天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

建設(shè)工程招標評標方法應(yīng)用研究

發(fā)布時間:2018-08-26 18:23
【摘要】:目前,建設(shè)工程領(lǐng)域里,建設(shè)單位以招標來確定施工單位已經(jīng)成為我國最為普遍的商品交易方式,是實現(xiàn)社會資源優(yōu)化配置的有效形式。在中國,2000年頒布的《中華人民共和國招標投標法》是國內(nèi)最重要的關(guān)于招投標的法律文件。建設(shè)工程從建設(shè)初期到建設(shè)完成以及其他相關(guān)業(yè)務(wù)的招投標工作都可以依據(jù)《招標投標法》進行。評標工作是否科學合理,將直接影響到建設(shè)工作的成功與失敗,科學合理的評價體系不僅能保證項目的質(zhì)量,還能反映招投標的公開、公平、公正性。但是,目前在招標過程中,普遍存在著一些問題,使招標的結(jié)果不能很好地滿足建設(shè)單位的要求。因此,制定一套更加完善的招標程序和評標方法是招標工作成功的關(guān)鍵。建設(shè)工程招標評標是一個包含多個目標的綜合性決策問題,所以對建設(shè)工程招投標評標的方法要進行綜合評價。綜合評價一般包括兩個方面:一是評價指標(因素)的選取,二是各指標權(quán)重的確定,為此本文進行了以下工作:(1)介紹了招投標的基本知識和建設(shè)工程中幾種常見的評標方法,總結(jié)了影響建設(shè)工程招投標評標的因素并提出了建設(shè)工程招標評標方法中存在的問題。(2)根據(jù)建設(shè)工程招投標工作的特點,從投標單位的資格、投標的商務(wù)、技術(shù)、政策因素4個方面構(gòu)建了建設(shè)工程的評標指標體系。通過某高校A實驗樓招投標這一個實例,運用定性與定量相結(jié)合的層次分析法確定了技術(shù)標各評價指標的權(quán)重,通過對現(xiàn)有評價方法的對比分析,選擇模糊綜合評價法對某高校A實驗樓招投標評標方法進行評價。這樣使得評標工作更加完善,評標水平有所提高,同時提出了一些建設(shè)工程招投標中評標方法的建議與對策,為今后建設(shè)工程的招標工作提供一定的借鑒。
[Abstract]:At present, in the field of construction engineering, the construction unit to determine the construction unit by bidding has become the most common commodity trading mode in China, and is an effective form to realize the optimal allocation of social resources. In China, the Law of the people's Republic of China on bidding and bidding, promulgated in 2000, is the most important legal document on bidding in China. The bidding work of construction project from the beginning of construction to the completion of construction and other related business can be carried out according to the bidding Law. Whether the bid evaluation work is scientific or reasonable will directly affect the success and failure of the construction work. A scientific and reasonable evaluation system can not only guarantee the quality of the project, but also reflect the openness, fairness and fairness of bidding. However, at present, there are some problems in the bidding process, which makes the result of bidding can not meet the requirements of the construction unit. Therefore, a set of more perfect bidding procedures and evaluation method is the key to the success of bidding. The bidding and evaluation of construction project is a comprehensive decision problem with multiple objectives, so the method of bidding evaluation for construction project should be evaluated synthetically. Comprehensive evaluation generally includes two aspects: first, the selection of evaluation index (factors), and second, the determination of the weight of each index. For this reason, this paper has carried on the following work: (1) introduced the basic knowledge of bidding and several common bidding evaluation methods in construction engineering, This paper summarizes the factors affecting the bidding and evaluation of construction projects and puts forward the problems existing in the methods of bidding and evaluation of construction projects. (2) according to the characteristics of the bidding work of construction projects, from the qualifications of the bidding units, the commercial and technical aspects of the bidding, The evaluation index system of construction project is constructed in four aspects of policy factors. Through the example of bidding in A experimental building of a certain university, the weight of each evaluation index of technical standard is determined by using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), which combines qualitative and quantitative analysis, and the comparison and analysis of the existing evaluation methods are carried out. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is selected to evaluate the bidding evaluation method of A experimental building in a university. In this way, the bidding evaluation work is more perfect and the level of bid evaluation is improved. At the same time, some suggestions and countermeasures of bid evaluation methods in bidding for construction projects are put forward, which will provide some reference for the bidding work of construction projects in the future.
【學位授予單位】:西安工業(yè)大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:TU723.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 樓金雨;;我國招投標制度中存在的問題與完善[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2009年19期

2 陸軍;;論評標專家的規(guī)制與管理[J];機電信息;2008年02期

3 譚偉;張星;;完善我國建設(shè)工程招標投標制度的探討[J];江蘇建筑;2008年03期

4 朱鴻昌;;工程招投標中的不正當競爭行為分析[J];山西建筑;2009年27期

5 張麗芹;;建設(shè)工程招標方式和評標方法研究[J];山西建筑;2010年22期

6 宋雪荃 ,袁銘;模糊評價在工程招標評標和定標中的應(yīng)用[J];新疆石油教育學院學報;2003年02期

7 崔曉迪;王耀球;;第三方物流項目的評標研究[J];中國物流與采購;2011年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 水利部水利水電建設(shè)與管理總站顧問 唐廣慶;[N];中國水利報;2005年



本文編號:2205769

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/jianzhujingjilunwen/2205769.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶4534d***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要刪除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com