【摘要】：自從1998年我國房地產(chǎn)市場改革以來,房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)成為國民經(jīng)濟增長點,隨著經(jīng)濟發(fā)展和社會進步,一線城市以及部分“新一線”城市房地產(chǎn)價格迅猛上漲,東西部地區(qū)差異明顯,市場出現(xiàn)調(diào)節(jié)失靈的現(xiàn)象,我國房地產(chǎn)市場格局混亂�，F(xiàn)如今國家需要出臺強有力的政策措施來整治房地產(chǎn)市場非理性房價,使房地產(chǎn)市場回歸理性,健康穩(wěn)定有序的發(fā)展。2011年1月28日,國務(wù)院決定把上海和重慶作為開征房產(chǎn)稅的試點,全國人民對開征房產(chǎn)稅政策寄予厚望�；谝陨媳尘�,本文首先通過對我國房產(chǎn)稅歷年政策回顧,重點闡述房產(chǎn)稅試點改革內(nèi)容及成效對比分析,并通過與國外發(fā)達國家房地產(chǎn)制度作對比,根據(jù)我國基本國情,借鑒相關(guān)制度經(jīng)驗;然后根據(jù)房產(chǎn)稅和房地產(chǎn)市場相關(guān)理論基礎(chǔ),對開征房產(chǎn)稅對我國住宅商品房價格傳導(dǎo)機制和理論分析進行詳細闡述;在此基礎(chǔ)上選取我國35個大中城市的數(shù)據(jù)運用雙重差分模型進行實證分析,剔除其他政策效應(yīng)的影響,使用GMM方法進行檢驗開征房產(chǎn)稅政策對我國住宅商品房價格是否有抑制作用以及居民對政策是否形成政策預(yù)期效應(yīng);最終得出結(jié)論居民對開征房產(chǎn)稅并沒有形成預(yù)期效應(yīng),根據(jù)實證結(jié)果演示,開征房產(chǎn)稅的政策預(yù)期效應(yīng)交互項系數(shù)為(-0.0664)為負,但是不顯著,說明開征房產(chǎn)稅對我國住宅商品房價格影響有限,結(jié)合現(xiàn)狀分析當(dāng)中與其他城市之間的對比分析,可以得出短期內(nèi)開征房產(chǎn)稅對我國住宅商品房價格有一定的抑制作用但是長期效果不明顯,同時從房地產(chǎn)市場需求、房地產(chǎn)市場供給和政策實施過程三個角度分析了原因,最后結(jié)合我國的基本國情提出了相應(yīng)的政策建議。
[Abstract]:Since the reform of China's real estate market in 1998, the real estate industry has become a growth point of the national economy. With economic development and social progress, the real estate prices of first-tier cities and some "new first-tier" cities have risen rapidly. The difference between the east and the west is obvious, the market is out of order, and the real estate market pattern in our country is chaotic. Nowadays, the country needs to introduce strong policies and measures to regulate the irrational housing prices in the real estate market, so that the real estate market can return to rationality and develop healthily, steadily and orderly. January 28, 2011, The State Council decided to set Shanghai and Chongqing as the pilot of levying property tax, and people all over the country have high hopes for the property tax. Based on the above background, this paper first through the review of China's property tax policy, focusing on the content and effectiveness of the property tax pilot reform comparative analysis, and by comparing with developed countries real estate system, according to the basic conditions of our country, Then, according to the theoretical basis of real estate tax and real estate market, the transmission mechanism and theoretical analysis of the real estate tax on the price of our country's commercial housing are elaborated in detail. On this basis, the data of 35 large and medium-sized cities in China are selected for empirical analysis by using the double difference model, and the influence of other policy effects is eliminated. Using the method of GMM to test whether the policy of levying real estate tax has a restraining effect on the price of commercial housing in our country and whether the residents have the expected effect on the policy, and finally comes to the conclusion that the residents do not have the expected effect on the levying of real estate tax. According to the empirical results, the interaction coefficient of policy expectation effect of levying real estate tax is negative (-0.0664), but not significant, which indicates that the effect of levying real estate tax on the price of commercial housing in China is limited. In combination with the comparative analysis between the current situation analysis and other cities, it can be concluded that the introduction of real estate tax in the short term has a certain restraining effect on the prices of commercial housing in our country, but the long-term effect is not obvious. At the same time, from the demand of the real estate market, This paper analyzes the reasons of the supply of real estate market and the process of policy implementation, and finally puts forward corresponding policy suggestions according to the basic conditions of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F812.42;F299.23

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郝玉彬;房產(chǎn)稅申報不實亟待改進[J];稅收與企業(yè);2000年05期

2 于永進,孫景仁,曲繼成;房產(chǎn)稅征管漏洞多[J];山東稅務(wù)縱橫;2000年12期

3 ;我們該不該再次繳納房產(chǎn)稅?[J];稅收與社會;2000年02期

4 任壽根;論中國房產(chǎn)稅制度非均衡[J];現(xiàn)代管理科學(xué);2001年03期

5 林國喜;車間閑置房產(chǎn)應(yīng)繳房產(chǎn)稅[J];福建稅務(wù);2003年03期

6 張其惠;征收房產(chǎn)稅中的誤區(qū)[J];中國鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)企業(yè)會計;2003年02期

7 魏艷華 ,水英;細說房產(chǎn)稅[J];市場研究;2003年12期

8 ;長期閑置未用倉庫需要繳納房產(chǎn)稅嗎?[J];涉外稅務(wù);2004年06期

9 ;農(nóng)民自蓋的房屋需要繳納房產(chǎn)稅嗎?[J];農(nóng)民致富之友;2005年05期

10 唐杰;;征收房產(chǎn)稅對房價的影響[J];技術(shù)與市場;2006年01期

相關(guān)會議論文 前6條

1 吉林;;房產(chǎn)稅熱下的冷思考[A];吉林省土木建筑學(xué)會2013年學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集[C];2013年

2 周元立;黎俊;;淺析應(yīng)用批量技術(shù)進行房產(chǎn)稅評估所面臨的困難及對策[A];中國房地產(chǎn)估價師與房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)人學(xué)會2011年年會論文集[C];2011年

3 姚海放;;宏觀調(diào)控抑或稅收法治:論房產(chǎn)稅改革的目標(biāo)[A];全面小康：發(fā)展與公平——第六屆北京市中青年社科理論人才“百人工程”學(xué)者論壇（2012）論文集[C];2012年

4 米旭明;;評估命中率、公平性與房產(chǎn)稅稅基批量評估模型研究[A];2011廣東社會科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會——地方政府職能與社會公共管理論文集[C];2011年

5 姚海放;;宏觀調(diào)控抑或稅收法治:論房產(chǎn)稅改革的目標(biāo)[A];全面小康：發(fā)展與公平——第六屆北京中青年社科理論人才“百人工程”學(xué)者論壇文集[C];2012年

6 傅光明;;中外財產(chǎn)稅制的比較研究與制度設(shè)計[A];中國制度經(jīng)濟學(xué)年會論文集[C];2006年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 張彩霞;房產(chǎn)稅征收難在哪里　[N];中國稅務(wù)報;2005年

2 本報記者 孫繼斌;學(xué)者建言我國應(yīng)緩征或不征房產(chǎn)稅[N];法制日報;2008年

3 本報記者 陳雪芹;開征房產(chǎn)稅有望終結(jié)“炒房時代”[N];中國改革報;2010年

4 本報記者 朱宇　丁冰 周文天 林U，

本文編號：2258549