【摘要】：在國際分工不斷深化的背景下,中國制造業(yè)面臨著轉(zhuǎn)型升級等諸多問題,服務(wù)經(jīng)濟的迅速發(fā)展為中國制造業(yè)帶來了前所未有的機遇和挑戰(zhàn)。服務(wù)化是中國制造業(yè)打破現(xiàn)有低端發(fā)展模式,提高競爭力的可選模式。 本文分別用分工理論和價值鏈理論對制造業(yè)投入服務(wù)化和產(chǎn)出服務(wù)化現(xiàn)象出現(xiàn)的原因和意義進行了分析。在之后的實證部分,本文采用了比現(xiàn)有文獻更優(yōu)的指標(biāo)來分別衡量制造業(yè)的投入服務(wù)化和產(chǎn)出服務(wù)化水平,以提高實證結(jié)果的可靠性。 對投入服務(wù)化經(jīng)濟效應(yīng)的實證回歸表明,總體上中國制造業(yè)的投入服務(wù)化水平不高,未對制造業(yè)經(jīng)濟效益的提升起到積極作用。在生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)分行業(yè)對制造業(yè)的投入來看,只有技術(shù)服務(wù)投入與制造業(yè)經(jīng)濟效益正相關(guān),物流服務(wù)投入、信息服務(wù)投入、商務(wù)服務(wù)投入和金融服務(wù)投入均與制造業(yè)經(jīng)濟效益負相關(guān)。在對投入服務(wù)化經(jīng)濟效應(yīng)作用機制的檢驗中,交易費用和技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力均起到了不完全中介效應(yīng),投入服務(wù)化有利于降低交易費用,但交易費用與制造業(yè)經(jīng)濟效益正相關(guān),投入服務(wù)化未能提高中國制造業(yè)的技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力,技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力的提高起到了提升制造業(yè)經(jīng)濟效益的作用。 中國制造業(yè)總體上的產(chǎn)出服務(wù)化水平不高,并未能產(chǎn)生促進制造業(yè)盈利能力提升的效果。實證結(jié)果表明服務(wù)種類與制造企業(yè)盈利能力呈倒U型關(guān)系,服務(wù)強度和產(chǎn)出服務(wù)化綜合指標(biāo)與制造企業(yè)盈利能力負相關(guān)。將制造企業(yè)分為16個行業(yè)分別進行回歸,有6個行業(yè)出現(xiàn)了與總體回歸不同的回歸結(jié)果,其中交通運輸設(shè)備制造業(yè)的服務(wù)種類、紡織服裝鞋帽皮革羽絨及其制品業(yè)和非金屬礦物制品業(yè)的服務(wù)強度均與企業(yè)盈利能力呈正U型關(guān)系。在對作用機制的實證分析中,由于數(shù)據(jù)限制,只檢驗了交易費用的中介效應(yīng),結(jié)果顯示在對總體制造企業(yè)的回歸分析中交易費用并未起到中介效應(yīng)作用。對制造企業(yè)細分行業(yè)的中介效應(yīng)的存在性進行檢驗,結(jié)果顯示在4個行業(yè)中存在中介效應(yīng),交易費用在金屬冶煉及壓延加工業(yè)和計算機通信及其他電子設(shè)備制造業(yè)產(chǎn)出服務(wù)化經(jīng)濟效應(yīng)中發(fā)揮了完全中介效應(yīng),在食品制造及飲料加工業(yè)和其他制造業(yè)中發(fā)揮了不完全中介效應(yīng)。 根據(jù)實證分析結(jié)果,本文對中國制造業(yè)的服務(wù)化轉(zhuǎn)型提出了對策建議。從宏觀上看,應(yīng)建立利于制造業(yè)服務(wù)化和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展的政策體系和戰(zhàn)略規(guī)劃。微觀企業(yè)在服務(wù)化過程中應(yīng)注意以下兩點,—是要調(diào)整好業(yè)務(wù)流程和組織框架,減少部門間協(xié)調(diào)成本,二是要合理控制提供服務(wù)的種類,根據(jù)行業(yè)特點和自身情況有選擇地提供服務(wù)。
[Abstract]:Under the background of deepening international division of labor, China's manufacturing industry is facing many problems, such as transformation and upgrading. The rapid development of service economy has brought unprecedented opportunities and challenges to China's manufacturing industry. Service is an optional mode for Chinese manufacturing industry to break the existing low-end development model and improve its competitiveness. Based on the theory of division of labor and the theory of value chain, this paper analyzes the reasons and significance of the phenomenon of input service and output service in manufacturing industry. In the later empirical part, this paper uses better indicators than the existing literature to measure the service level of input and output of manufacturing industry, so as to improve the reliability of the empirical results. The empirical regression of the effect of input-service economy shows that the level of input-service in Chinese manufacturing industry is not high on the whole, and it has not played a positive role in improving the economic benefit of manufacturing industry. From the point of view of the input of producer services to the manufacturing industry, only the investment in technical services is positively related to the economic benefits of the manufacturing industry, the investment in logistics services and the input in information services. Business service investment and financial service investment are negatively correlated with manufacturing economic benefits. In the test of the mechanism of the economic effect of investment and service, the transaction cost and the ability of technological innovation have played an incomplete intermediary effect, and the investment in service is beneficial to reduce the transaction cost, but the transaction cost is positively related to the economic benefit of the manufacturing industry. The technical innovation ability of China's manufacturing industry has not been improved by the input of service, and the economic benefit of the manufacturing industry has been improved by the improvement of the technological innovation ability. China's manufacturing industry in general output service level is not high, and failed to promote the profitability of the manufacturing industry. The empirical results show that the service types are inversely U-shaped with the profitability of manufacturing enterprises, and the service intensity and output service-oriented comprehensive indicators are negatively correlated with the profitability of manufacturing enterprises. The manufacturing enterprises are divided into 16 industries respectively, and 6 industries have different regression results from the overall regression, among which, the service types of the transportation equipment manufacturing industry, The service strength of textile, clothing, shoes, hats, leather, down and its products and non-metallic mineral products is positively related to the profitability of the enterprises. In the empirical analysis of the mechanism of action, due to the data limitation, only the intermediary effect of transaction costs is tested. The results show that transaction costs do not play an intermediary role in the regression analysis of the overall manufacturing enterprises. The existence of intermediary effect in manufacturing enterprise subdivision industry is tested. The results show that intermediary effect exists in four industries. Transaction costs play a complete intermediary role in the service-oriented economic effects of output in the metal smelting and calender processing industries and in the manufacturing of computer communications and other electronic equipment. In food and beverage processing industry and other manufacturing industries played an incomplete intermediary effect. According to the results of empirical analysis, this paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions for the service transformation of Chinese manufacturing industry. From the macro point of view, we should establish a policy system and strategic planning conducive to the development of manufacturing services and producer services. Microenterprises should pay attention to the following two points in the process of service-oriented: adjusting business processes and organizational frameworks to reduce inter-departmental coordination costs, and second, rationally controlling the types of services provided. Provide services selectively according to the characteristics of the industry and its own circumstances.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F424

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 顧乃華;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展趨勢及其內(nèi)在機制——基于典型國家數(shù)據(jù)的實證分析[J];財經(jīng)論叢;2008年02期

2 劉志彪;全球化背景下中國制造業(yè)升級的路徑與品牌戰(zhàn)略[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2005年05期

3 陳健;史修松;;產(chǎn)業(yè)關(guān)聯(lián)、行業(yè)異質(zhì)性與生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟研究;2008年06期

4 顧乃華;;工業(yè)投入服務(wù)化:形成機制、經(jīng)濟效應(yīng)及其區(qū)域差異——基于投入產(chǎn)出數(shù)據(jù)和HLM模型的實證研究[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟研究;2010年03期

5 陳靜;雷厲;;中國制造業(yè)的生產(chǎn)率增長、技術(shù)進步與技術(shù)效率——基于DEA的實證分析[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟科學(xué);2010年04期

6 郭躍進;論制造業(yè)的服務(wù)化經(jīng)營趨勢[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;1999年03期

7 植草益;信息通訊業(yè)的產(chǎn)業(yè)融合[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2001年02期

8 周振華;產(chǎn)業(yè)融合:產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展及經(jīng)濟增長的新動力[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2003年04期

9 宋高歌,黃培清,帥萍;基于產(chǎn)品服務(wù)化的循環(huán)經(jīng)濟發(fā)展模式研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2005年05期

10 吳貴生;藺雷;;我國制造企業(yè)“服務(wù)增強”的實證研究及政策建議[J];管理工程學(xué)報;2011年04期

，

本文編號：2339414