本文選題：審計失敗　切入點：專業(yè)勝任能力　出處：《東華大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：審計作為外部公司治理機制之一,能夠提高財務(wù)報告信息的真實性和公允性。審計質(zhì)量是審計工作的靈魂,對于客戶而言,高質(zhì)量的審計服務(wù)能夠滿足客戶要求并使客戶滿意,同時在保證財務(wù)報告披露質(zhì)量和維護健康有序的市場經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展上具有非常重要的作用。對于事務(wù)所本身而言,高質(zhì)量的審計服務(wù)可以提高其獨立性并可以借此提高聲譽,從而拓展相關(guān)業(yè)務(wù)并提高經(jīng)濟效益。自注冊會計師行業(yè)恢復(fù)重建以來,我國獨立審計行業(yè)發(fā)展迅速,在市場經(jīng)濟中扮演重要角色。然而,遺憾的是,資本市場中財務(wù)舞弊事件頻發(fā),審計失敗時有發(fā)生,據(jù)統(tǒng)計,2011年至目前,證監(jiān)會對發(fā)生審計失敗的會計師事務(wù)所和注冊會計師開出行政罰單共36例,明確涉及到27家會計師事務(wù)所和68名注冊會計師,審計失敗事件頻發(fā)。這讓我們不得不深思以下問題:作為經(jīng)濟警察的會計師事務(wù)所和注冊會計師為什么沒有發(fā)揮該有的監(jiān)督作用?什么原因?qū)е聦徲嬍?審計失敗給會計師事務(wù)所和注冊會計師帶來經(jīng)濟后果了嗎?本文基于利安達2009-2015年間四次審計失敗案例分析,通過文獻研究和案例研究以及歸納分析相結(jié)合的方法,在參考國內(nèi)外學(xué)者研究結(jié)果的基礎(chǔ)上,通過收集2009-2015年證監(jiān)會對利安達會計師事務(wù)所的處罰公告,從專業(yè)勝任能力和獨立性兩個角度來分析審計失敗的原因,同時結(jié)合我國政府審計監(jiān)管的現(xiàn)有模式,從審計客戶數(shù)量、審計收費、審計質(zhì)量等多個角度來分析審計失敗對利安達會計師事務(wù)所的影響以及審計失敗給其帶來的后果。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),利安達會計師事務(wù)所審計失敗除了上市公司提供虛假財務(wù)信息、內(nèi)部控制機制不完善、關(guān)于審計方面的相關(guān)法律法規(guī)不健全等原因外,主要是其審計質(zhì)量低下造成的,而審計質(zhì)量低下又是由于會計師事務(wù)所和注冊會計師缺乏獨立性,即其和審計客戶之間產(chǎn)生了經(jīng)濟依賴性。另外我們從審計失敗對利安達會計師事務(wù)所影響的分析可知審計失敗后證監(jiān)會對其處罰是有一定效果的,但效果不明顯,即沒有明顯提高利安達會計師事務(wù)所的審計質(zhì)量。以上研究可以為會計師事務(wù)所和注冊會計師提供相關(guān)的經(jīng)驗和教訓(xùn)以及對注冊會計師在以后的審計工作中提高審計質(zhì)量具有實踐指導(dǎo)意義。同時也為證監(jiān)會提高監(jiān)管能力并完善監(jiān)管方式提供了一定的借鑒經(jīng)驗。
[Abstract]:As one of the external corporate governance mechanisms, audit can improve the authenticity and fairness of financial report information.Audit quality is the soul of audit work, for customers, high-quality audit services can meet customer requirements and make customers satisfied.At the same time, it plays a very important role in ensuring the quality of financial report disclosure and maintaining the development of healthy and orderly market economy.For the firm itself, high quality audit services can enhance its independence and reputation, thereby expanding related business and increasing economic efficiency.Since the recovery and reconstruction of CPA industry, independent audit industry in China has developed rapidly and played an important role in the market economy.Unfortunately, however, financial fraud occurs frequently in the capital market, and audit failures occur from time to time. According to statistics, from 2011 to now, the CSRC has issued 36 administrative fines to accounting firms and certified accountants who failed in their audits.Specifically involving 27 accounting firms and 68 certified public accountants, audit failures occur frequently.This leads us to ponder over the following questions: why are accounting firms and certified public accountants as economic police not playing their supervisory role?What causes the audit to fail?Did the audit failure bring economic consequences to the accounting firms and certified public accountants?Based on the analysis of four audit failure cases between 2009 and 2015, this paper combines literature research, case study and inductive analysis, on the basis of referring to the research results of scholars at home and abroad.Through collecting the punishment announcement of Lega accounting firm from 2009 to 2015, this paper analyzes the causes of audit failure from the angle of professional competence and independence. At the same time, combined with the existing mode of audit supervision in our country, the number of audit clients is analyzed.This paper analyzes the impact of audit failure on Lida accounting firm and the consequences of audit failure from many angles such as audit fees and audit quality.It is found that the audit failure of Lida accounting firm is due to the false financial information provided by listed companies, the imperfect internal control mechanism, the imperfect laws and regulations related to audit, and so on.It is mainly caused by the low audit quality, which is caused by the lack of independence between the accounting firm and the certified public accountant, that is, the economic dependence between them and the audit clients.In addition, from the analysis of the impact of audit failure on Lida accounting firm, we can see that the CSRC has certain effect on the punishment after audit failure, but the effect is not obvious, that is, the audit quality of Lida accounting firm has not been improved obviously.The above research can provide relevant experiences and lessons for accounting firms and certified public accountants, as well as practical guidance for CPA to improve the audit quality in the future audit work.At the same time, it also provides some experience for CSRC to improve its supervisory ability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F239.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉笑霞;李明輝;;行政處罰能提高審計質(zhì)量嗎?——基于中國證監(jiān)會2008-2010年行政處罰案的經(jīng)驗研究[J];證券市場導(dǎo)報;2013年06期

2 陳曦;;審計失敗的原因及其防范措施分析[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2012年11期

3 王兵;李晶;蘇文兵;唐逸凡;;行政處罰能改進審計質(zhì)量嗎?——基于中國證監(jiān)會處罰的證據(jù)[J];會計研究;2011年12期

4 張宏偉;;注冊會計師行政處罰對審計質(zhì)量的影響[J];財會通訊;2011年25期

5 方軍雄;;注冊會計師聲譽損害的代價[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟與管理;2009年08期

6 朱春艷;伍利娜;;上市公司違規(guī)問題的審計后果研究——基于證券監(jiān)管部門處罰公告的分析[J];審計研究;2009年04期

7 劉峰;謝斌;黃宇明;;規(guī)模與審計質(zhì)量:店大欺客與客大欺店?——基于香港市場大陸上市公司的經(jīng)驗數(shù)據(jù)[J];審計研究;2009年03期

8 曹細鐘;;證監(jiān)會經(jīng)濟處罰提高審計質(zhì)量了嗎?[J];山西財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年S1期

9 王建新;;上市公司審計失敗的形成機制、識別及治理[J];當代財經(jīng);2008年11期

10 劉桂良;牟謙;;審計市場結(jié)構(gòu)與審計質(zhì)量:來自中國證券市場的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];會計研究;2008年06期

相關(guān)會議論文 前2條

1 劉笑霞;李明輝;;審計師懲戒與審計定價——基于中國證監(jiān)會2008-2010年行政處罰案的研究[A];中國會計學(xué)會2012年學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集[C];2012年

2 鄭杲娉;徐永新;;資本市場監(jiān)管效果初探:來自中國證監(jiān)會審計處罰的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[A];中國會計學(xué)會2011學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集[C];2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王敏;會計師事務(wù)所行業(yè)專長與審計質(zhì)量相關(guān)度研究[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué);2007年

2 劉艷利;審計失敗的原因分析及防范[D];東北財經(jīng)大學(xué);2006年

3 何浩;我國證券市場監(jiān)管的有效性研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：1708519