【摘要】：鋼筋混凝土框架結(jié)構(gòu)因其空間布置靈活,自重輕,整體性好,便于工業(yè)化施工等優(yōu)點(diǎn),在我國廣泛應(yīng)用于學(xué)校、醫(yī)院、住宅、辦公樓等人員密集建筑。目前我國結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)中,規(guī)范要求將框架結(jié)構(gòu)填充墻視為非結(jié)構(gòu)構(gòu)件,建議采用輕質(zhì)材料,在結(jié)構(gòu)整體受力分析時(shí),不考慮填充墻對其周邊框架的影響,僅在計(jì)算框架結(jié)構(gòu)自振周期時(shí)乘以0.6~0.7的折減系數(shù)[4]。近些年我國西南地區(qū)幾次較大地震中,框架結(jié)構(gòu)因沒有合理考慮填充墻而造成結(jié)構(gòu)破壞的案例非常多,由此也造成了較大的人員傷亡和經(jīng)濟(jì)損失。因此,框架結(jié)構(gòu)填充墻對結(jié)構(gòu)主體作用的考慮,在規(guī)范現(xiàn)有要求的基礎(chǔ)上有待進(jìn)一步完善。另外,研究表明斷層附近是地震作用下破壞最為嚴(yán)重區(qū)域,受斷層破裂方向性效應(yīng)影響,在破裂傳播前方地震動(dòng)速度和位移時(shí)程呈現(xiàn)出高強(qiáng)度脈沖,其為引起近斷層結(jié)構(gòu)破壞的一個(gè)主要原因[28]。目前大部分學(xué)者關(guān)于速度脈沖地震動(dòng)的研究主要集中于分析脈沖周期和峰值與震源參數(shù)間的關(guān)系以及其對不同類型結(jié)構(gòu)的破壞機(jī)理[12][13],然而近斷層區(qū)域結(jié)構(gòu)抗震分析時(shí)速度脈沖地震動(dòng)強(qiáng)度指標(biāo)的選取有待進(jìn)一步研究。目前我國抗震分析和結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)中采用的地震動(dòng)強(qiáng)度指標(biāo)主要為地面峰值加速度PGA[10],但近年來幾次大震中結(jié)構(gòu)震害表明近斷層區(qū)域速度脈沖地震動(dòng)作用下PGA作為地震動(dòng)強(qiáng)度指標(biāo)不太完善。本文主要以蘆山中學(xué)框架結(jié)構(gòu)教學(xué)樓為分析對象,結(jié)合該教學(xué)樓在2013年4月20日蘆山地震中實(shí)際震害特點(diǎn),運(yùn)用大型非線性有限元軟件ABAQUS對其進(jìn)行數(shù)值模擬,主要探討采用不同密度和剛度填充墻材料的框架結(jié)構(gòu)教學(xué)樓在不同強(qiáng)度地震動(dòng)作用下,填充墻和框架結(jié)構(gòu)主體的震害表現(xiàn)。分析表明,七度抗震設(shè)防框架結(jié)構(gòu)教學(xué)樓,低烈度地震作用下,填充墻材料為多孔磚的框架結(jié)構(gòu)各樓層位移相比填充墻材料為燒結(jié)普通磚的框架結(jié)構(gòu)各樓層位移較大;高烈度地震作用下,填充墻材料為燒結(jié)普通磚的框架結(jié)構(gòu)各樓層位移相比填充墻材料為多孔磚的框架結(jié)構(gòu)各樓層位移較大。分析目的主要是指出目前我國結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)中框架結(jié)構(gòu)填充墻材料的選擇不太完善,當(dāng)框架結(jié)構(gòu)可能遭受地震作用較小時(shí)(0.2g及以下),建議采用密度和剛度較大的填充墻材料;當(dāng)框架結(jié)構(gòu)可能遭受地震作用較大時(shí)(0.2g以上),建議采用密度和剛度較小的填充墻材料。本文以蘆山中學(xué)框架結(jié)構(gòu)教學(xué)樓為分析對象,對其進(jìn)行多組速度脈沖地震動(dòng)作用下彈性、塑性階段時(shí)程分析,主要探討多組不同強(qiáng)度速度脈沖地震動(dòng)作用下框架結(jié)構(gòu)最大地震響應(yīng)與地震動(dòng)強(qiáng)度指標(biāo)間的線性相關(guān)性。分析表明,速度脈沖作用下,當(dāng)框架結(jié)構(gòu)受力處于彈性階段時(shí),地震動(dòng)強(qiáng)度指標(biāo)PGV和PGA與結(jié)構(gòu)最大地震響應(yīng)相關(guān)性較好;當(dāng)框架結(jié)構(gòu)受力處于塑性階段時(shí),地震動(dòng)強(qiáng)度指標(biāo)PGV和PGD與結(jié)構(gòu)最大地震響應(yīng)相關(guān)性較好。綜合考慮時(shí),近斷層區(qū)域速度脈沖地震動(dòng)強(qiáng)度指標(biāo)PGV與框架結(jié)構(gòu)最大地震響應(yīng)線性相關(guān)性較好。分析目的主要是從有限元分析的角度表明目前我國近斷層區(qū)域抗震分析和結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)中選用PGA作為地震動(dòng)強(qiáng)度指標(biāo)不是很完善,建議選取地面峰值速度PGV作為地震動(dòng)強(qiáng)度指標(biāo)。
[Abstract]:Reinforced concrete frame structure is widely used in schools, hospitals, residential buildings, office buildings and other crowded buildings in China because of its flexible spatial arrangement, light weight, good integrity and easy industrialization construction. In the analysis of the whole structure, the influence of infilled wall on the surrounding frame is ignored, and the reduction factor of 0.6-0.7 is only calculated when the natural vibration period of the frame structure is multiplied [4]. In addition, the study shows that the area near the fault is the most severely damaged area under earthquake action, and affected by the directional effect of fault rupture, the velocity and position of ground motion in front of the rupture propagation are affected by the directional effect of fault rupture. At present, most scholars'researches on velocity pulse ground motion mainly focus on analyzing the relationship between pulse period and peak value and source parameters, as well as the failure mechanism of different types of structures [12] [13]. However, near-fault regional junction The selection of velocity pulse ground motion intensity index in structural seismic analysis needs further study. At present, the ground peak acceleration PGA [10] is the main seismic intensity index used in seismic analysis and structural design in China, but in recent years, the damage of structures in several major earthquakes indicates that PGA acts as earthquake under the action of velocity pulse ground motion in near-fault region. The dynamic strength index is not perfect. In this paper, taking the teaching building of Lushan Middle School as the analysis object, combining with the actual damage characteristics of the teaching building in the Lushan earthquake on April 20, 2013, the large-scale nonlinear finite element software ABAQUS is used to simulate the dynamic strength of the building, mainly discussing the frame structure with different density and stiffness filling wall materials. The analysis shows that the displacement of each floor of the frame structure with porous brick as filling wall is larger than that of the frame structure with sintered common brick as filling wall under low intensity earthquake. The main purpose of the analysis is to point out that the selection of filling wall materials for frame structures in China is not perfect at present, and the frame structures may be subjected to earthquakes. When the density and stiffness of the frame structure are small (0.2g or less), it is suggested to adopt filling wall materials with large density and stiffness; when the frame structure is likely to be subjected to large earthquake action (above 0.2g), it is suggested to adopt filling wall materials with small density and stiffness. The time history analysis of elastic and plastic stages mainly discusses the linear correlation between the maximum seismic response and the seismic intensity index of frame structures under pulsed ground motions of different intensity velocities. The correlation between PGV and PGD and the maximum seismic response is good when the frame structure is in plastic stage. The angle shows that PGA is not a perfect seismic strength index in seismic analysis and structural design of near-fault areas in China. It is suggested to select PGV as seismic strength index.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國地震局工程力學(xué)研究所
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：TU352.11;TU375.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 劉啟方;袁一凡;金星;丁海平;;近斷層地震動(dòng)的基本特征[J];地震工程與工程振動(dòng);2006年01期

2 胡聿賢,周錫元;地震工程的跨世紀(jì)發(fā)展趨勢[J];工程抗震;1999年01期

，

本文編號：2247524