本文關(guān)鍵詞：后危機(jī)時(shí)代中國(guó)制造業(yè)的轉(zhuǎn)型和升級(jí)　出處：《上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 后危機(jī)時(shí)代 中國(guó)制造業(yè) 轉(zhuǎn)型和升級(jí)

【摘要】：缺乏可持續(xù)性的增長(zhǎng)是中國(guó)制造業(yè)真正的挑戰(zhàn)。中國(guó)制造業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型和升級(jí)面臨著諸多長(zhǎng)期積累下來(lái)的結(jié)構(gòu)性問(wèn)題，產(chǎn)能過(guò)剩、重復(fù)建設(shè)、低效運(yùn)作、吸納再就業(yè)能力下降等等。雖然，在危機(jī)前中國(guó)制造業(yè)逐漸意識(shí)到這樣問(wèn)題，很多企業(yè)試圖向產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈兩端延伸，但延伸的步伐是趕不上成本提高的速度，“轉(zhuǎn)型”這一被動(dòng)措施卻給很多功能不全的制造企業(yè)帶來(lái)了挑戰(zhàn)。 我們說(shuō)，有效經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)從來(lái)都是基于資源優(yōu)化配置的內(nèi)生性選擇結(jié)果。當(dāng)前政府需要考慮的是如何在糾正資源錯(cuò)配的同時(shí)，通過(guò)穩(wěn)步推進(jìn)市場(chǎng)化改革來(lái)釋放經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)動(dòng)力，而非盲目實(shí)施政府支出從而放大投資在經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)中的作用。政府改革先行是制造業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型和升級(jí)成功的前提條件。基于經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)原理，生產(chǎn)關(guān)系一定要適應(yīng)生產(chǎn)力的發(fā)展要求。政府必須要改革轉(zhuǎn)型，實(shí)現(xiàn)全能型政府向服務(wù)型政府轉(zhuǎn)變，將不該管，管不好的事情交給市場(chǎng)（企業(yè)），更大程度發(fā)揮市場(chǎng)對(duì)配置資源的基礎(chǔ)作用，，轉(zhuǎn)型和升級(jí)需要公平的市場(chǎng)環(huán)境，在改革和革命之間，生產(chǎn)關(guān)系必須適應(yīng)生產(chǎn)力的發(fā)展，政府和市場(chǎng)(企業(yè))必須找一個(gè)契合點(diǎn)。 后危機(jī)時(shí)代的中國(guó)制造業(yè)不僅面臨著內(nèi)部改革的呼聲，還面臨著外部經(jīng)濟(jì)體的打壓，轉(zhuǎn)型和升級(jí)是中國(guó)制造業(yè)的無(wú)法回避的問(wèn)題，同時(shí)轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)也是一個(gè)長(zhǎng)期而且要持續(xù)堅(jiān)持的過(guò)程,只有靠轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)才能從根本上解決各種矛盾、困難和問(wèn)題。 在這個(gè)過(guò)程中，新興技術(shù)和新興產(chǎn)業(yè)將始終發(fā)揮主導(dǎo)作用，成為傳統(tǒng)產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)的重要引擎，我們一定要把握技術(shù)進(jìn)步與創(chuàng)新的方向，通過(guò)建立多項(xiàng)技術(shù)協(xié)同創(chuàng)新的新機(jī)制，提升制造業(yè)的整體發(fā)展水平與質(zhì)量，并為制造業(yè)的未來(lái)發(fā)展規(guī)劃出新的技術(shù)路徑與運(yùn)營(yíng)模式。
[Abstract]:The lack of sustainable growth is a real challenge for China's manufacturing industry, which faces a number of structural problems accumulated over a long period of time, such as overcapacity, repeated construction, and inefficient operation. Although before the crisis, China's manufacturing industry gradually realized this problem, many enterprises tried to extend to both ends of the industrial chain, but the pace of extension is not keeping up with the pace of rising costs. The passive measure of "transformation" has brought challenges to many incomplete manufacturing enterprises. We say that effective economic growth has always been the result of endogenous choices based on optimal allocation of resources. What the current government needs to consider is how to correct the mismatch of resources at the same time. To release the economic growth power through the steady promotion of market-oriented reform. Instead of blindly implementing government expenditure to amplify the role of investment in economic growth, government reform is a prerequisite for the success of the transformation and upgrading of manufacturing industry. The relations of production must adapt to the demands of the development of productive forces. The government must reform and transform, realize the transformation of omnipotent government to service-oriented government, and hand over to the market (enterprise) the things that should not be managed and those that are not well managed. To a greater extent, the market plays a fundamental role in the allocation of resources. The transformation and upgrading need a fair market environment. Between reform and revolution, the relations of production must adapt to the development of productive forces. The government and the market must find a point of convergence. The post-crisis era of China's manufacturing industry is not only facing the voice of internal reform, but also facing the pressure of external economies, transformation and upgrading of China's manufacturing industry is an unavoidable problem. At the same time, transformation and upgrading is also a long and persistent process, only by transformation and upgrading can we fundamentally solve all kinds of contradictions, difficulties and problems. In this process, emerging technologies and emerging industries will always play a leading role and become an important engine for the transformation and upgrading of traditional industries. We must grasp the direction of technological progress and innovation. Through the establishment of a new mechanism of multi-technology collaborative innovation, the overall development level and quality of manufacturing industry are improved, and a new technology path and operation mode are planned for the future development of manufacturing industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F424

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張楊;辜麗娟;余鈴;;淺談中國(guó)制造業(yè)的轉(zhuǎn)型之路[J];黑龍江對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào);2009年01期

2 莊曉;王海青;;我國(guó)制造業(yè)遇到的問(wèn)題及應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J];黑龍江對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào);2009年01期

3 李濤;;全球金融危機(jī)下的中國(guó)制造業(yè)戰(zhàn)略分析[J];合作經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2009年08期

4 單春紅;于謹(jǐn)凱;;中國(guó)制造業(yè)國(guó)際分工地位的產(chǎn)業(yè)價(jià)值鏈分析[J];江漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期

5 劉偉;張輝;;中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)中的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷和技術(shù)進(jìn)步[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年11期

6 蔡f ;王德文;曲s

本文編號(hào)：1376542