新自由主義、金融危機(jī)與資本主義模式的調(diào)整——美國(guó)模式、日本模式和瑞典模式的比較
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-02-08 12:27
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 新自由主義 金融危機(jī) 日本模式 瑞典模式 美國(guó)模式 出處:《經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家》2011年04期 論文類型:期刊論文
【摘要】:20世紀(jì)80年代,伴隨著新自由主義思潮的興起,發(fā)達(dá)資本主義國(guó)家的不同市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)模式集體轉(zhuǎn)向了新自由主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)模式。20世紀(jì)90年代,美國(guó)模式、日本模式和瑞典模式幾乎同時(shí)爆發(fā)了金融危機(jī)。美國(guó)模式對(duì)新自由主義政策進(jìn)行了短暫調(diào)整后,又重蹈覆轍;日本模式則在新自由主義模式與日本模式之間搖擺不定,其結(jié)果導(dǎo)致日本經(jīng)歷了"失去的二十年"。瑞典模式則在堅(jiān)持自身模式合理內(nèi)核的基礎(chǔ)上,弱化了新自由主義政策主張,迅速走出危機(jī),走向持續(xù)發(fā)展。2007年美國(guó)次貸危機(jī)標(biāo)志著新自由主義模式的終結(jié),可以預(yù)見,無(wú)論是美國(guó)模式、日本模式還是瑞典模式,都將在堅(jiān)持自身模式合理內(nèi)核的基礎(chǔ)上,更加注重向經(jīng)濟(jì)績(jī)效和社會(huì)績(jī)效均衡發(fā)展的方向調(diào)整。從本質(zhì)上看,無(wú)論哪種資本主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)模式,都無(wú)非是資本主義生產(chǎn)關(guān)系的一種調(diào)節(jié)形式而已,它們都無(wú)法從根本上克服資本主義基本矛盾帶來(lái)的經(jīng)濟(jì)周期律。
[Abstract]:In 1980s, with the rise of neoliberal trend of thought, the different market economic models of developed capitalist countries collectively turned to the neoliberal market economy model. 90s, the United States model, The financial crisis broke out in the Japanese model and the Swedish model at the same time. After a brief adjustment of neoliberal policy, the American model made the same mistake again, while the Japanese model wobbled between the neoliberal model and the Japanese model. As a result, Japan experienced a "lost 20 years". The Swedish model, on the basis of sticking to the rational core of its own model, weakened the neoliberal policy proposition and quickly emerged from the crisis. In 2007, the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States marked the end of the neoliberal model. It can be predicted that both the American model, the Japanese model and the Swedish model will adhere to the rational core of their own model. Pay more attention to the direction of balanced development of economic performance and social performance. In essence, whatever capitalist market economy model is nothing more than a form of adjustment of capitalist relations of production, None of them can fundamentally overcome the periodic law of the economy brought about by the fundamental contradictions of capitalism.
【作者單位】: 南開大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院經(jīng)濟(jì)系;
【基金】:“中央高;究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)資金資助項(xiàng)目——重點(diǎn)學(xué)科骨干人才資助項(xiàng)目”《馬克思主義經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)與當(dāng)代資本主義多樣性研究》成果,項(xiàng)目編號(hào):NKZXA10001
【分類號(hào)】:F039;F091.352
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 沈文瑋;劉鳳義;;金融危機(jī)與瑞典模式調(diào)整[J];教學(xué)與研究;2010年07期
2 胡希寧;克林頓經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)與美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)[J];w攣胖蕓,
本文編號(hào):1495442
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/jjsxs/1495442.html
最近更新
教材專著