【摘要】：自1999年國家提出西部大開發(fā)戰(zhàn)略以來，實施西部大開發(fā)已歷15個年頭，，從表面看西部地區(qū)整體的經(jīng)濟發(fā)展水平、基礎設施水平和人民生活水平都得到了顯著提高，城鎮(zhèn)化水平較之前也邁上了新的臺階；在國家提出新型城鎮(zhèn)化發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略之際，本文作者應用新型城鎮(zhèn)化的發(fā)展要求對西部地區(qū)城鎮(zhèn)化發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀進行測評，計算得出西部地區(qū)新型城鎮(zhèn)化質(zhì)量水平并對其進行分析與評價。 本論文采用定性分析與定量研究相結(jié)合的方法對論文主題進行研究。首先運用定性分析方法對西部地區(qū)城鎮(zhèn)化進程推進現(xiàn)狀作出概述，就人口城鎮(zhèn)化水平、城鎮(zhèn)基礎設施建設情況、城鎮(zhèn)綜合承載力和城鄉(xiāng)居民生活水平4個方面與中東部地區(qū)進行對比分析，認為西部地區(qū)總體城鎮(zhèn)化水平與中東部地區(qū)存在差距。 在相關(guān)城鎮(zhèn)化質(zhì)量文獻研究的基礎上，依據(jù)新型城鎮(zhèn)化質(zhì)量的內(nèi)涵構(gòu)建出西部地區(qū)新型城鎮(zhèn)化質(zhì)量評價指標體系，搜集西部12個地區(qū)、24項變量指標的原始數(shù)據(jù)，應用SPSS統(tǒng)計軟件和主成分分析模型計算得出西部各地區(qū)的各主成分質(zhì)量得分和綜合質(zhì)量得分，對各得分值排序并依據(jù)新型城鎮(zhèn)化質(zhì)量等級評價標準劃定各地區(qū)的新型城鎮(zhèn)化質(zhì)量等級水平，繪制出西部地區(qū)新型城鎮(zhèn)化質(zhì)量水平等級空間分布圖，對各地區(qū)的質(zhì)量水平進行分析得出西部地區(qū)新型城鎮(zhèn)化質(zhì)量在區(qū)際間發(fā)展非常不均衡，存在巨大區(qū)際差異，因此進一步逐項分析得出產(chǎn)生區(qū)際差異的原因；依據(jù)新型城鎮(zhèn)化質(zhì)量水平差異分析的原因，在新型城鎮(zhèn)化進程推進的大背景下，有針對性的給出提升西部地區(qū)城鎮(zhèn)化質(zhì)量水平的發(fā)展對策。
[Abstract]:Since the state put forward the strategy of developing the western region in 1999, it has been 15 years since the implementation of the large-scale development of the western region. On the surface, the level of economic development, the level of infrastructure and the standard of living of the people in the western region as a whole have been significantly improved. The level of urbanization has also advanced to a new level; When the country puts forward the new urbanization development strategy, the author applies the new urbanization development request to the western region urbanization development present situation to carry on the appraisal. The quality level of new urbanization in western China is calculated and analyzed and evaluated. In this paper, qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis are used to study the theme of the thesis. First of all, the qualitative analysis method is used to summarize the current situation of the urbanization process in the western region, and the level of population urbanization and the construction of urban infrastructure. The comprehensive carrying capacity of cities and towns and the living standards of urban and rural residents are compared with those of the central and eastern regions, and it is concluded that there is a gap between the overall urbanization level in the western region and the central and eastern regions. On the basis of the research on the quality of urbanization, based on the connotation of the new urbanization quality, the evaluation index system of the new urbanization quality in the western region is constructed, and the original data of 24 variable indexes in 12 western regions are collected. By using SPSS software and principal component analysis model, the principal component quality score and comprehensive quality score of each region in western China were calculated. According to the new urbanization quality grade evaluation standard, the new urbanization quality grade level of each region is determined, and the spatial distribution map of the new urbanization quality level grade in the western region is drawn. By analyzing the quality level of each region, it is found that the development of the new urbanization quality in the western region is very uneven among different regions, and there are huge inter-regional differences, so the reasons for the inter-regional differences are obtained by further analysis. Based on the analysis of the reasons for the difference of the quality level of the new type of urbanization, under the background of the advancement of the new type of urbanization, the development countermeasures of improving the quality of urbanization in the western region are put forward.
【學位授予單位】：重慶交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F299.21

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 歐名豪,李武艷,劉向南,諶明;區(qū)域城市化水平的綜合測度研究——以江蘇省為例[J];長江流域資源與環(huán)境;2004年05期

2 王家庭;唐袁;;我國城市化質(zhì)量測度的實證研究[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2009年12期

3 冉啟秀;周兵;;新型工業(yè)化和新型城鎮(zhèn)化協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展研究——基于重慶市全國統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)綜合配套改革試驗區(qū)的實證[J];重慶工商大學學報(西部論壇);2008年02期

4 陳曉紅,李城固;我國城市化與城鄉(xiāng)一體化研究[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2004年02期

5 于濤;張京祥;羅小龍;;我國東部發(fā)達地區(qū)縣級市城市化質(zhì)量研究——以江蘇省常熟市為例[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2010年11期

6 石憶邵;城鄉(xiāng)一體化理論與實踐:回眸與評析[J];城市規(guī)劃匯刊;2003年01期

7 徐素;于濤;巫強;;區(qū)域視角下中國縣級市城市化質(zhì)量評估體系研究——以長三角地區(qū)為例[J];國際城市規(guī)劃;2011年01期

8 盧洪靖;;我國城市化質(zhì)量評估體系研究——以安徽省為例[J];赤峰學院學報(自然科學版);2013年05期

9 靳美娟;;陜西省城市化質(zhì)量評價[J];河南科學;2012年01期

10 楊梅;;基于熵值法的武漢城市圈城鎮(zhèn)化質(zhì)量分析[J];江漢大學學報(社會科學版);2011年06期

本文編號：2364742