本文選題：協(xié)議管轄　切入點：電子商務糾紛　出處：《安徽大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：伴隨著電子信息時代的飛速發(fā)展,人們的生活方式發(fā)生了巨大的改變。人們的生活日益離不開網絡,從購物到工作,無不可以通過網絡來完成,催生了電子商務的繁榮發(fā)展�；ヂ�(lián)網具有虛擬性和跨地域性,因此,電子商務糾紛與傳統(tǒng)的民事糾紛存在著很大的不同。電子商務糾紛的解決刻不容緩,而關于協(xié)議管轄的糾紛在電子商務糾紛中占有很大的比例。實務中電子商務糾紛的協(xié)議管轄權是根據民訴法關于民事管轄的一般規(guī)定來確定的,并沒有特別的規(guī)定。民事訴訟法三十四條規(guī)定的協(xié)議管轄的五個連接點在電子商務中并不合適。如何解決這類問題,如何完善協(xié)議管轄制度使其能更好應用于電子商務糾紛中去,也日益受到法律界和學術界關注。協(xié)議管轄,又稱為約定管轄。參照不同的標準可將協(xié)議管轄作出不一樣的分類。比如,以是否包含涉外因素,協(xié)議管轄可區(qū)分為國內和涉外民事案件協(xié)議管轄兩類。以當事人是否以明示作為其意思表示形式作為區(qū)分的標準,協(xié)議管轄又可區(qū)分為明示的協(xié)議管轄和默示的協(xié)議管轄。以當事人之間的協(xié)議是否具有排他性作為區(qū)分的標準,協(xié)議管轄則可區(qū)分為排他性的協(xié)議管轄和非排他性的協(xié)議管轄。作為一種制度,適用協(xié)議管轄需具備相應的條件。而協(xié)議管轄制度則經歷了從沒有到有、從不是很完善到逐步被完善的過程。伴隨著信息時代,把互聯(lián)網作為載體的電子商務逐漸的發(fā)展了起來。在電子商務中,當事人的管轄權協(xié)議大多是包含在格式合同中,因此電子商務中的協(xié)議管轄的協(xié)議方式多表現(xiàn)為格式條款。在電子商務各方交易過程中,關于電子商務糾紛案件管轄權的確立有層出不窮的問題。比如孫丁丁訴江蘇蘇寧易購電子商務有限公司一案,就反應了司法實踐中如何界定經營者已經采取合理方式提請其消費者注意,沒有統(tǒng)一的標準,以及怎樣的方式可以被認定為是合理方式很難界定。電子商務糾紛中被告住所地、合同履行地、合同簽訂地很難確定,部分案件若是直接適用協(xié)議管轄則會出現(xiàn)顯失公平的現(xiàn)象。這些都對當下的協(xié)議管轄制度造成了很大的沖擊。我們要完善協(xié)議管轄制度,以使其能更好的解決電子商務糾紛。為此,首先,電子商務糾紛案件的協(xié)議管轄制度應堅持三原則,它們分別是同等保護之原則、便利訴訟之原則和意思自治之原則。其次,我們要為電子商務糾紛案件的協(xié)議管轄制度確立消費者住所地管轄規(guī)則和將網址作為新的管轄連接點之規(guī)則。最后,協(xié)議管轄需要被進行必要的限制,我們可以把以合理方式提請消費者注意的標準進行細化。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of electronic information age, people's way of life has undergone tremendous changes.People's life is increasingly inseparable from the network, from shopping to work, can be completed through the network, ecommerce prosperity and development.Internet is virtual and cross-regional, so there is a great difference between e-commerce disputes and traditional civil disputes.The settlement of e-commerce dispute is urgent, and the dispute about agreement jurisdiction occupies a large proportion in e-commerce dispute.In practice, the agreement jurisdiction of electronic commerce disputes is determined according to the general provisions of civil jurisdiction in civil litigation law, and there are no special provisions.The five points of connection governed by agreement under article 34 of the Code of Civil procedure are not appropriate in e-commerce.How to solve this kind of problems and how to perfect the agreement jurisdiction system so that it can be better applied in the dispute of electronic commerce has been paid more and more attention by the legal and academic circles.Agreement jurisdiction, also known as contract jurisdiction.Agreement jurisdiction may be classified differently by reference to different criteria.For example, according to whether to include foreign factors, the jurisdiction of agreement can be divided into two categories: domestic and foreign civil cases.The agreement jurisdiction can be divided into express agreement jurisdiction and implied agreement jurisdiction.The criterion of whether the agreement between the parties is exclusive or not, the agreement jurisdiction can be divided into exclusive agreement jurisdiction and non-exclusive agreement jurisdiction.As a kind of system, the applicable agreement jurisdiction must have the corresponding condition.But the agreement jurisdiction system has experienced from no to have, never is very perfect to be perfected step by step.With the information age, the Internet as a carrier of e-commerce has gradually developed.In electronic commerce, the parties' jurisdiction agreement is mostly included in the format contract, so the agreement in the electronic commerce is mostly embodied in the form clause.In the course of dealing with each side of e-commerce, the establishment of the jurisdiction of the dispute case of e-commerce arises in endlessly.For example, the case of Sun Dingding v. Jiangsu Su Ning E-Commerce Co., Ltd. reflects how to define in judicial practice how the operator has taken a reasonable approach to draw his consumers' attention to the fact that there is no uniform standard.And how it can be considered reasonable is difficult to define.It is difficult to determine the place where the defendant is domiciled, the place where the contract is performed and the place where the contract is signed in electronic commerce disputes.All these have had a great impact on the current system of agreement jurisdiction.We must perfect the agreement jurisdiction system, in order to enable it to solve the electronic commerce dispute better.Therefore, first of all, the agreed jurisdiction system of electronic commerce dispute cases should adhere to three principles, they are the principle of equal protection, the principle of facilitating litigation and the principle of autonomy of will.Secondly, we should establish the rules of jurisdiction of consumer domicile and the rule of using web site as the new jurisdiction link for electronic commerce dispute cases.Finally, jurisdiction needs to be limited as necessary, and we can refine the criteria that are brought to the attention of consumers in a reasonable manner.
【學位授予單位】：安徽大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 邵明;;我國涉外民事訴訟程序之完善[J];中國人民大學學報;2012年04期

2 奚曉明;論我國涉外民商事訴訟中協(xié)議管轄條款的認定(下)[J];法律適用(國家法官學院學報);2002年04期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 董倩;論電子商務中消費者的權益保護[D];首都經濟貿易大學;2011年

2 張旭東;國際民事訴訟管轄權比較研究[D];中國政法大學;2006年

，

本文編號：1702757