本文選題：債權(quán)債務(wù)關(guān)系鎖鏈 + 次貸危機(jī)��； 參考：《馬克思主義研究》2012年09期

【摘要】：不同債務(wù)規(guī)模造成經(jīng)濟(jì)影響不同,有些會(huì)引致債務(wù)危機(jī),而另一些不會(huì)。債權(quán)債務(wù)關(guān)系鎖鏈?zhǔn)莻鶆?wù)問(wèn)題上升為債務(wù)危機(jī)的重要因素,這也是馬克思主義政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的重要內(nèi)容。通過(guò)美國(guó)次貸危機(jī)與中國(guó)地方債的分析,本文認(rèn)為:在次貸危機(jī)中,債權(quán)債務(wù)的關(guān)系鎖鏈從家庭部門—放貸機(jī)構(gòu)間傳遞到金融機(jī)構(gòu)之間,最后引發(fā)國(guó)家層面?zhèn)鶛?quán)債務(wù)關(guān)系的變化;目前中國(guó)地方債雖然沒(méi)有償付性風(fēng)險(xiǎn),但是存在過(guò)度依賴銀行的高杠桿化與債務(wù)預(yù)算約束問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:Different levels of debt have different economic implications, some leading to debt crises and others not. The relationship between creditor's rights and debts is an important factor in the rise of debt problem to debt crisis, which is also an important part of Marxist political economy. Based on the analysis of the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States and the local debt in China, this paper holds that in the subprime mortgage crisis, the relationship between debt and debt is transferred from the household sector to the lending institution to the financial institution. Finally, there is a change in the relationship between debt and debt at the national level. Although there is no solvency risk in China's local debt at present, there are problems of excessive reliance on banks' high leverage and debt budget constraints.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金“增強(qiáng)自主創(chuàng)新能力提升經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)質(zhì)量研究”(71073076) 國(guó)家社科基金重大招標(biāo)項(xiàng)目“貫徹落實(shí)科學(xué)發(fā)展觀與加快轉(zhuǎn)變經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展方式研究”(07&ZD009)的資助
【分類號(hào)】：F837.12;F812.5
，

本文編號(hào)：1910640