本文關(guān)鍵詞：中美產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)服務(wù)貿(mào)易指數(shù)及其影響因素分析　出處：《廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 服務(wù)貿(mào)易 產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易 中美

【摘要】：在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的大浪潮下,服務(wù)貿(mào)易已成長(zhǎng)為一股不可忽視的力量,當(dāng)前國(guó)際市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的主戰(zhàn)場(chǎng)已經(jīng)逐步轉(zhuǎn)向服務(wù)貿(mào)易,在全球貿(mào)易總量中的比例不斷加大。各國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)和服務(wù)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整的重點(diǎn)已經(jīng)轉(zhuǎn)移到服務(wù)行業(yè),同時(shí)服務(wù)貿(mào)易競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力已經(jīng)上升到衡量國(guó)家競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的水平。因此,中國(guó)要從“中國(guó)制造”到“中國(guó)服務(wù)”,從經(jīng)濟(jì)大國(guó)成為經(jīng)濟(jì)強(qiáng)國(guó),必須緊跟世界發(fā)展的腳步,從制造經(jīng)濟(jì)變?yōu)榉⻊?wù)經(jīng)濟(jì)。而美國(guó)作為世界上經(jīng)濟(jì)最發(fā)達(dá),服務(wù)貿(mào)易最領(lǐng)先的國(guó)家,其服務(wù)貿(mào)易的發(fā)展經(jīng)驗(yàn)有許多值得我們學(xué)習(xí)的地方。同時(shí),隨著國(guó)際分工的不斷深化,服務(wù)貿(mào)易也從產(chǎn)業(yè)間貿(mào)易向產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易轉(zhuǎn)變,分析比較中美兩國(guó)雙邊產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)服務(wù)貿(mào)易水平及其影響因素,也對(duì)提升中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力,有著重要的意義和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本文首先對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)服務(wù)貿(mào)易相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行了綜述,并闡述了與服務(wù)貿(mào)易有關(guān)的基本概念和理論。第二部分是對(duì)中美服務(wù)貿(mào)易的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析,從整體發(fā)展和分部門(mén)兩個(gè)角度對(duì)服務(wù)貿(mào)易進(jìn)行比較。第三部分是對(duì)中美服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易水平進(jìn)行分析,本文運(yùn)用整體及各行業(yè)靜態(tài)的產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易G-L指數(shù)、動(dòng)態(tài)的遍及產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易MIIT指數(shù),以及服務(wù)業(yè)的水平型HIIT指數(shù)和垂直型VIIT指數(shù)進(jìn)行分析,結(jié)果表明總體上產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)水平較高,但分部門(mén)之間不均衡。第四部分是實(shí)證分析產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易的影響因素,分析結(jié)果表明,對(duì)外開(kāi)放程度、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)差異、貨物密集度與中國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)服務(wù)貿(mào)易水平呈正相關(guān)關(guān)系,匯率則與中國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)服務(wù)貿(mào)易水平呈負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系,而人均收入水平差異和外商直接投資沒(méi)有通過(guò)顯著性水平檢驗(yàn)。第五部分是結(jié)論與建議。本章首先對(duì)本文的主要結(jié)論進(jìn)行總結(jié),然后提出了相關(guān)政策建議,最后簡(jiǎn)單闡述了文章的主要不足與未來(lái)研究展望。
[Abstract]:In the great tide of economic globalization, service trade has grown into a force that can not be ignored. At present, the main battlefield of international market competition has gradually turned to service trade. The emphasis of the adjustment of industrial and service structure has been shifted to the service industry, while the competitiveness of trade in services has risen to the level of measuring national competitiveness. If China wants to go from "made in China" to "service in China" and become an economic power from a big economic power, it must keep pace with the development of the world and change from a manufacturing economy to a service economy, while the United States is the most developed economy in the world. The development experience of service trade in the most advanced countries has much to learn. At the same time, with the deepening of international division of labor, service trade has also changed from inter-industry trade to intra-industry trade. The analysis and comparison of the level of intra-industry service trade between China and the United States and its influencing factors will also enhance the international competitiveness of China's service industry. It is of great significance and practical significance. Firstly, this paper summarizes the related literature on intra-industry trade in services. The second part is to analyze the current situation of service trade between China and the United States. The third part is to analyze the level of intra-industry trade in services between China and the United States. This paper uses the static intra-industry trade G-L index of the whole and various industries. The dynamic intra-industry trade MIIT index, as well as the horizontal HIIT index and vertical VIIT index of the service industry are analyzed. The results show that the overall intra-industry level is relatively high. But the imbalance between subsectors. 4th is the empirical analysis of intra-industry trade factors, the results show that the degree of opening to the outside world, industrial structure differences. The goods intensity has a positive correlation with the level of intra-industry service trade in China, while the exchange rate has a negative correlation with the level of intra-industry service trade in China. The difference in per capita income and foreign direct investment have not passed the significant level test. 5th is the conclusions and recommendations. This chapter first summarizes the main conclusions of this paper, and then puts forward the relevant policy recommendations. In the end, the main deficiency and future research prospect of the article are briefly described.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F752.68;F757.12

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔡宏波;;服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易研究:中國(guó)和東盟國(guó)家的比較[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年07期

2 尚濤;;我國(guó)創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)國(guó)際貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力演進(jìn)分析[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年08期

3 孫莉莉;張曙霄;;中韓雙邊服務(wù)貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)研究[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年05期

4 丁平;徐松;;中印服務(wù)貿(mào)易國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力比較研究[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2007年08期

5 殷鳳;陳憲;;國(guó)際服務(wù)貿(mào)易影響因素與我國(guó)服務(wù)貿(mào)易國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力研究[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2009年02期

6 王恕立;胡宗彪;;我國(guó)服務(wù)貿(mào)易與服務(wù)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)協(xié)同發(fā)展的實(shí)證研究:1985-2006[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2009年04期

7 陳雙喜;王磊;;中日服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易實(shí)證研究[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2010年08期

8 唐海燕;蒙英華;;服務(wù)貿(mào)易能平緩經(jīng)濟(jì)沖擊嗎——基于美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)波動(dòng)跨國(guó)傳導(dǎo)的研究[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2010年12期

9 王恕立;劉軍;;外商直接投資與服務(wù)貿(mào)易國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力——來(lái)自77個(gè)國(guó)家的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2011年03期

10 陳巧慧;戴慶玲;;中國(guó)與日韓服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)貿(mào)易水平分析[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2014年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1358305