本文選題：農(nóng)民土地價值觀 + 土地利用行為　； 參考：《甘肅農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：土地是進行各種經(jīng)濟活動的空間載體,其利用和管理方式與國家經(jīng)濟社會發(fā)展息息相關(guān)。隨著我國進入經(jīng)濟發(fā)展新常態(tài),經(jīng)濟增速換擋、經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化、動力轉(zhuǎn)化要求對國土資源供需做出調(diào)整。從微觀的土地利用尺度來講,土地資源管理部門作為決策主體需要對土地利用與管理政策做出適當(dāng)調(diào)整與創(chuàng)新;在農(nóng)用地利用方面,如何與典型地區(qū)長期以來形成的穩(wěn)定的土地利用現(xiàn)狀相銜接,與土地經(jīng)營主體的價值觀及地域文化環(huán)境相一致,是實現(xiàn)農(nóng)地資源優(yōu)化配置重要途徑,為新常態(tài)經(jīng)濟背景下土地利用管理策略的研究提供依據(jù)。中國作為一個農(nóng)業(yè)大國、人口大國,糧食安全始終是一個關(guān)系國計民生的問題。改革開放以來,隨著農(nóng)地關(guān)系的不斷改革,農(nóng)民土地價值觀隨之變遷,農(nóng)村社會經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)發(fā)生巨大轉(zhuǎn)變,表現(xiàn)為勞動力大量轉(zhuǎn)移、農(nóng)民兼業(yè)化現(xiàn)象普遍,導(dǎo)致土地資源利用不充分,而目前農(nóng)業(yè)種植結(jié)構(gòu)的調(diào)整亟待完善。因此說,農(nóng)業(yè)種植結(jié)構(gòu)的調(diào)整對糧食安全的實現(xiàn)具有重要意義。另一方面,耕地非農(nóng)化過度的現(xiàn)實條件下,農(nóng)業(yè)種植結(jié)構(gòu)的調(diào)整顯得尤為重要。而農(nóng)業(yè)種植結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整與農(nóng)戶土地利用行為有直接的聯(lián)系,農(nóng)戶既是決策的執(zhí)行者又作為其自身行為決策者而被高度關(guān)注。為了更好的了解農(nóng)戶行為動機及行為特征,本文在行為經(jīng)濟學(xué)視角下,以農(nóng)民土地價值觀為啟點,以農(nóng)民所處社會環(huán)境為背景,構(gòu)建農(nóng)戶土地利用行為決策理論框架(第二章),基于大樣本實證調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)及其信、效度檢驗(第三章),在對農(nóng)民土地價值觀異質(zhì)性進行研究(第四章)的基礎(chǔ)上,采用定性研究與定量研究相結(jié)合的方式,對農(nóng)戶土地利用行為特征及其發(fā)展變化進行研究,運用計量經(jīng)濟模型對農(nóng)民土地價值觀于農(nóng)戶土地利用行為的影響進行分析(第五章),對所提出理論框架進行驗證,明晰農(nóng)戶行為特征及其演變規(guī)律。通過本文研究,得出以下主要結(jié)論:(1)所提出農(nóng)民土地價值觀概念模型合理,與研究數(shù)據(jù)達到適配。所采用量表具有良好的信度與效度;農(nóng)民土地價值觀4維度為:情感價值(F1)、保障價值(F2)、財富價值(F3)、權(quán)利價值(F4)。(2)農(nóng)民土地價值觀具有顯著的群體-區(qū)域差異性特征。不同個體特征和農(nóng)地經(jīng)營特征條件下,農(nóng)民土地價值觀存在群體差異,并且表現(xiàn)在地域空間上形成區(qū)域分異特征規(guī)律。(3)在大尺度空間區(qū)域,農(nóng)民土地價值觀表現(xiàn)出空間異質(zhì)性,各維度在總體格局與內(nèi)在關(guān)系上存在明顯分異。農(nóng)民土地價值觀空間集聚不明顯,區(qū)域間輻射帶動作用不強,空間差異顯著。(4)農(nóng)戶土地利用行為受到啟發(fā)式認知偏差的影響,符合行為經(jīng)濟學(xué)一般規(guī)律。參考點選擇、收益損失判斷會影響農(nóng)戶行為模式的發(fā)展與變化。(5)農(nóng)民土地價值觀對農(nóng)戶土地利用行為影響顯著。農(nóng)民土地價值觀不同維度分異特征下農(nóng)戶土地利用行為存在差異,農(nóng)戶土地利用行為具有行為經(jīng)濟學(xué)特征。
[Abstract]:Land is the space carrier for various economic activities, and its utilization and management are closely related to the national economic and social development. As China enters the new normal of economic development, the economic growth rate shifts, the economic structure is optimized, and the power transformation demands to adjust the supply and demand of land and resources. From the microcosmic scale of land use, land resource management department, as the main body of decision-making, needs to make appropriate adjustment and innovation to the land use and management policy. How to link up with the stable land use situation formed for a long time in typical areas, the values of the main body of land management and the regional cultural environment, is an important way to realize the optimal allocation of farmland resources. To provide the basis for the study of land use management strategy under the new normal economic background. As a large agricultural country and a large population, China's food security has always been a matter of national economy and people's livelihood. Since the reform and opening up, with the continuous reform of the relationship between agricultural land, farmers' land values have changed, the social and economic structure of rural areas has undergone a huge change, manifested in a large number of transfer of labor force, and the phenomenon of farmers' concurrent employment is widespread. As a result, land resources are not fully utilized, and the adjustment of agricultural planting structure needs to be improved. Therefore, the adjustment of agricultural planting structure is of great significance to the realization of food security. On the other hand, the adjustment of agricultural planting structure is particularly important under the realistic condition of non-agricultural conversion of cultivated land. However, the adjustment of agricultural planting structure is directly related to the land use behavior of farmers, and farmers are highly concerned both as decision makers and as decision makers of their own behavior. In order to better understand the behavior motivation and behavior characteristics of farmers, this paper, from the perspective of behavioral economics, takes the values of farmers' land as the starting point and the social environment of farmers as the background. In chapter 2, based on the large sample of empirical survey data and its reliability, validity test (chapter 3), the author studies the heterogeneity of farmers' land values (chapter 4). By combining qualitative and quantitative studies, the characteristics of farmers' land use behaviors and their development and changes are studied. This paper uses econometric model to analyze the influence of farmers' land values on farmers' land use behavior (Chapter 5), validates the proposed theoretical framework, and clarifies the characteristics of farmers' behavior and its evolution law. Through the research of this paper, we draw the following main conclusion: 1) the conceptual model of farmers' land values is reasonable, which is suitable for the research data. The scale has good reliability and validity, and the four dimensions of farmers' land values are as follows: affective value: F1, safeguard value: F2, wealth value: F3, right value: F4. 2) Farmers' land values have significant group-regional differences. Under the condition of different individual characteristics and agricultural land management characteristics, the farmers' land values are different in groups, and the regional differentiation characteristics are formed in the regional space. (3) in the large scale spatial regions, the farmers' land values show spatial heterogeneity. There are obvious differences between the overall pattern and the internal relationship among the dimensions. The spatial agglomeration of farmers' land values is not obvious, the effect of regional radiation driving is not strong, and the spatial difference is significant. 4) Farmers' land use behavior is influenced by heuristic cognitive deviation, which accords with the general law of behavioral economics. Reference point selection, income loss judgment will affect the development and change of farmers' behavior patterns. 5) Farmers' land values have a significant impact on farmers' land use behavior. There are differences in farmers' land use behaviors under different dimensions of farmers' land values, and farmers' land use behaviors have behavioral economics characteristics.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：甘肅農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F323.6;F321.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉成武;黃利民;;農(nóng)地邊際化過程中農(nóng)戶土地利用行為變化及其對糧食生產(chǎn)的影響[J];地理研究;2015年12期

2 張俊峰;張安錄;;土地資源空間異質(zhì)性與經(jīng)濟發(fā)展水平的關(guān)系研究——以武漢城市圈為例[J];自然資源學(xué)報;2015年05期

3 智靜;喬琦;傅澤強;;干旱地區(qū)工業(yè)系統(tǒng)資源代謝水平分析——以寧東能源煤化工基地為例[J];干旱區(qū)地理;2015年01期

4 李路路;鐘智鋒;;“分化的后權(quán)威主義”——轉(zhuǎn)型期中國社會的政治價值觀及其變遷分析[J];開放時代;2015年01期

5 韓長賦;;穩(wěn)糧增收調(diào)結(jié)構(gòu) 提質(zhì)增效轉(zhuǎn)方式 努力推動農(nóng)業(yè)農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟發(fā)展再上新臺階——在全國農(nóng)業(yè)工作會議上的講話(2014年12月22日)[J];農(nóng)村工作通訊;2015年01期

6 劉洪彬;呂杰;;大城市郊區(qū)不同區(qū)域農(nóng)戶土地投入行為差異及其影響因素對比研究——以沈陽市蘇家屯區(qū)為例[J];資源科學(xué);2014年10期

7 梅志雄;徐頌軍;歐陽軍;;珠三角縣域城市潛力的空間集聚演化及影響因素[J];地理研究;2014年02期

8 杜鑫;;勞動力轉(zhuǎn)移、土地租賃與農(nóng)業(yè)資本投入的聯(lián)合決策分析[J];中國農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟;2013年10期

9 陳英;謝保鵬;張仁陟;;農(nóng)民土地價值觀代際差異研究——基于甘肅天水地區(qū)調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)的實證分析[J];干旱區(qū)資源與環(huán)境;2013年10期

10 劉金海;;“社會化小農(nóng)”:含義、特征及發(fā)展趨勢[J];學(xué)術(shù)月刊;2013年08期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 田國英;行為經(jīng)濟學(xué)視角下農(nóng)戶借貸行為研究[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2013年

2 孫多勇;突發(fā)性社會公共危機事件下個體與群體行為決策研究[D];國防科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 方舟;社會主義核心價值觀的哲學(xué)思考[D];山東師范大學(xué);2014年

2 傅穎秀;農(nóng)民土地價值觀：描述、測度及實證研究[D];甘肅農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

3 裴婷婷;農(nóng)民土地價值觀對農(nóng)地利用的影響研究[D];甘肅農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

4 李曉婧;行為經(jīng)濟學(xué)視角下的中國消費者消費行為研究[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2012年

5 林鳳英;新農(nóng)村建設(shè)背景下農(nóng)民價值觀問題研究[D];福建農(nóng)林大學(xué);2011年

6 強妮;后農(nóng)業(yè)稅時代河西走廊農(nóng)地經(jīng)營方式研究[D];甘肅農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

7 張雪;農(nóng)民土地價值觀念變遷研究[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

8 許一波;轉(zhuǎn)型與嬗變[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2006年

9 朱琳;北京山區(qū)農(nóng)民土地價值觀念變化及其對土地利用的影響[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2005年

10 李亮;影響有限理性實現(xiàn)程度的因素分析[D];南京理工大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：1904775