本文選題：創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn) + 營(yíng)銷(xiāo)能力��； 參考：《江西師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái)國(guó)家出臺(tái)一系列調(diào)控政策，旨在抑制房地產(chǎn)過(guò)熱，目前房地產(chǎn)業(yè)受到政策的制約面臨壓力，很多房地產(chǎn)開(kāi)發(fā)企業(yè)面臨轉(zhuǎn)型的需求，商業(yè)地產(chǎn)、旅游地產(chǎn)、老年地產(chǎn)等房地產(chǎn)類(lèi)型受到很多開(kāi)發(fā)企業(yè)的追捧，，作為與創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)相結(jié)合創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)也開(kāi)始成為了開(kāi)發(fā)企業(yè)關(guān)注的重點(diǎn)。隨著798、新天地等一系列創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)的成功，創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)逐漸為各個(gè)地區(qū)所追捧。由于創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)注重創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)與地產(chǎn)的結(jié)合，很多地區(qū)盲目上馬創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)項(xiàng)目，缺乏相應(yīng)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)，很多項(xiàng)目還是沿襲傳統(tǒng)的營(yíng)銷(xiāo)方式，導(dǎo)致很多地區(qū)創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)都是有名無(wú)實(shí)。 本文在梳理現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上，從制約我國(guó)創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)發(fā)展的主要因素—營(yíng)銷(xiāo)能力作為切入口，通過(guò)實(shí)踐調(diào)查，分析目前創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)存在缺乏戰(zhàn)略層面的統(tǒng)籌，前期定位缺乏科學(xué)性；品牌塑造型不強(qiáng)，同質(zhì)化現(xiàn)象嚴(yán)重；創(chuàng)意內(nèi)涵缺失，消費(fèi)者吸引力差；價(jià)值鏈斷鏈，缺乏整合營(yíng)銷(xiāo)觀念等問(wèn)題。在此基礎(chǔ)上，本文從模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)基礎(chǔ)上構(gòu)建一個(gè)創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)營(yíng)銷(xiāo)能力評(píng)價(jià)框架，對(duì)影響創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)營(yíng)銷(xiāo)能力的各大因素進(jìn)行研究，指出影響我國(guó)創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)營(yíng)銷(xiāo)能力的因素主要包括營(yíng)銷(xiāo)戰(zhàn)略、營(yíng)銷(xiāo)組織能力、品牌和營(yíng)銷(xiāo)傳播能力、創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力、顧客關(guān)系價(jià)值這五個(gè)方面，其中營(yíng)銷(xiāo)戰(zhàn)略為最重要指標(biāo)，其次為創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力。 在全面系統(tǒng)的研究創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)營(yíng)銷(xiāo)能力的因素之后，本文以南昌市創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)樟樹(shù)林項(xiàng)目為例，通過(guò)實(shí)證研究該項(xiàng)目的營(yíng)銷(xiāo)能力，來(lái)說(shuō)明創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)營(yíng)銷(xiāo)能力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的具體運(yùn)用方式。通過(guò)模型分析得出樟樹(shù)林項(xiàng)目營(yíng)銷(xiāo)能力處于中等水平，其核心問(wèn)題在于樟樹(shù)林創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力較弱，這主要是由于項(xiàng)目前期營(yíng)銷(xiāo)定位失誤，以及創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)模塊的缺失，使得創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)逐漸變味為傳統(tǒng)的商業(yè)地產(chǎn)運(yùn)營(yíng)。 創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)能力提升的幾點(diǎn)建議：樹(shù)立營(yíng)銷(xiāo)戰(zhàn)略思想，明確市場(chǎng)定位；改變營(yíng)銷(xiāo)觀念，建立以營(yíng)銷(xiāo)為導(dǎo)向組織；以體驗(yàn)營(yíng)銷(xiāo)為先導(dǎo)，樹(shù)立項(xiàng)目品牌；實(shí)行多重人才開(kāi)發(fā)政策，建設(shè)專(zhuān)業(yè)人才隊(duì)伍；構(gòu)建完善的產(chǎn)業(yè)服務(wù)體系，提升創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力；以消費(fèi)者為核心，提高顧客忠誠(chéng)度。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the state has issued a series of control policies aimed at curbing the overheating of real estate. At present, the real estate industry is under pressure from policy constraints. Many real estate development enterprises are facing the demand for transformation. Commercial real estate, tourism real estate, The old real estate and other real estate types are sought after by many development enterprises, and as a combination of creative industries, creative real estate has become the focus of attention of development enterprises. With 798, Xintiandi and a series of creative real estate success, creative property gradually for all regions. Because creative real estate pays attention to the combination of creative industry and real estate, many areas blindly start creative real estate projects, lack corresponding experience, many projects still follow the traditional marketing methods, leading to many regions creative real estate are nominal. On the basis of combing the existing literature research results, from the main factor of restricting the development of creative real estate in China-marketing ability as the entry point, through practical investigation, this paper analyzes the lack of strategic coordination of the current creative real estate. The previous positioning is lack of science; the brand shaping type is not strong, the homogeneity phenomenon is serious; the creative connotation is lacking, the consumer attraction is poor; the value chain breaks the chain, lacks the integrated marketing idea and so on. On this basis, this paper constructs an evaluation framework of creative real estate marketing ability on the basis of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and studies the factors that affect the creative real estate marketing ability. The paper points out that the factors influencing the marketing ability of creative real estate in China include five aspects: marketing strategy, marketing organization ability, brand and marketing communication ability, creative industry competitiveness and customer relationship value, among which marketing strategy is the most important index. Secondly, the competitiveness of creative industries. After a comprehensive and systematic study on the factors of creative real estate marketing ability, this paper takes the project of camphor tree forest in Nanchang City as an example to study the marketing ability of the project. To illustrate the creative real estate marketing capacity evaluation of the specific use of indicators. Through the model analysis, it is concluded that the project marketing ability of camphor forest is at a medium level, and the core problem lies in the weak competitiveness of the creative industry of camphor forest, which is mainly due to the misorientation of marketing in the early stage of the project and the lack of the module of creative industry. Make creative real estate gradually change flavor for the traditional commercial real estate operation. Some suggestions for improving the ability of creative real estate are as follows: to set up the marketing strategy thought, to define the market orientation, to change the marketing concept, to establish the market-oriented organization, to take the experience marketing as the forerunner, to establish the project brand, and to carry out the policy of multi-talent development. Build professional talent team, construct perfect industry service system, enhance creative industry competitiveness, take consumer as the core, improve customer loyalty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F299.233.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔡勇;趙平;;整合營(yíng)銷(xiāo)傳播的心理作用模式[J];商業(yè)研究;2006年06期

2 莊新田;劉洋;;基于情景樹(shù)的多期模糊層次資產(chǎn)配置[J];管理工程學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

3 秦吉,張翼鵬;現(xiàn)代統(tǒng)計(jì)信息分析技術(shù)在安全工程方面的應(yīng)用——層次分析法原理[J];工業(yè)安全與防塵;1999年05期

4 王瓊輝;劉杰;薛曉紅;;創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)租金定價(jià)方法的影響因素分析——以上海創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)聚集區(qū)類(lèi)BOT模式為例[J];價(jià)格理論與實(shí)踐;2007年08期

5 陳成程,王永安;房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)營(yíng)銷(xiāo)能力評(píng)價(jià)分析[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年04期

6 趙蕾;傅鴻源;;創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)與城市發(fā)展——以重慶為例[J];價(jià)值工程;2008年11期

7 佟賀豐;英國(guó)文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展概況及其啟示[J];科技與管理;2005年01期

8 周畢文;鄭翠萍;;城市化過(guò)程中創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)到創(chuàng)意地產(chǎn)的發(fā)展理路[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2008年22期

9 馮嘉;;企業(yè)營(yíng)銷(xiāo)能力綜述[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2009年14期

10 王謖萍;潘瑾;;上海創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀與戰(zhàn)略研究[J];中國(guó)市場(chǎng);2009年40期

本文編號(hào)：1856928