本文選題：公司透明度　切入點(diǎn)：股票流動(dòng)性　出處：《重慶大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著市場(chǎng)化改革的深入，信息透明越來(lái)越成為中國(guó)背景下研究的熱門(mén)話題。事實(shí)上，信息的透明不但有利于資源的有效配置，而且更有利于經(jīng)濟(jì)的穩(wěn)定持續(xù)發(fā)展。特別是對(duì)于資本市場(chǎng)而言，投資者的信心和整個(gè)市場(chǎng)活力都依賴(lài)于信息的公開(kāi)透明。由于流動(dòng)性和流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的改善將有助于公司投資價(jià)值的提高，因此，研究何種路徑能夠促進(jìn)流動(dòng)性和降低流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)就顯得尤為重要。 本文的研究主題是公司透明度、股票流動(dòng)性和流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。在理論上，信息透明度一方面可以通過(guò)減少投資者之間的逆向選擇問(wèn)題，進(jìn)而減少交易成本提高股票流動(dòng)性；另一方面，也可以減少公司價(jià)值的不確定性，進(jìn)而降低股票的流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。所以，從透明度的角度去尋找改進(jìn)股市活力的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)有很強(qiáng)的理論和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。結(jié)合中國(guó)市場(chǎng)特殊的制度背景，本文選擇了2003年至2011年中國(guó)滬深兩市A股上市公司為研究樣本。分別從盈余質(zhì)量、是否選擇國(guó)際四大、深交所綜合信息考評(píng)得分、分析師跟蹤人數(shù)、分析師盈余預(yù)測(cè)精度以及透明度綜合指標(biāo)TRANS六個(gè)角度全方位的度量了公司透明度。流動(dòng)性方面，，以股票日間交易數(shù)據(jù)構(gòu)造了兩個(gè)流動(dòng)性變量，分別是負(fù)零回報(bào)天數(shù)比例和負(fù)價(jià)格沖擊測(cè)度指標(biāo)。并在價(jià)格沖擊度量的流動(dòng)性基礎(chǔ)之上，計(jì)算了股票的流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。通過(guò)回歸分析，首先我們發(fā)現(xiàn)當(dāng)前更高的盈余質(zhì)量、更多的分析師跟蹤、更準(zhǔn)確的分析師盈余預(yù)測(cè)和國(guó)際四大審計(jì)同未來(lái)更高的股票流動(dòng)性相聯(lián)。其次，從以百分等級(jí)平均值構(gòu)建的透明度綜合指標(biāo)TRANS的回歸結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)，更高的公司信息透明度將為上市公司股票帶來(lái)更大的流動(dòng)性。進(jìn)一步研究還發(fā)現(xiàn)，透明度同個(gè)股流動(dòng)性的正相關(guān)關(guān)系在機(jī)構(gòu)投資者持股比例高的樣本組以及公司治理環(huán)境較差的樣本組中表現(xiàn)更明顯。對(duì)于個(gè)股的流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，回歸結(jié)果也顯示公司透明度與其存在顯著的負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系，并且兩者之間的負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系在機(jī)構(gòu)投資者持股比例高的樣本組和代理問(wèn)題嚴(yán)重的樣本組中表現(xiàn)更為明顯。 本研究從流動(dòng)性和流動(dòng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的角度，考察了公司透明的經(jīng)濟(jì)后果，對(duì)于監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)信息披露和發(fā)揮中介機(jī)構(gòu)功能具有一定的政策含義。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of market-oriented reform, information transparency has become a hot topic under the background of China. In fact, information transparency is not only conducive to the effective allocation of resources, And more conducive to the stable and sustainable development of the economy, especially for the capital markets, Investor confidence and market activity as a whole depend on openness and transparency of information. Since improved liquidity and liquidity risks will help increase the value of companies' investments, It is very important to study which path can promote liquidity and reduce liquidity risk. In theory, information transparency can improve stock liquidity by reducing the adverse selection problem among investors, and then reducing transaction costs. On the other hand, it can reduce the uncertainty of the company's value and thus reduce the liquidity risk of the stock. Looking for empirical evidence to improve the vitality of the stock market from the perspective of transparency has strong theoretical and practical significance.According to the special institutional background of the Chinese market, From 2003 to 2011, A share listed companies in China's Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets were selected as the research samples. The earnings quality, whether to choose the four international companies, the comprehensive information evaluation scores of Shenzhen Stock Exchange, the number of analysts tracking, In terms of liquidity, two liquidity variables are constructed from stock day trading data. The paper calculates the liquidity risk of the stock on the basis of the liquidity of the price shock measure. Through regression analysis, we find that the current higher earnings quality. More analyst tracking, more accurate analyst earnings forecasts and four international audits were linked to higher stock liquidity in the future. Greater transparency in corporate information will bring greater liquidity to listed companies' stocks. Further research has also found that. The positive correlation between transparency and individual stock liquidity is more obvious in the sample group with a high proportion of institutional investors holding shares and the sample group with a poor corporate governance environment. The regression results also show that there is a significant negative correlation between corporate transparency and corporate transparency, and the negative correlation between them is more obvious in the sample groups with high shareholding ratio of institutional investors and those with serious agency problems. From the perspective of liquidity and liquidity risk, this study examines the economic consequences of corporate transparency, which has certain policy implications for regulators to further strengthen information disclosure and play the role of intermediaries.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F832.51;F272.3;F275

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孔東民;邵園園;;盈余質(zhì)量機(jī)構(gòu)投資者和資產(chǎn)流動(dòng)性[J];國(guó)際金融研究;2011年10期

2 伊志宏;姜付秀;秦義虎;;產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)、公司治理與信息披露質(zhì)量[J];管理世界;2010年01期

3 張玉龍;李怡宗;;基于隨機(jī)折現(xiàn)因子方法的流動(dòng)性定價(jià)機(jī)制研究[J];管理世界;2013年10期

4 王春峰;韓冬;蔣祥林;;流動(dòng)性與股票回報(bào):基于上海股市的實(shí)證研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2002年24期

5 蘇冬蔚,麥元?jiǎng)?流動(dòng)性與資產(chǎn)定價(jià):基于我國(guó)股市資產(chǎn)換手率與預(yù)期收益的實(shí)證研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年02期

6 汪煒,蔣高峰;信息披露、透明度與資本成本[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年07期

7 魏明海,劉峰,施鯤翔;論會(huì)計(jì)透明度[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2001年09期

8 張程睿;王華;;公司信息透明度:經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究與未來(lái)展望[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2006年12期

9 譚勁松;宋順林;吳立揚(yáng);;公司透明度的決定因素——基于代理理論和信號(hào)理論的經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2010年04期

10 周開(kāi)國(guó);王建軍;;A、H股交叉上市能提高流動(dòng)性嗎?[J];證券市場(chǎng)導(dǎo)報(bào);2011年12期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 俞春江;公司透明度與盈余管理關(guān)系經(jīng)驗(yàn)檢驗(yàn)[D];廈門(mén)大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：1605181