切入點(diǎn)：美國經(jīng)濟(jì)思想史　出處：《經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動態(tài)》2011年11期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：從19世紀(jì)70年代到20世紀(jì)40年代,美國經(jīng)濟(jì)思想史上發(fā)生過一場方法論之爭,爭論首先發(fā)生在受德國歷史學(xué)派影響的年輕一代美國經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家與信奉古典經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的老一代經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家之間,而后演變?yōu)橹贫戎髁x與新古典經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)兩個(gè)學(xué)術(shù)傳統(tǒng)之間的爭論。但這場爭論往往被忽視。本文分三個(gè)階段系統(tǒng)回顧了這場爭論的歷史,用科學(xué)知識社會學(xué)的方法評述了爭論的實(shí)質(zhì),并對爭論涉及的一些基本問題進(jìn)行了反思。
[Abstract]:From 1870s to 1940s, there was a controversy on methodology in the history of American economic thought. The debate first took place between the younger generation of American economists influenced by the German school of history and the older generation of economists who believed in classical economics. Then it evolved into an argument between institutionalism and neo-classical economics. But this argument is often ignored. This paper systematically reviews the history of this argument in three stages. In this paper, the essence of the argument is reviewed with the method of sociology of scientific knowledge, and some basic problems involved in the argument are reconsidered.
【作者單位】： 云南大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;
【分類號】：F091.3

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 呂瑞華;復(fù)雜經(jīng)濟(jì)系統(tǒng)混沌預(yù)測方法與多層局勢決策方法研究[D];天津大學(xué);2004年

2 文俊;區(qū)域水資源可持續(xù)利用預(yù)警系統(tǒng)研究[D];河海大學(xué);2006年

3 湯鐸鐸;中國經(jīng)濟(jì)周期波動的經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究：描述性事實(shí)和特征事實(shí)（1949～2006）[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2007年

，

本文編號：1562742