本文選題：流動(dòng)性限制 + 經(jīng)濟(jì)增長��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2007年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本文的研究范圍是流動(dòng)性限制理論和經(jīng)濟(jì)增長理論。通過把流動(dòng)性限制的因素引入到經(jīng)濟(jì)增長理論的模型之中，本文討論了該因素對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的影響。文章首先分析了流動(dòng)性、流動(dòng)性限制的概念，對(duì)流動(dòng)性限制給予了嚴(yán)格的定義，，并指出金融市場中存在流動(dòng)性限制的表現(xiàn)和原因。然后文章概括了關(guān)于流動(dòng)性限制已有的理論研究，包括流動(dòng)性限制對(duì)消費(fèi)，投資，就業(yè)，國際經(jīng)濟(jì)，經(jīng)濟(jì)周期等等方面的影響，和有關(guān)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的理論；還對(duì)幾個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長理論的經(jīng)典模型進(jìn)行了修改和創(chuàng)新。具體方法是通過一些對(duì)流動(dòng)性限制的特殊定義將其引入索洛模型等幾個(gè)經(jīng)典經(jīng)濟(jì)增長模型之中，例如假設(shè)各個(gè)時(shí)刻的總產(chǎn)出總有一部分用于浪費(fèi)和流動(dòng)性限制帶來的損失，總產(chǎn)出的這一部分既沒有用來消費(fèi)也沒有用來生產(chǎn)，并將一直被社會(huì)浪費(fèi)或閑置，以此來代表流動(dòng)性限制，考察它在經(jīng)濟(jì)增長過程中的作用。文章得出的結(jié)論是流動(dòng)性限制對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長有負(fù)面作用，在Ramsey-Cass-Koopmans模型中，流動(dòng)性限制的增加對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)帶來的影響類似于折舊率升高和政府開支增加的影響，降低一個(gè)市場的流動(dòng)性限制將對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長起到推動(dòng)作用，并說明流動(dòng)性限制能對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長問題中關(guān)于地區(qū)貧富差距的問題有一定解釋作用。該結(jié)論證明了我國發(fā)展健全金融市場的必要性。最后，本文對(duì)我國金融市場面臨的流動(dòng)性限制問題進(jìn)行了簡單分析，指出缺乏直接融資渠道，間接融資渠道效率低下，個(gè)人信用制度不健全，信息傳導(dǎo)不暢等問題都是導(dǎo)致流動(dòng)性限制的原因，并指出解決金融市場的這些問題同樣會(huì)對(duì)我國的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長做出正面的貢獻(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:The research scope of this paper is liquidity restriction theory and economic growth theory. By introducing the factor of liquidity restriction into the model of economic growth theory, this paper discusses the influence of this factor on economic growth. This paper first analyzes the concepts of liquidity and liquidity restrictions, and gives a strict definition of liquidity restrictions, and points out the performance and reasons of liquidity restrictions in financial markets. Then the paper summarizes the existing theoretical research on liquidity restrictions, including the impact of liquidity restrictions on consumption, investment, employment, international economy, economic cycle, and the theory of economic growth; In addition, several classical models of economic growth theory are modified and innovated. The specific method is to introduce some special definitions of liquidity constraints into several classical economic growth models such as Solow model, for example, assuming that the total output at every moment is always used for waste and loss caused by liquidity restrictions. This part of total output is neither used for consumption nor for production, and will always be wasted or idle by society to represent the limitation of liquidity, and to examine its role in the process of economic growth. In the Ramsey-Cass-Koopmans model, the effects of increased liquidity restrictions on the economy are similar to those of higher depreciation rates and higher government spending. Reducing liquidity restrictions on a market will boost economic growth, and explain that liquidity restrictions can explain the gap between the rich and the poor in economic growth. The conclusion proves the necessity of developing a sound financial market in China. Finally, this paper analyzes the liquidity limitation in our financial market, and points out that the lack of direct financing channels, the inefficiency of indirect financing channels, and the imperfection of personal credit system. Problems such as poor transmission of information are the causes of liquidity restrictions, and it is pointed out that solving these problems in financial markets will also make a positive contribution to China's economic growth.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號(hào)】：F061.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 齊天翔;經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)軌時(shí)期的中國居民儲(chǔ)蓄研究——兼論不確定性與居民儲(chǔ)蓄的關(guān)系[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2000年09期

2 葉海云;試論流動(dòng)性約束、短視行為與我國消費(fèi)需求疲軟的關(guān)系[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2000年11期

本文編號(hào)：2103572