【摘要】：文章通過對我國31個省份1999—2015年的面板數(shù)據(jù),在考慮地區(qū)差異性條件下,分析資本有效稅負(fù)、消費有效稅負(fù)和勞動有效稅負(fù)對經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的影響。研究結(jié)果表明,前兩種有效稅負(fù)地區(qū)差異不明顯,降低資本有效稅負(fù),提高消費有效稅負(fù)均對經(jīng)濟(jì)增長具有積極作用;勞動稅負(fù)對經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的影響存在明顯地區(qū)差異性,其中對中部地區(qū)的影響為正,而對東部和西部地區(qū)的影響為負(fù)。經(jīng)濟(jì)開放程度和基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施水平對經(jīng)濟(jì)增長也具有明顯的地區(qū)差異性。
[Abstract]:Based on the panel data from 1999 to 2015 in 31 provinces of China, this paper analyzes the impact of capital effective tax burden, consumption effective tax burden and labor effective tax burden on economic growth under the consideration of regional differences. The results show that there is no obvious difference between the former two kinds of effective tax burden. Reducing the effective tax burden of capital and raising the effective tax burden of consumption have positive effects on the economic growth. The influence of labor tax burden on economic growth has obvious regional differences, in which the impact on the central region is positive, and on the eastern and western regions is negative. The degree of economic opening and the level of infrastructure also have obvious regional differences on economic growth.
【作者單位】： 天津財經(jīng)大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金資助項目(16BJL031)
【分類號】：F124.1;F224;F812.42

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;不能增加就業(yè)的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長沒有價值[J];中國改革;2000年05期

2 ;經(jīng)濟(jì)增長不自動導(dǎo)致最大化就業(yè)[J];政工研究動態(tài);2003年20期

3 宣文;為什么經(jīng)濟(jì)增長沒有帶來顯性就業(yè)?[J];電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社科版);2004年04期

4 王少國;我國經(jīng)濟(jì)增長不能有效拉動城鎮(zhèn)就業(yè)的原因分析[J];環(huán)渤海經(jīng)濟(jì)w，

本文編號：2335762