本文選題：高校創(chuàng)新 + 產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新�。� 參考：《曲阜師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：高校、科研機(jī)構(gòu)和高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)群的科技創(chuàng)新,對(duì)于促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型、產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)和社會(huì)發(fā)展具有重要作用,應(yīng)提升產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新對(duì)區(qū)域創(chuàng)新的驅(qū)動(dòng)作用。本文首先以28個(gè)省區(qū)及省區(qū)內(nèi)高校作為研究對(duì)象,利用2004-2014年的省際面板數(shù)據(jù),構(gòu)建極值邊界分析模型,對(duì)區(qū)域創(chuàng)新績(jī)效中高校創(chuàng)新的作用進(jìn)行了實(shí)證研究。其次以高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)為研究對(duì)象,利用2001-2014年高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)5大行業(yè)17個(gè)細(xì)分行業(yè)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)構(gòu)建面板門限模型,分別以市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力水平、RD人力資本投入、RD資本投入、行業(yè)技術(shù)差距為門檻變量,探究了FDI對(duì)區(qū)域內(nèi)高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)的技術(shù)溢出過(guò)程中是否存在門檻效應(yīng)。最后從產(chǎn)學(xué)協(xié)同創(chuàng)新的視角提供相關(guān)政策建議。第一部分梳理了國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者關(guān)于高校創(chuàng)新、產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新和區(qū)域創(chuàng)新績(jī)效的學(xué)術(shù)研究成果,并對(duì)當(dāng)前研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要分析。第二部分是對(duì)理論模型的構(gòu)建。首先對(duì)高校創(chuàng)新對(duì)中影響創(chuàng)新效率的因素進(jìn)行界定,并構(gòu)建了極值邊界分析的理論模型;其次,對(duì)影響高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效的因素進(jìn)行界定:市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力水平、研發(fā)人力和資本存量、行業(yè)技術(shù)差距等,并以Hansen的面板門檻效應(yīng)模型為基礎(chǔ)構(gòu)建了理論模型。第三部分實(shí)證分析了高校創(chuàng)新對(duì)區(qū)域創(chuàng)新績(jī)效的作用。結(jié)果顯示,高校創(chuàng)新對(duì)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效的影響存在著明顯的區(qū)域差異。高�？蒲薪�(jīng)費(fèi)支出水平對(duì)三大經(jīng)濟(jì)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效均具有顯著影響,但高校科研人力投入和高�？萍紘�(guó)際交流與合作對(duì)區(qū)域創(chuàng)新并無(wú)顯著影響;高校科研基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)僅對(duì)中部和西部地區(qū)創(chuàng)新能力有顯著正向影響,東部地區(qū)不明顯;高校原始創(chuàng)新能力僅在東、中部地區(qū)發(fā)揮作用,西部地區(qū)不顯著;高校科技成果轉(zhuǎn)化僅對(duì)中部地區(qū)創(chuàng)新有顯著提升作用,東、西部地區(qū)不顯著。第四部分實(shí)證分析了以高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)為代表的企業(yè)創(chuàng)新過(guò)程中是否存在門檻效應(yīng)。結(jié)果顯示,市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力水平、吸收能力、行業(yè)技術(shù)差距等因素對(duì)于創(chuàng)新效率的影響存在雙重門檻效應(yīng)。市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力只有超過(guò)了0.125,外商直接投資對(duì)于高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)的技術(shù)溢出,才會(huì)明顯;RD人力資本投入應(yīng)適當(dāng)投入,當(dāng)超過(guò)了11.369后,會(huì)產(chǎn)生擁擠效應(yīng);考察的所有門檻變量中,RD資本投入是與高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)最為密切聯(lián)系的變量;高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)只有在達(dá)到一定規(guī)模的行業(yè)技術(shù)差距后,才會(huì)出現(xiàn)明顯的技術(shù)外溢效應(yīng)。第五部分根據(jù)實(shí)證研究的結(jié)論提出對(duì)策和建議,這對(duì)于促進(jìn)創(chuàng)新主體多元化,推進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式的轉(zhuǎn)變有一定的參考價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:The scientific and technological innovation of universities, scientific research institutions and high-tech industrial clusters plays an important role in promoting economic transformation, industrial upgrading and social development.In this paper, 28 provinces, autonomous regions and universities are taken as the research objects. Using the inter-provincial panel data from 2004 to 2014, a model of extreme boundary analysis is constructed, and an empirical study on the role of university innovation in the performance of regional innovation is carried out.Secondly, taking high-tech industry as the research object, using the experience data of 17 subdivision industries in 5 major industries of high-tech industry from 2001 to 2014, the panel threshold model is constructed, and the R D human capital input is taken as the level of market competitiveness, respectively.The industrial technology gap is the threshold variable, and the threshold effect is explored in the process of FDI spillover to the high-tech industry in the region.Finally, it provides relevant policy suggestions from the perspective of collaborative innovation of industry and learning.The first part reviews the academic research results of university innovation, industrial innovation and regional innovation performance, and briefly analyzes the current research situation.The second part is the construction of theoretical model.Firstly, the paper defines the factors that affect the efficiency of innovation in colleges and universities, and constructs the theoretical model of extreme value boundary analysis. Secondly, it defines the factors that affect the innovation performance of high-tech industries: the level of market competitiveness.Based on the panel threshold effect model of Hansen, the theoretical model is constructed based on R & D manpower and capital stock, industry technology gap and so on.The third part empirically analyzes the effect of university innovation on regional innovation performance.The results show that there are obvious regional differences in the impact of innovation on innovation performance.The level of expenditure on scientific research has a significant impact on the performance of the three major economic innovation, but the investment of scientific research manpower and international exchange and cooperation of university science and technology have no significant impact on regional innovation.The construction of scientific research infrastructure in colleges and universities only has a significant positive impact on the innovation ability in the central and western regions, but not in the eastern region, while the original innovation ability of colleges and universities only plays a role in the east and the central region, but not in the western region.The transformation of scientific and technological achievements in colleges and universities can only promote innovation in the central region, but not in the east and west regions.The fourth part empirically analyzes whether the threshold effect exists in the innovation process of high-tech industry.The results show that there are double threshold effects on innovation efficiency due to market competitiveness, absorptive capacity and industry technology gap.Only when the competitiveness of the market exceeds 0.125, the technology spillover of foreign direct investment to the high-tech industry will obviously lead to the appropriate input of R D human capital, and when it exceeds 11.369, it will produce the crowding effect;Among all the threshold variables, R D capital input is the most closely related to the technology spillover effect of high-tech industry.The fifth part puts forward the countermeasures and suggestions according to the conclusion of the empirical research, which has certain reference value for promoting the diversification of innovation subjects and promoting the transformation of economic growth mode.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F124.3;G644

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李憲印;于婷;劉忠花;;基于EBA模型的高校創(chuàng)新與區(qū)域創(chuàng)新的協(xié)同作用研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理評(píng)論;2017年02期

2 李憲印;楊娜;劉鐘毓;;大學(xué)生學(xué)業(yè)成就的構(gòu)成因素及其實(shí)證研究——以地方普通高等學(xué)校為例[J];教育研究;2016年10期

3 王鵬;張劍波;;高校創(chuàng)新投入、產(chǎn)學(xué)合作與大中型工業(yè)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新產(chǎn)出——基于我國(guó)十三省市面板數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證研究[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年10期

4 齊秀娟;;區(qū)域創(chuàng)新與地方高校人才培養(yǎng)的耦合——以秦皇島市為例[J];現(xiàn)代交際;2014年09期

5 羅瑩;馬力;由曉霞;;淺談區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展視域下的地方高校創(chuàng)新型人才培養(yǎng)[J];教育探索;2014年06期

6 余冬筠;金祥榮;;創(chuàng)新主體的創(chuàng)新效率區(qū)域比較研究[J];科研管理;2014年03期

7 張鵬;于偉;;高校對(duì)區(qū)域創(chuàng)新效率的影響:基于隨機(jī)前沿生產(chǎn)函數(shù)的分析[J];教育與經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年06期

8 李林;傅慶;;產(chǎn)學(xué)研主體創(chuàng)新效率對(duì)區(qū)域創(chuàng)新的影響研究[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2014年05期

9 薛二勇;;協(xié)同創(chuàng)新與高校創(chuàng)新人才培養(yǎng)政策分析[J];中國(guó)高教研究;2012年12期

10 鄭軍;翟華云;;企業(yè)、政府、金融機(jī)構(gòu)科技投入與高校科技產(chǎn)出的關(guān)系研究[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2012年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉小明;福建省高�？萍紕�(chuàng)新能力與體系研究[D];福州大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1767891