本文關(guān)鍵詞： 相關(guān)市場 雙邊市場 替代性分析 SSNIP測試　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：相關(guān)市場界定是反壟斷的起點。隨著雙邊市場條件下反壟斷糾紛的頻繁出現(xiàn),雙邊市場條件下相關(guān)市場界定問題成為了焦點。由于我國現(xiàn)行反壟斷制度未對雙邊市場的相關(guān)市場界定問題進行規(guī)定,導(dǎo)致司法實踐在相關(guān)市場界定問題上陷入了困境。鑒于此,筆者對雙邊市場條件下相關(guān)市場界定的困境進行闡述,并且在閱讀域外制度和案例的基礎(chǔ)上,提出自己對這一問題的解決思路。 文章根據(jù)“提出問題——制度概述——司法困境——域外經(jīng)驗——完善建議”的寫作思路,對雙邊市場條件下相關(guān)市場界定進行闡述,文章分為五個部分。 第一部分為引言,介紹了本文的寫作意義、文獻綜述和創(chuàng)新點。以奇虎訴騰訊濫用市場支配地位一案為切入點,提出了雙邊市場條件下相關(guān)市場界定這一問題。 第二部分闡述了雙邊市場的基本理論和相關(guān)市場的一般理論。與傳統(tǒng)的單邊市場相比,雙邊市場從產(chǎn)生機制、運行方式以及定價策略上存在著特殊之處。正是由于雙邊市場的這些特點,傳統(tǒng)的相關(guān)市場界定方法無法直接適用到雙邊市場中,但是雙邊市場條件下相關(guān)市場界定又是至關(guān)重要的,因此該問題需要進行進一步的探討,尋求相應(yīng)的解決措施。 第三部分論述了我國雙邊市場條件下相關(guān)市場界定面臨四種困境,即雙邊市場條件下相關(guān)市場界定的模糊化、孤立看待雙邊市場的子市場、替代性分析的隨意化以及SSNIP測試失效。同時,該部分分別解釋了四種困境產(chǎn)生的原因和弊端所在。 第四部分介紹了域外對雙邊市場條件下相關(guān)市場界定的制度和司法實踐。筆者將對這些國家制度和司法實踐展開論述。域外的反壟斷執(zhí)法機構(gòu)在這些案件中對相關(guān)市場界定中充分考慮了雙邊市場的性質(zhì),分別從兩個市場進行替代性分析,靈活使用SSNIP測試,并考慮對競爭的影響,這種處理方式對如何走出我國所處困境具有借鑒意義。 第五部分對我國雙邊市場條件下相關(guān)市場的界定提出建議。筆者在借鑒域外的解決方式和總結(jié)學(xué)者們的建議的基礎(chǔ)上,對我國雙邊市場條件下相關(guān)市場界定問題提出了建議。
[Abstract]:The definition of relevant market is the starting point of antitrust. With the frequent emergence of antitrust disputes under bilateral market conditions, Under the condition of bilateral market, the definition of relevant market has become the focus. As the current antitrust system of our country does not regulate the definition of relevant market in bilateral market, In view of this, the author expounds the dilemma of the definition of relevant market under the condition of bilateral market, and on the basis of reading the extraterritorial system and cases, Put forward their own solutions to this problem. According to the writing idea of "asking questions-Overview of system-Judicial Dilemma-Extra-territorial experience-perfect suggestions", this paper expounds the definition of relevant market under the condition of bilateral market, and the article is divided into five parts. The first part is the introduction, which introduces the significance, literature review and innovation of this paper. Based on the case of Qihu v. Tencent abusing its dominant position in the market, this paper puts forward the problem of defining the relevant market under the condition of bilateral market. The second part expounds the basic theory of bilateral market and the general theory of related market. Because of these characteristics of the bilateral market, the traditional method of defining the relevant market can not be directly applied to the bilateral market. However, it is very important to define the relevant market under the condition of bilateral market. The third part discusses four kinds of difficulties in the definition of the relevant market under the condition of bilateral market in China, namely, the ambiguity of the definition of the relevant market under the condition of bilateral market, and the isolation of the sub-market of the bilateral market. The randomness of alternative analysis and the failure of SSNIP test. At the same time, this part explains the causes and disadvantages of the four dilemmas. Part 4th introduces the system and judicial practice of defining the relevant market under the condition of bilateral market. The author will discuss the system and judicial practice of these countries. The nature of bilateral markets is fully taken into account in the definition of relevant markets, The alternative analysis from the two markets, the flexible use of SSNIP test, and the consideration of the impact on the competition are of reference to how to get out of the dilemma of our country. In the 5th part, the author puts forward some suggestions on the definition of relevant market under the condition of bilateral market in China. On the basis of drawing lessons from the overseas solutions and summing up the suggestions of scholars, the author puts forward some suggestions on the definition of relevant market under the condition of bilateral market in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F123.9

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王曉曄;美國企業(yè)橫向合并指南(續(xù))——1992年4月2日發(fā)布[J];外國法譯評;1996年03期

2 ;美國企業(yè)橫向合并指南[J];外國法譯評;1996年02期

3 李劍;;反壟斷法中核心設(shè)施的界定標準——相關(guān)市場的視角[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2009年03期

4 韓偉;;美國《橫向合并指南》的最新修訂及啟示[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2011年03期

5 丁茂中;;美國反壟斷法中界定“相關(guān)市場”的臨界損失分析法[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2008年06期

6 李姍,黃妍;注意力經(jīng)濟——網(wǎng)絡(luò)營銷的實質(zhì)[J];湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2005年S1期

7 張志奇;;相關(guān)市場界定的方法及其缺陷[J];北京行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年04期

8 楊東;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)信息服務(wù)市場支配地位的認定及法律調(diào)整[J];政法論壇;2012年01期

9 金朝武;論相關(guān)市場的界定原則和方法[J];中國法學(xué);2001年04期

10 王為農(nóng);許小凡;;大型零售企業(yè)濫用優(yōu)勢地位的反壟斷規(guī)制問題研究——基于雙邊市場理論的視角[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2011年05期

，

本文編號：1536685