本文選題：媒體監(jiān)督 + 內(nèi)部控制�。� 參考：《天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：兩權(quán)分離使得公司治理成為當(dāng)前學(xué)術(shù)界的熱點(diǎn)話題。管理層在職消費(fèi)作為公司治理問題是指管理層利用自己對(duì)公司的實(shí)際控制權(quán),在企業(yè)運(yùn)營(yíng)過程中以職務(wù)之便而過度利己,在增加代理成本的同時(shí)損害了股東和企業(yè)利益。此外,由于在職消費(fèi)披露的非強(qiáng)制性,計(jì)量難度大,這也為管理層在職消費(fèi)提供了條件。企業(yè)高管在職消費(fèi)既具備動(dòng)機(jī)又具備條件,使其成為了現(xiàn)代公司治理中的燙手山芋。針對(duì)這個(gè)問題,學(xué)術(shù)界也展開了熱烈的討論,探究對(duì)這個(gè)普遍存在的問題的解決之道。目前的學(xué)術(shù)研究主要集中在法律和制度層面,但是由于我國(guó)法律和制度尚處于建設(shè)中,有相當(dāng)一部分并不完善,因此完全依賴法律和制度來解決管理層的在職消費(fèi)并非明智之舉。新世紀(jì)以來科技進(jìn)步帶來了媒體行業(yè)的蓬勃發(fā)展,媒體在現(xiàn)代公司治理中發(fā)揮的積極作用引起了公眾和學(xué)者的廣泛關(guān)注,這也為我們解決管理層在職消費(fèi)問題提供了新的思路。此外,為了研究問題的全面性,本文還研究了公司內(nèi)部治理機(jī)制對(duì)在職消費(fèi)的影響。從外部治理機(jī)制和內(nèi)部治理機(jī)制兩個(gè)方面探討了管理層在職消費(fèi),并為問題的解決提出了建設(shè)性的建議。在充分了解當(dāng)前的經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境和研究背景的前提下,本文首先梳理了目前學(xué)者們的研究成果,分析當(dāng)前針對(duì)該問題研究的缺口,總結(jié)本文的研究意義。然后對(duì)相關(guān)理論概念和理論基礎(chǔ)加以闡述,選取2010-2014年度A股上市公司作為研究樣本,進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析,綜合運(yùn)用多種統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法,例如描述性統(tǒng)計(jì)、回歸分析、穩(wěn)健性檢驗(yàn)等,驗(yàn)證了媒體監(jiān)督、內(nèi)部控制機(jī)制能有效抑制國(guó)有上市公司高管超額在職消費(fèi)的研究假設(shè)。并得出本文的結(jié)論,對(duì)相關(guān)問題的解決提出建議。
[Abstract]:The separation of two rights makes corporate governance a hot topic in current academic circles. As a corporate governance problem, management on-the-job consumption refers to the management taking advantage of their actual control over the company and taking advantage of their position in the course of business operation, thus increasing the agency cost and harming the interests of shareholders and enterprises at the same time. In addition, due to the non-mandatory disclosure of on-the-job consumption, it is difficult to measure, which also provides conditions for the management of on-the-job consumption. Corporate executives'on-job consumption has both motivation and conditions, making it a hot potato in modern corporate governance. In response to this problem, the academic community also launched a heated discussion to explore the solution to this widespread problem. At present, academic research is mainly focused on the level of law and system. However, due to the fact that China's laws and systems are still under construction, some of them are not perfect. So it is not wise to rely solely on laws and institutions to address management's spending on the job. Since the new century, the progress of science and technology has brought about the vigorous development of the media industry, and the positive role of the media in the modern corporate governance has aroused the widespread concern of the public and scholars, which also provides a new way of thinking for us to solve the problem of management's in-service consumption. In addition, in order to study the comprehensiveness of the problem, this paper also studies the influence of corporate internal governance mechanism on on-the-job consumption. This paper probes into the management's in-service consumption from two aspects of external governance mechanism and internal governance mechanism, and puts forward constructive suggestions for solving the problem. On the premise of fully understanding the current economic environment and research background, this paper firstly combs the current research results of scholars, analyzes the gaps in the current research on this issue, and summarizes the significance of this paper. Then the related theoretical concepts and theoretical basis are expounded, A shares listed companies in 2010-2014 are selected as the research samples, and empirical analysis is carried out, and comprehensive use of various statistical methods, such as descriptive statistics, regression analysis, robustness test, etc. It verifies the hypothesis that the media supervision and internal control mechanism can effectively restrain the over-on-the-job consumption of senior executives in state-owned listed companies. And draw the conclusion of this paper, and put forward some suggestions to solve the related problems.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：F275;F832.51

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 畢征;;論媒體監(jiān)督對(duì)司法之影響[J];企業(yè)導(dǎo)報(bào);2012年13期

2 賈鑫鑫;;淺析新聞媒體監(jiān)督與上市公司的信息公開[J];企業(yè)家天地;2006年02期

3 馬靜;胡凱;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒體監(jiān)督——信息時(shí)代的雙刃劍[J];時(shí)代經(jīng)貿(mào);2006年06期

4 王麗娜;;媒體監(jiān)督與企業(yè)的社會(huì)責(zé)任[J];新聞愛好者;2011年16期

5 劉宏明;;當(dāng)前我國(guó)媒體監(jiān)督的困境及其原因與對(duì)策分析[J];中國(guó)報(bào)業(yè);2012年02期

6 張徑偉;郭晴;;構(gòu)建新聞媒體監(jiān)督機(jī)制的研究[J];中國(guó)報(bào)業(yè);2012年10期

7 翁靈娜;;記者“醫(yī)者”心——對(duì)媒體監(jiān)督的反思[J];中國(guó)報(bào)業(yè);2013年06期

8 耿聯(lián);;媒體監(jiān)督,莫變成資本牟利的“推手”[J];傳媒觀察;2013年07期

9 周文然;;基于公司治理視角的媒體監(jiān)督機(jī)制研究[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年09期

10 劉時(shí)泉;;媒體監(jiān)督與法律環(huán)境對(duì)公司投資行為的影響:互補(bǔ)還是替代[J];金融教育研究;2013年06期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 楊麗莉;;論媒體監(jiān)督與司法審判的平衡[A];中國(guó)傳媒大學(xué)第七屆全國(guó)新聞學(xué)與傳播學(xué)博士生學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 本報(bào)特約評(píng)論員 曹林;接受媒體監(jiān)督：應(yīng)該“依法”,而非“正確”[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

2 閻庚倫 江蘇省灌南縣人大常委會(huì);人大運(yùn)用媒體監(jiān)督“四要”[N];人民代表報(bào);2010年

3 上海市工商局徐匯分局凌云(長(zhǎng)橋)工商所 張U喦，

本文編號(hào)：1955117