本文選題：貿(mào)易便利化 + 層次分析法��； 參考：《首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著全球經(jīng)濟(jì)與貿(mào)易的持續(xù)發(fā)展,以關(guān)稅代表的典型的貿(mào)易障礙對(duì)國(guó)際貿(mào)易的干擾和阻礙已不斷減退。貿(mào)易便利化問(wèn)題逐步受到重視,各國(guó)希望通過(guò)提高口岸工作效率,改善海關(guān)環(huán)境和規(guī)制環(huán)境,加強(qiáng)電子商務(wù)應(yīng)用等方式來(lái)促進(jìn)各國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)。然而作為世界貿(mào)易大國(guó),我國(guó)貿(mào)易便利化發(fā)展較晚,水平相對(duì)落后。毋庸置疑,較高的貿(mào)易便利化水平可以促進(jìn)我國(guó)貿(mào)易經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展。本文主要通過(guò)六部分內(nèi)容進(jìn)行闡述。首先通過(guò)敘述選題背景及意義,引出全文有關(guān)貿(mào)易便利化的主題。第二部分回顧國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)的研究現(xiàn)狀及成果,同時(shí)進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)單述評(píng)。第三部分簡(jiǎn)單闡述其概念定義、發(fā)展歷程等方面。借鑒Wilson的研究成果,本文建立了相關(guān)的測(cè)評(píng)指標(biāo)體系。第四部分通過(guò)層次分析法,對(duì)各個(gè)指標(biāo)的權(quán)重進(jìn)行確定。本文依據(jù)測(cè)評(píng)體系建立模型,測(cè)算出2008-2014年中國(guó)貿(mào)易便利化綜合得分,以及2014年中國(guó)及選取的其他國(guó)家的綜合得分�？v向分析我國(guó)近六年的貿(mào)易便利化發(fā)展水平,同時(shí)對(duì)2014年的測(cè)算結(jié)果進(jìn)行國(guó)家間的橫向比較。結(jié)果表明,我國(guó)近些年貿(mào)易便利化水平逐步遞增,上升趨勢(shì)明顯。2014年,在所選取的20個(gè)國(guó)家中,中國(guó)位列第十三位,落后于新加坡、歐盟、美國(guó)、日本和南非等國(guó)家,領(lǐng)先于俄羅斯、巴西、印度等發(fā)展中國(guó)家。在規(guī)制環(huán)境項(xiàng)目中,我國(guó)已超過(guò)美國(guó)、澳大利亞、韓國(guó)和其余四個(gè)金磚國(guó)家。但是從整體上來(lái)判斷,中國(guó)貿(mào)易便利化水平與發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家之間仍有較大差距。第五部分,本文具體的分析了我國(guó)在口岸建設(shè)、海關(guān)工作、規(guī)章制度、電子商務(wù)領(lǐng)域的主要問(wèn)題,并提出加強(qiáng)口岸建設(shè)、簡(jiǎn)化通關(guān)流程、增強(qiáng)規(guī)制透明名度、完善制度、推行電子商務(wù)、培養(yǎng)人才、加強(qiáng)國(guó)際合作等建議。最后闡述本文結(jié)論。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of global economy and trade, the interference and hindrance to international trade caused by the typical trade barrier represented by tariff has been decreasing. The problem of trade facilitation has been paid more and more attention. Countries hope to promote the economic growth by improving the working efficiency of ports, improving the customs environment and regulatory environment, strengthening the application of electronic commerce and so on. However, as a big trading country in the world, China's trade facilitation develops relatively late and the level is relatively backward. There is no doubt that a higher level of trade facilitation can promote the development of China's trade economy. This article mainly through six parts to elaborate. First of all, by describing the background and significance of the topic, the full text of the theme of trade facilitation. The second part reviews the domestic and foreign related research status and achievements, at the same time a simple review. The third part simply explains its concept definition, development course and so on. Based on Wilson's research results, this paper establishes a related evaluation index system. In the fourth part, the weight of each index is determined by analytic hierarchy process. Based on the model of evaluation system, this paper calculates the comprehensive scores of China's trade facilitation from 2008 to 2014, as well as the comprehensive scores of China and other selected countries in 2014. The development level of China's trade facilitation in recent six years is analyzed vertically, and the calculated results in 2014 are compared horizontally among countries. The results show that the level of trade facilitation in China has gradually increased in recent years, with a marked upward trend. In 2014, China ranked 13th among the 20 countries selected, lagging behind Singapore, the European Union, the United States, Japan and South Africa. Ahead of Russia, Brazil, India and other developing countries. China has overtaken the United States, Australia, South Korea and the other four BRICS countries in regulatory environmental programs. But judging from the whole, there is still a big gap between China's trade facilitation level and developed countries. In the fifth part, this paper analyzes the main problems in the field of port construction, customs work, rules and regulations, electronic commerce, and proposes to strengthen port construction, simplify the customs clearance process, enhance the transparency of regulation, and improve the system. Promote electronic commerce, train talent, strengthen international cooperation and other suggestions. Finally, the conclusion of this paper is expounded.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F752

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 孫林;徐旭霏;;東盟貿(mào)易便利化對(duì)中國(guó)制造業(yè)產(chǎn)品出口影響的實(shí)證分析[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2011年08期

2 單君蘭;周蘋;;基于APEC的貿(mào)易便利化測(cè)評(píng)及對(duì)我國(guó)出口影響的實(shí)證分析[J];國(guó)際商務(wù)研究;2012年01期

3 劉巖;盧偉家;劉寶;;進(jìn)口貿(mào)易便利化對(duì)中國(guó)進(jìn)口影響的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];遼東學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年04期

4 段景輝;黃丙志;;貿(mào)易便利化水平指標(biāo)體系研究[J];科學(xué)發(fā)展;2011年07期

5 張魯青;;我國(guó)如何應(yīng)對(duì)貿(mào)易便利化[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年03期

6 沈銘輝;;金磚國(guó)家合作機(jī)制探索——基于貿(mào)易便利化的合作前景[J];太平洋學(xué)報(bào);2011年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：2013754