本文選題：結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)　切入點(diǎn)：結(jié)構(gòu)試驗(yàn)　出處：《西安建筑科技大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：基于試驗(yàn)的設(shè)計(jì)方法是國(guó)際上提出的新的結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)方法,它將結(jié)構(gòu)試驗(yàn)引入具體的設(shè)計(jì)過(guò)程中,通過(guò)載荷試驗(yàn)和統(tǒng)計(jì)推斷直接確定設(shè)計(jì)對(duì)象的抗力設(shè)計(jì)值,具有顯著的實(shí)證性,適用于大批量相似構(gòu)件、復(fù)雜結(jié)構(gòu)和新型結(jié)構(gòu)的設(shè)計(jì),是目前結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)方法發(fā)展的重要方向之一。基于分析模型的推斷方法是基于試驗(yàn)的設(shè)計(jì)方法的重要內(nèi)容,是推斷抗力設(shè)計(jì)值的關(guān)鍵方法,它在推斷中利用了抗力分析模型中已知影響因素的概率特性,可在較大程度上減小推斷中的不確定性,得到更優(yōu)的推斷結(jié)果。但是國(guó)際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)ISO2394:1998中基于分析模型的推斷方法是一種間接的推斷方法,它采用了設(shè)計(jì)中的分析模型,未能直接反應(yīng)各影響因素概率特性的影響,故在推斷過(guò)程中不能保證抗力設(shè)計(jì)值具有一致的保證率,不利于對(duì)結(jié)構(gòu)可靠度的控制;歐洲規(guī)范EN1990:2002中的方法雖然可在統(tǒng)一的保證率下推斷抗力的設(shè)計(jì)值,但存在理論上的缺陷,是一種經(jīng)驗(yàn)性方法,其推斷結(jié)果偏于保守,甚至出現(xiàn)抗力設(shè)計(jì)值為零的情況。目前,國(guó)際上尚未很好的解決如何在統(tǒng)一的保證率下,以一種理論基礎(chǔ)嚴(yán)密的方法推斷抗力設(shè)計(jì)值的問(wèn)題。本文針對(duì)目前國(guó)際上抗力推斷方法的不足,直接依據(jù)抗力的概率模型,完全按照統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)的方法,提出了基于概率模型的抗力設(shè)計(jì)值推斷方法。該方法在統(tǒng)一的保證率下,分別針對(duì)“計(jì)算模式不定性系數(shù)的變異系數(shù)未知”和“計(jì)算模式不定性系數(shù)的變異系數(shù)已知”兩種情況提出抗力設(shè)計(jì)值的推斷公式,不但具有嚴(yán)密的理論基礎(chǔ),而且克服了之前抗力推斷方法的缺點(diǎn)。為了檢驗(yàn)該方法的適用性,本文首先通過(guò)引入一個(gè)工程實(shí)例,分別利用區(qū)間估計(jì)法和文中方法對(duì)受彎構(gòu)件承載力的設(shè)計(jì)值進(jìn)行推斷,并對(duì)其推斷結(jié)果進(jìn)行分析。然后在相同保證率下,對(duì)比了歐洲規(guī)范中方法與本文方法的推斷結(jié)果,對(duì)比結(jié)果表明,基于概率模型的抗力設(shè)計(jì)值推斷方法不僅符合統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)的一般規(guī)律,且可給出適宜的推斷結(jié)果�；诟怕誓Ｐ偷目沽ν茢喾椒òl(fā)展了基于分析模型的抗力推斷方法,是對(duì)目前結(jié)構(gòu)構(gòu)件抗力推斷方法的一個(gè)補(bǔ)充。
[Abstract]:The design method based on test is a new structural design method put forward in the world. It introduces the structural test into the concrete design process and directly determines the resistance design value of the design object through load test and statistical inference. It is one of the most important directions in the development of structural design methods to apply to the design of large quantities of similar components, complex structures and new structures. The inference method based on analytical model is an important part of the experimental design method. It is a key method to infer the design value of resistance. It makes use of the probability characteristics of known factors in the model of resistance analysis, which can reduce the uncertainty in inference to a large extent. But the inference method based on analytical model in the international standard ISO2394:1998 is an indirect inference method, which adopts the analysis model in the design, and fails to directly reflect the influence of the probability characteristics of each influence factor. Therefore, in the process of inference, the design value of resistance can not be guaranteed consistently, which is not conducive to the control of structural reliability. Although the method in European Specification EN1990:2002 can infer the design value of resistance under the unified guarantee rate, it has some theoretical defects. It is an empirical method, whose inference results are conservative, and even the resistance design value is zero. At present, the international community has not solved the problem well under the unified guarantee rate. The problem of inferring the design value of resistance by a method with a strict theoretical basis is discussed in this paper. In view of the deficiency of the present method of resistance inference in the world, the method is directly based on the probability model of resistance and is completely in accordance with the statistical method. A method of inferring resistance design value based on probabilistic model is proposed. In the case of "unknown coefficient of variation of uncertain coefficient of calculation mode" and "coefficient of variation of uncertain coefficient of calculation mode known", the inferring formulas of resistance design value are put forward respectively, which not only have a strict theoretical foundation, In order to test the applicability of the method, an engineering example is introduced to infer the design value of the bearing capacity of flexural members by using interval estimation method and the method in this paper, respectively. Then, under the same guarantee rate, the inferred results of the methods in European norms and the methods in this paper are compared, and the comparison results show that, The inference method of resistance design value based on probabilistic model not only accords with the general rule of statistics, but also gives the appropriate inferential result. The resistance inference method based on probabilistic model has developed the resistance inference method based on analytical model. It is a supplement to the current method of estimating the resistance of structural members.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安建筑科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：TU317

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李啟信,W.White,楚劍,趙敏敏;土層的概率模型及其在樁基分析中的應(yīng)用[J];巖土工程學(xué)報(bào);1989年06期

2 徐人平;葉司一;李淑蘭;;斷裂韌性的概率模型[J];云南工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1993年01期

3 王阜;地震發(fā)生的空間概率模型[J];地震工程與工程振動(dòng);1986年03期

4 任飛正,孔力;客運(yùn)量的合成預(yù)測(cè)與概率模型[J];鐵道運(yùn)輸與經(jīng)濟(jì);2003年02期

5 劉任先;路面不平的概率模型[J];農(nóng)業(yè)機(jī)械學(xué)報(bào);1990年01期

6 賀紅艷,周杰娜;基于概率模型和博弈模型的發(fā)電廠(chǎng)報(bào)價(jià)策略研究[J];貴州工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2004年01期

7 徐楠;王威強(qiáng);王勝春;李艷;;疲勞概率模型的綜合評(píng)價(jià)方法[J];中國(guó)機(jī)械工程;2008年23期

8 胡泳芬;出游法中概率模型的改進(jìn)[J];江西電力;1997年04期

9 梁磊;;船撞橋概率模型分析[J];物流工程與管理;2009年02期

10 井浩涌，，劉軍，潘文新，張玉德;群體決策的概率模型與分組德?tīng)柗品椒╗J];大連鐵道學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1995年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前8條

1 徐道遠(yuǎn);張林兵;符曉陵;壽朝暉;;混凝土裂縫失穩(wěn)擴(kuò)展的概率模型研究[A];第二屆全國(guó)結(jié)構(gòu)工程學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集（上）[C];1993年

2 王冰潔; 沈玉清;;中國(guó)上市公司被收購(gòu)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)概率模型的實(shí)證分析[A];中國(guó)災(zāi)害防御協(xié)會(huì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析專(zhuān)業(yè)委員會(huì)第二屆年會(huì)論文集（一）[C];2006年

3 季Y

本文編號(hào)：1574994