本文選題：建筑項(xiàng)目 + 施工變更�。� 參考：《長(zhǎng)沙理工大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的繁榮和技術(shù)的進(jìn)步,大型建筑工程項(xiàng)目的數(shù)量不斷增多。由于這些項(xiàng)目投資巨大、功能多樣、組成復(fù)雜、建設(shè)周期長(zhǎng),在施工過(guò)程中工程變更不可避免會(huì)發(fā)生,這些變更都會(huì)對(duì)項(xiàng)目的投資、進(jìn)度、質(zhì)量等方面產(chǎn)生不可忽視的影響。由于變更時(shí)間緊、缺乏規(guī)范的變更方案評(píng)價(jià)依據(jù)等原因,較少有業(yè)主方在施工階段對(duì)變更進(jìn)行多方案比選,也缺乏對(duì)變更方案進(jìn)行質(zhì)量、進(jìn)度、費(fèi)用等全方位的綜合評(píng)價(jià)。缺乏對(duì)變更方案比選或評(píng)價(jià)極有可能既浪費(fèi)了投資,又造成了工期損失。因此,對(duì)于業(yè)主方來(lái)說(shuō),強(qiáng)化施工階段工程變更的多方案比選是目前迫切需要解決的問(wèn)題。本文基于業(yè)主方角度對(duì)建筑工程項(xiàng)目在施工階段的工程變更方案比選進(jìn)行了研究。首先,對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)和資料進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)的研究,找到了以往工程變更方案比選研究的不足,主要是對(duì)工程變更方案比選重視不足,變更方案比選指標(biāo)體系不夠合理和完善。本文對(duì)已完工程的變更數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行了統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,得到了需要重點(diǎn)研究的變更形式—設(shè)計(jì)方案變更和施工措施方案變更。本文在現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)研究的基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)現(xiàn)有的影響工程變更多方案比選的因素指標(biāo)進(jìn)行了總結(jié)和歸納,根據(jù)指標(biāo)體系的建立原則找出了現(xiàn)有的影響因素指標(biāo)體系的不足并進(jìn)行了改進(jìn),建立了初步的影響因素指標(biāo)體系;然后運(yùn)用主成分分析法篩選出相互無(wú)關(guān)聯(lián)的主要影響因素,對(duì)工程變更方案比選指標(biāo)體系進(jìn)行了優(yōu)化;再次,構(gòu)建了基于改進(jìn)的價(jià)值工程的變更方案比選模型,通過(guò)層次分析法來(lái)確定功能指標(biāo)的權(quán)重,采用熵權(quán)技術(shù)來(lái)計(jì)算功能系數(shù),通過(guò)計(jì)算價(jià)值系數(shù)的大小來(lái)選擇最優(yōu)方案,最后,本文結(jié)合案例進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析,對(duì)變更方案比選模型的科學(xué)性和合理性進(jìn)行了驗(yàn)證。
[Abstract]:With the economic prosperity and technological progress, the number of large construction projects is increasing. Because these projects have huge investment, diverse functions, complex composition and long construction cycle, engineering changes will inevitably occur in the construction process, and these changes will have a significant impact on the investment, schedule and quality of the projects. Because of the tight time of the change and the lack of standard evaluation basis of the change scheme, there are few owners to compare and select the change in the construction stage, and also lack of comprehensive evaluation of the quality, schedule and cost of the change scheme. The lack of comparison or evaluation of change schemes may not only waste investment, but also cause time loss. Therefore, for the owner, it is urgent to solve the problem of strengthening the multi-scheme selection of engineering change in construction stage. Based on the owner-side view, this paper studies the comparison and selection of the project change scheme in the construction stage. First of all, the domestic and foreign related literature and materials are systematically studied, and the shortcomings of the previous research on the comparison and selection of engineering change schemes are found, mainly due to the lack of attention to the comparison and selection of engineering change schemes. It is not reasonable and perfect to change the scheme than to select the index system. In this paper, the change data of the completed project are statistically analyzed, and the design scheme change and the construction measure scheme change are obtained which need to be studied emphatically. On the basis of the existing literature research, this paper summarizes and induces the factors that affect the multi-scheme selection of engineering change, finds out the deficiency of the existing index system of influencing factors according to the establishment principle of the index system, and improves the index system. Established a preliminary impact factor index system, and then used principal component analysis method to screen out the main factors that are not related to each other, and optimized the index system of project change scheme comparison. Based on the improved value engineering change scheme comparison model is constructed, the weight of the function index is determined by AHP, the function coefficient is calculated by entropy weight technology, the optimal scheme is selected by calculating the value coefficient. Finally, In this paper, a case study is carried out to verify the rationality and scientificalness of the model.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長(zhǎng)沙理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：TU74

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 谷利軍;戴國(guó)清;;朝陽(yáng)西樞紐立交方案比選[J];遼寧省交通高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

2 徐飆;;二元論方法在橋梁方案比選中的應(yīng)用[J];黑龍江交通科技;2007年01期

3 陳枝洪;;南江大橋方案比選[J];黑龍江交通科技;2007年08期

4 龔美;;貴清高速公路干井立交的方案比選[J];中國(guó)科技信息;2008年01期

5 田廣予;;榆和高速公路左權(quán)樞紐方案比選[J];山西交通科技;2012年01期

6 殷開(kāi)榮;;渾南新區(qū)立交方案比選[J];北方交通;2014年01期

7 李亞平;新沙口大橋方案比選[J];華東公路;2002年02期

8 黃云涌,雷明臣,張嘉恒;依寶公路勃利至七臺(tái)河段鶴大互通方案比選[J];黑龍江交通科技;2003年05期

9 付軍明,廖向東,鄧麗娟,崔艷麗;基于模糊選優(yōu)原理的路線方案比選方法[J];中外公路;2004年02期

10 王殿文;哈東路立交橋方案比選[J];森林工程;2005年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前7條

1 崔麗紅;劉鑫;魏慶朝;;橋梁方案比選計(jì)算機(jī)模擬系統(tǒng)[A];第十屆全國(guó)結(jié)構(gòu)工程學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集第Ⅲ卷[C];2001年

2 陳q，

本文編號(hào)：1850328