【摘要】：產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移是產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整和升級(jí)的重要途徑，產(chǎn)業(yè)在特定區(qū)域的集聚與轉(zhuǎn)移是有規(guī)律可循的。我國(guó)紡織產(chǎn)業(yè)是重要的民生產(chǎn)業(yè)，也是產(chǎn)業(yè)區(qū)域轉(zhuǎn)移的先行產(chǎn)業(yè)。改革開放至今，我國(guó)紡織產(chǎn)業(yè)逐步走向成熟，但是區(qū)域發(fā)展極不平衡，東部地區(qū)集聚趨勢(shì)明顯，而中西部地區(qū)發(fā)展緩慢。隨著東部地區(qū)成本的增加，以及中西部地區(qū)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的完善，我國(guó)紡織產(chǎn)業(yè)逐步向中西部轉(zhuǎn)移，但是大規(guī)模的轉(zhuǎn)移并沒有發(fā)生。本文重點(diǎn)分析影響我國(guó)紡織產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的因素，并試圖解釋我國(guó)紡織產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移滯緩的原因。 在相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)綜述的基礎(chǔ)上，本文利用空間經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)中心-外圍模型規(guī)范分析勞動(dòng)生產(chǎn)率差異對(duì)于產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的影響。并且定量測(cè)度2004-2012年間中國(guó)31個(gè)省、直轄市、自治區(qū)紡織產(chǎn)業(yè)的集聚程度以及勞動(dòng)生產(chǎn)率，建立回歸模型，進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析。結(jié)果表明，，較高的勞動(dòng)生產(chǎn)率有利于紡織產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚，而且產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚具有粘性作用，不利產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移。考慮其他影響因素，區(qū)位因素、勞動(dòng)生產(chǎn)率、國(guó)際市場(chǎng)需求、產(chǎn)業(yè)環(huán)境和運(yùn)輸成本對(duì)中國(guó)紡織產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移有顯著影響。而國(guó)內(nèi)市場(chǎng)需求以及產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展?jié)摿?duì)中國(guó)紡織產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的作用并不明顯。 規(guī)范分析和實(shí)證研究表明，產(chǎn)業(yè)趨向于向成本較低的中西部地區(qū)轉(zhuǎn)移，但是中國(guó)東部紡織產(chǎn)業(yè)尚未達(dá)到產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的內(nèi)生臨界點(diǎn)，大規(guī)模的產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移并沒有發(fā)生。要素稟賦因素、勞動(dòng)生產(chǎn)率差異、市場(chǎng)因素、產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)因素、運(yùn)輸因素是影響產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的主要因素�，F(xiàn)階段，我國(guó)紡織業(yè)向西部轉(zhuǎn)移滯緩的主要原因有：東部地區(qū)區(qū)位優(yōu)勢(shì)、勞動(dòng)生產(chǎn)率優(yōu)勢(shì)，以及較高的運(yùn)輸成本。
[Abstract]:Industrial transfer is an important way to adjust and upgrade industrial structure. China's textile industry is an important livelihood industry, but also a leading industry of industrial regional transfer. Since the reform and opening up to date, the textile industry in China has gradually matured, but the regional development is extremely unbalanced, the trend of agglomeration in the eastern region is obvious, and the development of the central and western regions is slow. With the increase of cost in the eastern region and the improvement of the infrastructure in the central and western regions, the textile industry of our country has gradually transferred to the central and western regions, but the large-scale transfer has not occurred. This paper analyzes the factors affecting the transfer of textile industry in China and tries to explain the reasons for the sluggish transfer of textile industry in China. On the basis of literature review, this paper analyzes the influence of labor productivity difference on industrial transfer by using spatial economics centre-periphery model. The paper also quantitatively measures the concentration degree and labor productivity of textile industry in 31 provinces municipalities and autonomous regions in China from 2004 to 2012 and establishes a regression model to carry out empirical analysis. The results show that higher labor productivity is beneficial to textile industry agglomeration, and industrial agglomeration has viscous effect, which is disadvantageous to industrial transfer. Considering other influence factors, location factor, labor productivity, international market demand, industrial environment and transportation cost, there are significant effects on the transfer of China's textile industry. But the domestic market demand and the industry development potential to the Chinese textile industry transfer function is not obvious. Normative analysis and empirical research show that the industry tends to transfer to the lower cost of the central and western regions, but the textile industry in eastern China has not reached the endogenous critical point of industrial transfer, large-scale industrial transfer has not occurred. Factor endowment factor, labor productivity difference, market factor, industry competition factor and transportation factor are the main factors influencing industrial transfer. At the present stage, the main reasons for the slow transfer of textile industry to the west of China are as follows: location advantage, labor productivity advantage and higher transportation cost in the eastern region.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F426.81;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鮑飛;涂建華;;珠三角產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移研究[J];現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)科技;2009年02期

2 何青松;臧旭恒;趙寶廷;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的起源:一個(gè)中心外圍模型的擴(kuò)展[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;2008年02期

3 洪進(jìn);余文濤;趙定濤;;創(chuàng)意階層空間集聚與區(qū)域勞動(dòng)生產(chǎn)率差異——基于中國(guó)省際面板數(shù)據(jù)的分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2011年07期

4 馬子紅;;基于成本視角的區(qū)際產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移動(dòng)因分析[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年08期

5 山社武;劉志勇;張德生;;勞動(dòng)力自由流動(dòng)是阻礙傳統(tǒng)產(chǎn)業(yè)區(qū)域轉(zhuǎn)移的根本原因嗎?——基于27個(gè)產(chǎn)業(yè)的實(shí)證分析[J];財(cái)貿(mào)研究;2010年05期

6 石奇;張繼良;;區(qū)際產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移與欠發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)工業(yè)化的協(xié)調(diào)性[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年01期

7 朱剛;;國(guó)際產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的負(fù)面效應(yīng)分析[J];科技和產(chǎn)業(yè);2006年07期

8 吳曉軍,趙海東;產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移與欠發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2004年06期

9 隋映輝;解學(xué)梅;趙琨;;全球產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移:分散化、集群路徑與規(guī)制[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年08期

10 蔣國(guó)政;張毅;黃小勇;;要素稟賦、政策支持與金融資源配置:產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的承接模式研究[J];南方金融;2011年02期

本文編號(hào)：2399116