本文選題：價(jià)格認(rèn)證 + 職能定位�。� 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：價(jià)格認(rèn)證是價(jià)格工作的重要組成部分,是在特定領(lǐng)域、特定時(shí)間,對(duì)特定財(cái)產(chǎn)進(jìn)行的一次性定價(jià)行為,是司法、執(zhí)法活動(dòng)在價(jià)格領(lǐng)域的延伸。目前,全國(guó)按照國(guó)家、省、市、縣四級(jí)建立價(jià)格認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)2980個(gè),隸屬于各級(jí)政府價(jià)格主管部門,實(shí)行事業(yè)單位管理。2014年,全國(guó)價(jià)格認(rèn)證系統(tǒng)共辦理各類刑事、紀(jì)檢、行政等案件118萬(wàn)件,標(biāo)的總額4274億元,為維護(hù)社會(huì)正常的經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序、有效打擊犯罪、懲治腐敗、構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)做出了重要貢獻(xiàn)。十八大以來(lái),我國(guó)的各項(xiàng)事業(yè)都在改革的春風(fēng)中盎然推進(jìn),價(jià)格認(rèn)證工作也處于風(fēng)口之上。當(dāng)前,價(jià)格認(rèn)證工作亟需破解諸如缺失“頂層設(shè)計(jì)”,缺少操作規(guī)范,厘清工作范圍等等問(wèn)題,順應(yīng)市場(chǎng)規(guī)律辦事,真正做到市場(chǎng)的歸市場(chǎng),政府的歸政府,凡是市場(chǎng)主體和社會(huì)組織不愿做、做不好、做不了或者是不適宜做、社會(huì)強(qiáng)烈需要價(jià)格認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)的交叉業(yè)務(wù)領(lǐng)域,價(jià)格認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)應(yīng)果斷出擊,充分發(fā)揮政府系統(tǒng)公信、公平、公正的定位,為社會(huì)治理補(bǔ)位,克服市場(chǎng)失靈。徹底改變社會(huì)上一部分人對(duì)價(jià)格認(rèn)證工作的片面認(rèn)識(shí),充分發(fā)揮好價(jià)格行政裁定的職能作用,積極承擔(dān)起“元治理”的裁判角色,把主要精力投入到涉案、涉紀(jì)、涉稅財(cái)物價(jià)格認(rèn)定和對(duì)社會(huì)中介價(jià)格評(píng)估機(jī)構(gòu)的管理上來(lái)。本文嘗試從研究的角度,在宏觀政策的背景下,運(yùn)用公共服務(wù)理論等相關(guān)知識(shí),充分借鑒國(guó)內(nèi)的研究成果,批判繼承國(guó)外的工作經(jīng)驗(yàn),嘗試對(duì)價(jià)格認(rèn)證路徑進(jìn)行優(yōu)化提升,在理念上牢固樹(shù)立公共服務(wù)思維,在路徑中引入價(jià)格調(diào)查、價(jià)格認(rèn)證聽(tīng)證和檔案文書(shū)電子備案制度,在機(jī)制上進(jìn)一步豐富完善價(jià)格糾紛調(diào)解制度,在模式上嘗試價(jià)格認(rèn)證公共服務(wù)購(gòu)買方式,試從職能定位、法制建設(shè)、清單管理、模式創(chuàng)新、機(jī)制建立等方面對(duì)價(jià)格認(rèn)證進(jìn)行補(bǔ)充和完善,期望價(jià)格認(rèn)證能夠更加貼近實(shí)務(wù)工作,更加契合價(jià)格宏觀調(diào)控的需要,能夠?yàn)樗痉ê蛨?zhí)法機(jī)關(guān)提供更加有力的證據(jù)支持,能夠在社會(huì)大調(diào)解中發(fā)揮更加積極有效的作用。
[Abstract]:Price authentication is an important part of price work. It is the one-off pricing behavior of a particular property in a specific field, a specific time, and an extension of judicial and law enforcement activities in the field of price. At present, 2,980 price certification institutions have been established in the whole country according to the national, provincial, municipal and county levels, which are subordinate to the price authorities at all levels and are managed by public institutions. In 2014, the national price certification system handled all kinds of criminal and disciplinary inspections. The total amount of administrative cases is 427.4 billion yuan, which has made an important contribution to maintaining social normal economic order, effectively cracking down on crime, punishing corruption and building a harmonious society. Since the 18th National Congress, China's various undertakings in the spring wind of reform, price certification work is also in the tuyere. At present, the work of price certification urgently needs to solve such problems as missing "top-level design", lack of operational norms, clarification of the scope of work, and so on, so as to comply with the laws of the market, and truly achieve the return of the market to the market, and the government to the government. All market bodies and social organizations are unwilling to do it, can't do it well, cannot do it or are unfit to do it. The society strongly needs cross-business fields of price certification bodies. Price certification agencies should resolutely attack and give full play to the public trust and fairness of the government system. Fair positioning, for social governance, overcome market failure. Thoroughly changing the one-sided understanding of price certification among some people in society, giving full play to the function of price administrative adjudication, actively taking on the role of "meta-governance" and devoting major energy to the involvement in the period, Tax-related property price determination and social intermediary price evaluation organization management. In this paper, from the perspective of research, under the background of macro policy, using public service theory and other relevant knowledge, fully learn from domestic research results, critically inherit the work experience of foreign countries, try to optimize the path of price certification. Firmly establish the public service thinking in concept, introduce price investigation, price authentication hearing and electronic filing system in the path, further enrich and perfect the price dispute mediation system in the mechanism, In the model, we try to supply and perfect the price certification from the aspects of function orientation, legal system construction, list management, model innovation, mechanism establishment, etc. It is expected that the price certification can be more close to the practical work, more in line with the needs of price macro-control, can provide more effective evidence for the judiciary and law enforcement agencies, and can play a more active and effective role in social mediation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F726

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 陳峻;對(duì)價(jià)格鑒定、價(jià)格認(rèn)證、價(jià)格評(píng)估行為的性質(zhì)分析[J];價(jià)格理論與實(shí)踐;2005年02期

2 李盛霖;關(guān)于推進(jìn)價(jià)格信用體系建設(shè)[J];價(jià)格理論與實(shí)踐;2004年06期

3 鄒向群;發(fā)揮價(jià)格中介服務(wù)職能 推動(dòng)價(jià)格評(píng)估鑒證事業(yè)健康發(fā)展[J];價(jià)格理論與實(shí)踐;2004年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：2110803