本文選題：城鎮(zhèn)化 + 空間管制�。� 參考：《清華大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：空間治理,作為對(duì)國(guó)家新型城鎮(zhèn)化過程中,在政府、市場(chǎng)、社會(huì)以及空間四者關(guān)系方面認(rèn)識(shí)的重要轉(zhuǎn)型,正在進(jìn)入規(guī)劃師的視野。我國(guó)以往的城鎮(zhèn)化,是在意識(shí)形態(tài)指導(dǎo)下的一場(chǎng)涉及到全地域的、大規(guī)模有組織的城市空間增長(zhǎng)過程,空間管制體系則是這個(gè)過程中的核心工具,即現(xiàn)有的帶有強(qiáng)制性的城鄉(xiāng)規(guī)劃體系。借助空間管制體系,政府對(duì)市場(chǎng)、社會(huì)以及生態(tài)均有不同程度的指揮和引導(dǎo)作用,國(guó)家也牢牢控制了城鎮(zhèn)化過程中的幾大核心——人、地、權(quán)、利。經(jīng)過長(zhǎng)時(shí)間的證明,這套做法實(shí)際上已經(jīng)取得了經(jīng)濟(jì)的高速增長(zhǎng),而且從目前的城鎮(zhèn)化率來看,在可以預(yù)見的未來,未來中國(guó)的城市規(guī)模也將會(huì)繼續(xù)保持一定速度的增長(zhǎng)。但是,城市空間增長(zhǎng)的同時(shí),政府單方面在空間管制體系各個(gè)層面都帶有強(qiáng)制性的管制理念也降低了非政府的其他三者自身存在的一些優(yōu)勢(shì),進(jìn)而影響到了城鎮(zhèn)化的質(zhì)量,由此也產(chǎn)生了諸如城市千篇一律、市場(chǎng)效率低、社會(huì)創(chuàng)新能力低、城市生態(tài)環(huán)境惡化等一系列的后果。簡(jiǎn)言之,當(dāng)前城鎮(zhèn)化的過程應(yīng)該是政府、市場(chǎng)、社會(huì)和生態(tài)共同協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的過程,其中任何一項(xiàng)單獨(dú)發(fā)揮自己的指引作用都有可能適得其反。隨著《物權(quán)法》等一系列與社會(huì)個(gè)體權(quán)利相關(guān)法律的出臺(tái),現(xiàn)實(shí)中政府主導(dǎo)下的城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施資金缺口、以及“鄰避”等現(xiàn)實(shí)問題的困擾,部分政府已經(jīng)做出了更為細(xì)致的政策引導(dǎo)和讓步,譬如“PPP合作模式”、“自征自用”等,但是其中一些做法的合理性和合法性還有待商討�？臻g治理的提出實(shí)際上是對(duì)當(dāng)前城鎮(zhèn)化過程中四者職能、相互關(guān)系的進(jìn)一步優(yōu)化,其中包括劃清四者在城鎮(zhèn)化進(jìn)程中的角色和權(quán)力或者權(quán)利邊界,而在具體的城鎮(zhèn)化進(jìn)行過程中遇到具體問題時(shí),應(yīng)該采用更為靈活的方式應(yīng)對(duì)不同地區(qū)存在的現(xiàn)實(shí)問題,譬如多元協(xié)商的模式使得面對(duì)發(fā)展問題的時(shí)候更加具有針對(duì)性,或者引入市場(chǎng)或者社會(huì)組織到具體的城鎮(zhèn)化過程中,通過不斷的厘清四者之間的關(guān)系,在逐步形成空間治理體系的過程中逐步增加空間治理的能力。
[Abstract]:Spatial governance, as an important transformation of the understanding of government, market, society and spatial relationship in the process of new urbanization of the country, is entering the vision of planners. The urbanization of our country in the past is a large-scale organized urban spatial growth process involving the whole region under the guidance of ideology, and the spatial control system is the core tool in this process. That is, the existing urban and rural planning system with mandatory. With the help of the spatial control system, the government has a different degree of command and guidance to the market, society and ecology, and the state has also firmly controlled the core of the urbanization process-man, land, power and benefit. After a long period of proof, the practice has actually achieved rapid economic growth, and from the current urbanization rate, in the foreseeable future, China's urban size will continue to maintain a certain rate of growth. However, at the same time of the growth of urban space, the government's unilateral concept of mandatory control at all levels of the spatial control system also reduces some advantages of the other three non-governmental organizations, thus affecting the quality of urbanization. As a result, such as urban stereotype, low market efficiency, low social innovation ability, urban ecological environment deterioration and a series of consequences. In short, the current process of urbanization should be the process of coordinated development of government, market, society and ecology. With the publication of a series of laws related to social individual rights, the gap of urban infrastructure funds under the guidance of the government in reality, as well as the problems of "neighborhood avoidance" and so on, have been troubled by the publication of a series of laws related to the rights of individuals in the society. Some governments have made more detailed policy guidance and concessions, such as "PPP cooperation mode", "self-use" and so on, but the rationality and legitimacy of some of them have yet to be discussed. The proposal of spatial governance is in fact a further optimization of the relationship between the functions of the four in the current urbanization process, including the delineation of the role, power or power boundary of the four in the process of urbanization. However, when facing specific problems in the course of specific urbanization, we should adopt a more flexible way to deal with the practical problems existing in different regions. For example, the model of pluralistic consultation makes it more targeted in the face of development problems. Or the introduction of market or social organizations to the specific process of urbanization, through the continuous clarification of the relationship between the four, in the process of gradually forming a spatial governance system to gradually increase the ability of spatial governance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：清華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：TU984.113

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫瑤;馬航;邵亦文;;走出社區(qū)對(duì)基本生態(tài)控制線的“鄰避”困局——以深圳市基本生態(tài)控制線實(shí)施為例[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2014年11期

2 胡鞍鋼;;中國(guó)國(guó)家治理現(xiàn)代化的特征與方向[J];國(guó)家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年03期

3 丁翠翠;;城市增長(zhǎng)管理研究綜述[J];河南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年03期

4 郝偉亞;王盈盈;丁慧平;;城市軌道交通PPP模式核心要點(diǎn)研究——北京地鐵M號(hào)線案例分析[J];土木工程學(xué)報(bào);2012年10期

5 李曉莉;李郁芳;;西方學(xué)者公共治理理論研究綜述[J];江蘇商論;2011年10期

6 鄧鋒;;城鄉(xiāng)土地利用中的外部性與土地發(fā)展權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)移[J];城市問題;2010年12期

7 徐祖瀾;;鄉(xiāng)紳之治與國(guó)家權(quán)力——以明清時(shí)期中國(guó)鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)為背景[J];法學(xué)家;2010年06期

8 易承志;;美國(guó)大都市區(qū)政府治理實(shí)踐及其啟示[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2010年05期

9 彭飛飛;;美國(guó)的城市區(qū)劃法[J];國(guó)際城市規(guī)劃;2009年S1期

10 金吾倫;;吳良鏞人居環(huán)境科學(xué)理論和實(shí)踐[J];工程研究-跨科學(xué)視野中的工程;2009年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1894899