本文選題：服務(wù)業(yè)國(guó)際轉(zhuǎn)移 + 中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)增長(zhǎng)�。� 參考：《南京大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：1990年以來(lái),國(guó)際產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的主流領(lǐng)域從制造產(chǎn)業(yè)開(kāi)始轉(zhuǎn)向服務(wù)產(chǎn)業(yè),國(guó)際服務(wù)業(yè)的產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移興起于發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家之間市場(chǎng)貼近性的需要,而隨著通訊技術(shù)和發(fā)展中國(guó)家開(kāi)放程度的提高,發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家和發(fā)展中國(guó)家之間的服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移成為一種新趨勢(shì)。服務(wù)業(yè)國(guó)際產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的四種主要方式有：服務(wù)外商直接投資、服務(wù)外包、服務(wù)離岸以及非股權(quán)安排等,服務(wù)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移帶動(dòng)著人力資源、技術(shù)管理等高級(jí)要素的流動(dòng),跨國(guó)公司在全球的視角下達(dá)到了資源的合理配置以及全球產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的調(diào)整和變遷。 中國(guó)不僅僅是承接全球制造業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的大國(guó),同樣也是服務(wù)業(yè)國(guó)際轉(zhuǎn)移的重要承接國(guó)。中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)在利用外資投資中的比重是在一個(gè)不斷增加的過(guò)程中,中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)在整個(gè)國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)中的比重,占就業(yè)人口的比重也是呈現(xiàn)不斷上升的趨勢(shì)。 中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)的發(fā)展符合全球發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展過(guò)程中經(jīng)濟(jì)服務(wù)化的趨勢(shì),但參考美國(guó)以及其他發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的歷史發(fā)展經(jīng)驗(yàn)發(fā)現(xiàn),在服務(wù)業(yè)不斷上升的過(guò)程中都遭遇到生產(chǎn)率增長(zhǎng)率急劇下降的影響,以致直接拖累了經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的步伐。這種現(xiàn)象由鮑莫爾定義為“服務(wù)業(yè)成本病”�！胺⻊�(wù)業(yè)成本病”的本質(zhì)是服務(wù)業(yè)部門(mén)勞動(dòng)生產(chǎn)率的滯后性和服務(wù)價(jià)格的缺乏彈性�！胺⻊�(wù)業(yè)成本病”的發(fā)生可能是一個(gè)國(guó)家在經(jīng)濟(jì)服務(wù)化和國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)不斷發(fā)展過(guò)程中的一個(gè)普遍的必然發(fā)生的現(xiàn)象。 那么,服務(wù)業(yè)國(guó)際轉(zhuǎn)移會(huì)不會(huì)導(dǎo)致中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)成本病的發(fā)生?服務(wù)業(yè)國(guó)際轉(zhuǎn)移究竟會(huì)對(duì)中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)生怎樣的影響?這是本文試圖探討的兩大問(wèn)題。 本文運(yùn)用1995-2010年中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)的數(shù)據(jù)分析了由跨國(guó)公司主導(dǎo)的國(guó)際產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的動(dòng)態(tài)傳導(dǎo)機(jī)制,并通過(guò)拓展的鮑莫爾模型著重考察了在國(guó)際產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移沖擊下中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)增長(zhǎng)的效率：中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)的勞動(dòng)生產(chǎn)率的增長(zhǎng)和滯后情況、服務(wù)業(yè)的就業(yè)比例與增長(zhǎng)、服務(wù)業(yè)收入彈性和價(jià)格彈性的變化、服務(wù)業(yè)占國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)比例比重的變化等。結(jié)論表明： 1.服務(wù)業(yè)國(guó)際轉(zhuǎn)移并不會(huì)導(dǎo)致中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)成本病的發(fā)生。 2.服務(wù)業(yè)國(guó)際轉(zhuǎn)移對(duì)中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)生的影響具體表現(xiàn)在： (1)中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)勞動(dòng)生產(chǎn)率的滯后程度開(kāi)始收窄。 (2)中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)就業(yè)比例上升。 (3)中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)的收入彈性與價(jià)格彈性有變小的趨勢(shì)。 (4)長(zhǎng)期來(lái)看,中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)占GDP的比重隨收入水平的提高而上升。
[Abstract]:Since 1990, the mainstream field of international industrial transfer has shifted from manufacturing industry to service industry. The industrial transfer of international service industry has arisen in the need of market closeness among developed countries.With the development of communication technology and the openness of developing countries, the transfer of service industries between developed and developing countries has become a new trend.The four main ways of international industrial transfer of service industry are: foreign direct investment in service, service outsourcing, offshore service and non-equity arrangement, etc. The transfer of service industry drives the flow of high-level elements such as human resources, technology management, etc.Multinational corporations in the global perspective of the rational allocation of resources and the adjustment and change of the global industrial structure.China is not only a large country undertaking global manufacturing transfer, but also an important recipient of international service transfer.The proportion of China's service industry in the utilization of foreign investment is in a process of increasing. The proportion of China's service industry in the whole national economy and the proportion of the employed population is also showing a rising trend.The development of China's service industry is in line with the trend of service-oriented economy in the process of economic development in developed countries around the world. However, referring to the historical development experience of the United States and other developed countries, it is found thatIn the process of rising service industries, the impact of a sharp decline in productivity growth has directly dragged down the pace of economic growth.This phenomenon is defined by Baumer as "service cost sickness."The essence of service cost disease is the lag of labor productivity and the inelasticity of service price.The occurrence of "service cost disease" may be a universal and inevitable phenomenon in the process of economic service and the continuous development of national economy.So, will the international transfer of service industry lead to the occurrence of cost disease in China's service industry?What kind of impact will international transfer of service industry have on Chinese service industry?These are two major problems this paper attempts to explore.This paper analyzes the dynamic transmission mechanism of international industrial transfer, which is dominated by multinational corporations, using Chinese service industry data from 1995 to 2010.And through the expanded Baumer model, the paper focuses on the efficiency of China's service industry growth under the impact of international industrial transfer: the growth and lag of labor productivity of China's service industry, the employment ratio and growth of the service industry.The change of income elasticity and price elasticity of service industry, the change of proportion of service industry to national economy and so on.The results show that:1.International transfer of service industry will not lead to the occurrence of cost disease in China's service industry.2.The impact of international transfer of service industry on Chinese service industry is as follows:The lag of labor productivity in China's service industry has begun to narrow.Employment in China's service sector rose.The income elasticity and price elasticity of China's service industry tend to decrease.In the long run, the share of China's service industry in GDP rises with rising income levels.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F719

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 程大中;論服務(wù)業(yè)在國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)中的“黏合劑”作用[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年02期

2 程大中;;中國(guó)生產(chǎn)者服務(wù)業(yè)的增長(zhǎng)、結(jié)構(gòu)變化及其影響——基于投入—產(chǎn)出法的分析[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年10期

3 郁義鴻,黃云峰;服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)變貢獻(xiàn)的一項(xiàng)實(shí)證研究[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2003年05期

4 劉偉,李紹榮;產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年05期

5 顧乃華;畢斗斗;任旺兵;;中國(guó)轉(zhuǎn)型期生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展與制造業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力關(guān)系研究——基于面板數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證分析[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年09期

6 俞梅珍;服務(wù)業(yè)跨國(guó)投資的發(fā)展及其影響[J];華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年02期

7 卿前龍;陳昭;胡躍紅;;服務(wù)業(yè):“鮑莫爾病”還是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)?——美國(guó)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)及其對(duì)中國(guó)的啟示[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年05期

8 張紅霞,李平;我國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)外商直接投資問(wèn)題研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2004年09期

9 劉志彪;;基于制造業(yè)基礎(chǔ)的現(xiàn)代生產(chǎn)者服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展[J];江蘇行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期

10 Mary Amiti;魏尚進(jìn);劉曉萍;張明志;;服務(wù)外包、生產(chǎn)率與就業(yè)：基于美國(guó)的實(shí)證[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)資料譯叢;2006年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 曹躍群;中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀及對(duì)策研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2004年

2 周文彬;全球服務(wù)業(yè)FDI的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)及中國(guó)的對(duì)策[D];中共中央黨校;2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1760776