本文選題：高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)　切入點(diǎn)：創(chuàng)新政策　出處：《電子科技大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：十八大以來(lái),創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略成為實(shí)現(xiàn)我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展方式轉(zhuǎn)變的國(guó)家戰(zhàn)略。創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)在高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)活動(dòng)中尤為重要。隨著高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)的突飛猛進(jìn),國(guó)際社會(huì)普遍將其視為度量一個(gè)國(guó)家的國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的大小的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)尺度。因此,各國(guó)均將優(yōu)先發(fā)展高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)作為一種必要的政府行為,這種政府行為也日趨制度化,可以說(shuō)政府政策在很大程度上對(duì)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展起到了推波助瀾的作用。對(duì)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新政策的研究,尤其是跨國(guó)間政策的深入研究,探索他國(guó)創(chuàng)新政策與高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展之間的關(guān)系,研究如何設(shè)計(jì)和制定有利于我國(guó)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的創(chuàng)新政策已然成為多數(shù)學(xué)者近些年來(lái)研究的關(guān)注點(diǎn)。創(chuàng)新政策是國(guó)家或地區(qū)推動(dòng)創(chuàng)新發(fā)展的政策組合,是一個(gè)包括財(cái)政、稅收、法律、金融等各種政策的復(fù)雜政策體系,處于該體系中的每一政策不是孤立存在的,各個(gè)政策彼此之間相互影響與作用,從而發(fā)揮政策間的協(xié)同作用,其主要功能是營(yíng)造國(guó)家創(chuàng)新環(huán)境,激發(fā)創(chuàng)新參與者的創(chuàng)新能力,保護(hù)創(chuàng)新成果,最終實(shí)現(xiàn)創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)發(fā)展。高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新政策,即圍繞推動(dòng)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新為主的由政府發(fā)布的包括財(cái)政、稅收、法律、金融等各種政策的政策體系。政策工具作為一種橋梁,在創(chuàng)新政策與政策目標(biāo)之間起到了連接作用,因此對(duì)創(chuàng)新政策工具間的相互作用的研究,能夠很好的說(shuō)明各項(xiàng)創(chuàng)新政策間的相互關(guān)系。本文通過(guò)對(duì)比中美高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展各個(gè)不同階段,收集和歸類(lèi)整理兩國(guó)創(chuàng)新政策文本。首先,以創(chuàng)新政策制定和執(zhí)行的主體為切入點(diǎn),探尋兩國(guó)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新政策運(yùn)行機(jī)制的異同及政策類(lèi)型與內(nèi)容的協(xié)調(diào)情況。其次,從政策工具視角和產(chǎn)業(yè)活動(dòng)類(lèi)型視角,考察中美兩國(guó)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新政策在政策工具類(lèi)型的選擇和不同產(chǎn)業(yè)活動(dòng)階段創(chuàng)新政策的選擇的差異;然后,從四個(gè)方面對(duì)中美高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)政策進(jìn)行評(píng)析,即高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展總體形勢(shì)、產(chǎn)業(yè)布局、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與產(chǎn)業(yè)組織,研究中美高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新政策的實(shí)踐效果并探析存在的差距;最后,將美國(guó)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新政策的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)行總結(jié)歸納,并給出相關(guān)的政策建議,為我國(guó)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展提供借鑒。
[Abstract]:Since eighteen, innovation driven development strategy has become the national strategic transformation of China's economic development. Innovation is particularly important in the high-tech industry activities. With the rapid development of high-tech industries, the international community is generally regarded as the international competitiveness of a country to measure the size of the standard scale. Therefore, all countries will give priority to the development of high-tech industry as a necessary act of government, the government has become more institutionalized, it can be said that the government policy to a great extent on the development of high-tech industry played an important role. The research on innovation policy of high-tech industry, especially in-depth study of transnational policy, explore the relationship between his country innovation policy and the development of high-tech industry, research how to design and development is conducive to the development of China's high-tech industry innovation policy has become more Researchers in recent years, the focus of research. The innovation policy is innovation and promoting the development of countries or regions is a combination of policies, including financial, tax, legal, financial and other complex policy system of various policies, is in this system, each policy is not isolated, the policies have mutual influence and role. In order to exert synergistic effect between policies, its main function is to create a national innovation environment, stimulate innovation and innovation ability of the participants, protection of innovation, and ultimately achieve innovation driven development. The innovation of hi-tech industry policies, which focus on promoting the innovation of high-tech industries mainly published by the government including finance, tax, legal, policy system policy the financial policy tool. As a bridge between innovation policy and policy objectives plays a connecting role, so the interaction between the innovation of policy tools To explain the relationship between research and innovation policy good. Through the comparison between Sino US high-tech industry development in different stages, collect and classify the text. Firstly, the main innovation policy, formulate and implement innovation policy as the starting point, the coordination and policy type and content to explore the similarities and differences of the operating mechanism of high-tech industry the two China innovation policy. Secondly, from the perspective of policy tools and industrial activity type perspective, a comparative study of Sino US high-tech industry innovation policy in different types of policy tools selection and industrial activity stage innovation policy choice; then, from the analysis of Sino US high-tech industry policies in four aspects, namely high-tech industry the development of the overall situation, industrial layout, industrial structure and industrial organization, innovation policy research on Sino US high-tech industrial practice and effect analysis Finally, the successful experience of the US high-tech industry innovation policy is summarized, and relevant policy recommendations are provided, which can provide a reference for the development of high-tech industry in China.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：電子科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F276.44

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊俊杰;易曉芹;;中美高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新政策比較分析[J];商;2016年03期

2 藺潔;陳凱華;秦海波;侯沁江;;中美地方政府創(chuàng)新政策比較研究——以中國(guó)江蘇省和美國(guó)加州為例[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2015年07期

3 李昂;;創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)——經(jīng)濟(jì)新常態(tài)下安徽高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展[J];市場(chǎng)論壇;2015年07期

4 李劉艷;;美日高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展政策比較及啟示[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年04期

5 易春;趙煜明;;主要國(guó)家科技管理組織體系對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示及借鑒[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2013年08期

6 范柏乃;段忠賢;江蕾;;創(chuàng)新政策研究述評(píng)與展望[J];軟科學(xué);2012年11期

7 張永安;李晨光;;創(chuàng)新科技政策及其三階段周期研究[J];科學(xué)學(xué)與科學(xué)技術(shù)管理;2012年04期

8 胡赤弟;蔡簡(jiǎn)建;;高新技術(shù)企業(yè)產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作的利益相關(guān)者實(shí)證分析[J];寧波大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2011年03期

9 汪濤;張杰;安萱;;高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)化政策的歷史演進(jìn)及協(xié)調(diào)狀況研究[J];科技和產(chǎn)業(yè);2011年02期

10 陳柏福;;我國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變動(dòng)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)周期波動(dòng)影響的實(shí)證分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2010年12期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 馬欣員;美國(guó)科技政策及效應(yīng)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2014年

2 高天輝;高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展中的政府支持模式研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2013年

3 鄭代良;改革開(kāi)放以來(lái)中國(guó)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)政策研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2011年

4 黃海明;我國(guó)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展政策研究[D];中共中央黨校;2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 李潔然;中小企業(yè)創(chuàng)新政策協(xié)同作用的機(jī)理分析及績(jī)效研究[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2014年

2 常曉然;我國(guó)流通產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新政策協(xié)同研究[D];浙江工商大學(xué);2014年

3 侯羽;基于文本研究的廣州市智慧產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展政策分析[D];華南理工大學(xué);2013年

4 周文斌;創(chuàng)新政策的多國(guó)比較與中國(guó)創(chuàng)新政策的發(fā)展[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

5 趙麗莉;政策工具視角的中國(guó)光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)政策文本內(nèi)容分析[D];浙江大學(xué);2011年

6 武超;我國(guó)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)業(yè)政策評(píng)估[D];西南交通大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1559303