本文選題：滬港通　切入點(diǎn)：兩地上市公司　出處：《暨南大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：AH兩地上市公司股票存在價(jià)差的問題在我國(guó)由來已久,許多學(xué)者一致認(rèn)為大陸香港兩地市場(chǎng)分割,資本流通受到限制導(dǎo)致套利者無法通過套利消除此種差異是AH兩地上市公司股票存在價(jià)差的主要原因。2014年11月17日,備受矚目的“滬港通”政策在這一天正式實(shí)施,“滬港通”政策允許大陸和香港的合格投資者互相買賣規(guī)定范圍內(nèi)的股票,滬港兩地上市的股票均在規(guī)定范圍之內(nèi)�！皽弁ā闭叩膶�(shí)施提高了內(nèi)地股市的有效性,是我國(guó)資本市場(chǎng)進(jìn)一步開放的重要舉措。本文基于倍差法,運(yùn)用AH兩地上市公司的股票和財(cái)務(wù)數(shù)據(jù),通過對(duì)兩地相對(duì)CAR和價(jià)差變化的研究,旨在探究“滬港通”政策實(shí)施的影響效果。滬港兩地上市的公司股票因在滬港通開通后可互相交易被稱為實(shí)驗(yàn)組,而深港兩地上市公司的股票在政策實(shí)施后不可進(jìn)行交易而成為天然的控制組。通過實(shí)證研究,本文發(fā)現(xiàn):(1)滬港通實(shí)施日使得實(shí)驗(yàn)組的兩地相對(duì)CAR比控制組的低約3%;(2)由于A股通常相對(duì)于H股溢價(jià),實(shí)驗(yàn)組公司兩地相對(duì)CAR的減小的主要原因是H股的CAR增大了;(3)“滬港通”政策在宣告日對(duì)AH兩地上市公司股票價(jià)格并未產(chǎn)生顯著的影響效應(yīng),因此資本融通是使得“滬港通”政策產(chǎn)生影響的最主要因素。
[Abstract]:There has been a long history of the spread between the shares of listed companies in AH and Hong Kong. Many scholars agree that the mainland and Hong Kong markets are divided.Restrictions on capital flows have prevented arbitrageurs from eliminating such differences through arbitrage, which is the main reason why there is a spread in the prices of AH dual-listed companies. On November 17, 2014, the high-profile "Stock Connect" policy was officially implemented.The Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect policy allows qualified investors from mainland China and Hong Kong to buy and sell each other's shares within specified limits.The implementation of the "Stock Connect between Shanghai and Hong Kong" policy has improved the effectiveness of the mainland stock market and is an important measure for the further opening of China's capital market.Based on the double difference method and using the stock and financial data of AH listed companies, this paper aims to explore the effect of the implementation of the "Stock Connect between Shanghai and Hong Kong" policy through the study of the relative CAR and the variation of the price difference between the two places.After the opening of the Stock Connect between Shanghai and Hong Kong, the shares of the listed companies in Shanghai and Hong Kong can be called the experimental group, while the shares of the companies listed in Shenzhen and Hong Kong cannot be traded after the implementation of the policy and become the natural control group.Through empirical research, we find that the day of implementation of the Stock Connect between Shanghai and Hong Kong makes the relative CAR of the experimental group about 3 / 2 lower than that of the control group) because A shares are usually at a premium to H shares.The main reason for the decrease of CAR in the two places of the experimental group is that the CAR of H shares increases) the "Stock Connect" policy of Shanghai and Hong Kong does not have a significant effect on the stock price of the two listed companies on the date of announcement.Therefore, capital financing is the most important factor that causes the policy of Stock Connect between Shanghai and Hong Kong.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F832.51

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馮永琦;段曉航;;“滬港通”對(duì)滬港股市聯(lián)動(dòng)效應(yīng)的影響[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革;2016年02期

2 李媛;吳菲菲;;A+H雙重上市公司股票價(jià)格差異與匯率變動(dòng)研究[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問題;2016年02期

3 嚴(yán)佳佳;郭瑋;黃文彬;;“滬港通”公告效應(yīng)比較研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2015年12期

4 孫寅浩;黃文凡;;為什么不收斂?——基于“滬港通”的A-H股價(jià)差實(shí)證研究[J];投資研究;2015年12期

5 曾玉華;虞晨鴻;張曉棠;;基于“滬港通”的我國(guó)資本市場(chǎng)有效性實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];時(shí)代金融;2015年05期

6 巴曙松;張信軍;;滬港通對(duì)跨境資本流動(dòng)的影響[J];中國(guó)金融;2014年18期

7 江百靈;葉文娛;;區(qū)際風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分擔(dān)與匯率風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因素:對(duì)AH股價(jià)差的一個(gè)新解釋[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2012年06期

8 朱彩婕;李莉;;A+H股同股不同價(jià)原因分析[J];山東財(cái)政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

9 曲保智;任力行;吳效宇;陳凌;;H股對(duì)A股的價(jià)格折讓及其影響因素研究[J];金融研究;2010年09期

10 汪貴浦;林婷婷;;中國(guó)上市公司A股和H股價(jià)格差異的實(shí)證分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2010年08期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 朱洪亮;趙景東;;基于“滬港通”背景下的市場(chǎng)均衡與價(jià)格波動(dòng)研究[A];2015年中國(guó)管理科學(xué)與工程研究報(bào)告[C];2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1729672