發(fā)布時間：2017-12-31 10:10

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：山西省新農(nóng)村建設(shè)績效測度與評價　出處：《山西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 新農(nóng)村建設(shè) 績效測度 幸福指數(shù) 因子分析

【摘要】：在2005年十月份召開的黨的十六屆五中全會上,提出要按照生產(chǎn)發(fā)展、生活寬裕、鄉(xiāng)風(fēng)文明、村容整潔、管理民主五個方面的要求建設(shè)社會主義新農(nóng)村,但是由于每一個省份的資源配置情況不同,在新農(nóng)村建設(shè)進程中所面臨的困難也各不相同,所以每個省份采取的建設(shè)思路、建設(shè)方式以及建設(shè)的側(cè)重點也各不相同。近幾年來,山西省作為中部地區(qū)較為典型的能源大省,立足本省實際,因地制宜,不斷探索符合山西自身特點的新農(nóng)村建設(shè)模式,并加以完善。與此同時,設(shè)立山西省國家資源型經(jīng)濟轉(zhuǎn)型綜合配套改革試驗區(qū)之后,為山西省的長遠(yuǎn)快速發(fā)展提供了比較好的政策環(huán)境,拓寬了山西的發(fā)展空間,并且在項目引進等方面提供了格外寶貴的機遇。因此,在歷經(jīng)幾年的推動與深化之后,非常有必要對山西省新農(nóng)村建設(shè)的實際效果進行評估與了解。 文章以山西省為研究對象,對山西省的11個市的村莊進行抽樣調(diào)查,按照“類型到、地市到、年度到”的原則,結(jié)合試點村／推進村、定點觀測村、收入三個條件每個地級市選取3個村莊,共選取33個村莊495戶農(nóng)戶進行實地調(diào)研。此外,充分了解與學(xué)習(xí)國內(nèi)、國外的新農(nóng)村建設(shè)實踐,從山西省的實際出發(fā),以因地制宜、科學(xué)合理為原則,分別構(gòu)建了山西省新農(nóng)村建設(shè)評價指標(biāo)體系以及農(nóng)民幸福感評價指標(biāo)體系,以山西省2012年統(tǒng)計年鑒、各市統(tǒng)計公報及調(diào)研數(shù)據(jù)為數(shù)據(jù)來源,采用因子分析法,運用SPSS17.0對指標(biāo)數(shù)據(jù)進行分析,進而對山西省11個地級市2011年的新農(nóng)村建設(shè)水平從橫向上進行比較。 分析結(jié)果表明,山西省新農(nóng)村建設(shè)水平從總體上而言差異較大(11個地級市中新農(nóng)村建設(shè)水平最高得分為0.4757,最低得分為-0.5487),一般而言,經(jīng)濟發(fā)展情況比較好的地區(qū)新農(nóng)村建設(shè)情況也比較好;而山西省11個市的農(nóng)民幸福感居于71.55%-60.28%之間,屬于比較幸福的階段,總體而言,績效水平較高的地區(qū),農(nóng)民幸福感也較高,績效水平較低的地區(qū),農(nóng)民幸福感也較低。與此之外,通過對山西省新農(nóng)村建設(shè)水平的評價分析,找出發(fā)展過程中存在的諸如空心村現(xiàn)象嚴(yán)重、醫(yī)療教育問題突顯、農(nóng)民主體意識薄弱等問題,并提出了一些政策建議。
[Abstract]:At the Fifth Plenary session of the 16 CPC Central Committee held in October 2005, it was proposed to build a new socialist countryside in accordance with the requirements of the five aspects of production development, rich living, civilization in the countryside, clean and tidy villages and democratic management. However, due to the different allocation of resources in each province, the difficulties in the process of new rural construction are also different, so each province adopts the construction ideas. In recent years, Shanxi Province, as a typical energy province in the central region, based on the reality of the province, according to local conditions. At the same time, after the establishment of Shanxi Province national resource-based economic transformation comprehensive reform pilot area. For the long-term rapid development of Shanxi Province to provide a relatively good policy environment, broaden the space for Shanxi's development, and in the introduction of projects and other aspects to provide a particularly valuable opportunity. After several years' promotion and deepening, it is necessary to evaluate and understand the actual effect of Shanxi's new rural construction. This article takes Shanxi Province as the research object, carries on the sample investigation to the Shanxi Province 11 cities villages, according to the principle of "type to, place city to, year to", unifies the pilot village / the propulsion village, the fixed spot observation village. Three conditions of income each prefecture-level city selected 3 villages, a total of 33 villages selected 495 households for field research. In addition, fully understand and learn from the domestic and foreign new rural construction practice. Based on the reality of Shanxi Province, the evaluation index system of new rural construction and the evaluation index system of farmers' well-being are constructed in accordance with local conditions and scientific and reasonable principles. Taking the 2012 Statistical Yearbook of Shanxi Province, the statistical bulletin of each city and the survey data as the data source, using factor analysis method, using SPSS17.0 to analyze the index data. In 2011, the new rural construction level of 11 prefectural cities in Shanxi Province was compared horizontally. The results show that the level of new rural construction in Shanxi Province is quite different in general (the highest score of new rural construction level is 0.4757 in 11 prefecture-level cities and the lowest score is -0.5487). Generally speaking, the new rural construction in the areas where the economic development is better is also relatively good. The well-being of farmers in 11 cities of Shanxi Province is between 71.55- 60.28%, which belongs to the relatively happy stage. In general, the farmers' well-being is also higher in the areas with higher performance level. In the areas where the performance level is low, the farmers' happiness is also low. In addition, through the evaluation and analysis of the level of new rural construction in Shanxi Province, we can find out that the phenomenon of hollow village is serious in the process of development. The problem of medical education is prominent, the consciousness of farmers is weak, and some policy suggestions are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F320.3;F224

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林文;侯云先;王志娟;;全國新農(nóng)村建設(shè)綜合評價研究[J];北京郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年04期

2 張廣勝;鄒順橋;;新農(nóng)村建設(shè)績效檢驗及評價——基于對遼寧45個鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)新農(nóng)村建設(shè)情況的調(diào)查[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2012年07期

3 過建春;劉艷;;對中國社會主義新農(nóng)村評價指標(biāo)體系的初步探討[J];發(fā)展;2006年10期

4 何春花;盧秀霞;張曉梅;;河南省新農(nóng)村建設(shè)的因子分析與評價[J];河南科學(xué);2011年10期

5 李忠富;鄒心勇;求索;;建設(shè)社會主義新農(nóng)村評價指標(biāo)體系的研究[J];建筑管理現(xiàn)代化;2006年04期

6 溫鐵軍;;新農(nóng)村建設(shè)新在哪里?[J];決策與信息;2006年04期

7 張磊;;新農(nóng)村建設(shè)評價指標(biāo)體系研究[J];經(jīng)濟縱橫;2009年07期

8 李秀霞;劉雁;;社會主義新農(nóng)村評價體系研究[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟;2006年11期

9 李廣海;陳通;趙言濤;徐大立;;和諧社會理念的新農(nóng)村評價指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建[J];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年01期

10 魏富軍;;甘肅省農(nóng)民幸福狀況的統(tǒng)計學(xué)模型構(gòu)建研究[J];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年01期

，

本文編號：1359306