發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-11 16:18

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)戰(zhàn)略的模糊博弈建模與分析　出處：《五邑大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)戰(zhàn)略 模糊博弈 市場(chǎng)容量 古諾模型 伯川德悖論

【摘要】：當(dāng)今時(shí)代消費(fèi)者受到信息和技術(shù)不斷更新和發(fā)展的影響,生活需求變得復(fù)雜、不穩(wěn)定和多元化;另一方面,企業(yè)同樣受到來(lái)自消費(fèi)者和競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手反應(yīng)的影響,因此所做的戰(zhàn)略決策實(shí)際上是在模糊的市場(chǎng)環(huán)境下進(jìn)行的。本研究基于模糊數(shù)學(xué)、博弈論和企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)戰(zhàn)略決策理論,對(duì)市場(chǎng)容量進(jìn)行模糊化,構(gòu)建模糊博弈模型,并在此基礎(chǔ)上分析企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)戰(zhàn)略決策現(xiàn)象,為企業(yè)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)提供相關(guān)解釋和啟示。第一,構(gòu)建了區(qū)間相同的模糊市場(chǎng)容量古諾模型,重點(diǎn)分析企業(yè)超額利潤(rùn)獲得。通過(guò)建立模糊市場(chǎng)容量估計(jì)函數(shù),企業(yè)可以根據(jù)自身的樂(lè)觀程度在相同的模糊市場(chǎng)容量區(qū)間內(nèi)估計(jì)模糊市場(chǎng)容量,并以有限理性進(jìn)行產(chǎn)量決策。從模型方面看,該模型擴(kuò)展了經(jīng)典古諾模型的均衡數(shù)量,經(jīng)典古諾均衡成為它的特例;從實(shí)際產(chǎn)量競(jìng)爭(zhēng)決策方面看,企業(yè)獲得超額利潤(rùn)需要比競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手更樂(lè)觀的市場(chǎng)容量估計(jì),在這種情形下企業(yè)對(duì)自己的產(chǎn)品更有自信。第二,構(gòu)建了區(qū)間差異的模糊市場(chǎng)容量古諾模型,重點(diǎn)分析企業(yè)市場(chǎng)進(jìn)入退出策略和市場(chǎng)定位。該模型改進(jìn)了第一個(gè)模型,假設(shè)企業(yè)對(duì)模糊市場(chǎng)容量區(qū)間的估計(jì)存在差異性,企業(yè)進(jìn)行估計(jì)和決策前需要首先通過(guò)模糊市場(chǎng)容量區(qū)間估計(jì)函數(shù)確定好各自的市場(chǎng)容量區(qū)間,分析模糊市場(chǎng)容量反應(yīng)函數(shù)發(fā)現(xiàn),潛在進(jìn)入者需要在進(jìn)入前調(diào)查清楚在位企業(yè)的實(shí)力和模糊市場(chǎng)容量的匹配程度;處于產(chǎn)量劣勢(shì)的追隨者需要緊跟市場(chǎng)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者的步伐,注重產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量;企業(yè)需要堅(jiān)持產(chǎn)品創(chuàng)新,擴(kuò)大市場(chǎng)容量。第三,構(gòu)建了模糊市場(chǎng)容量伯川德模型,從模糊市場(chǎng)容量的角度對(duì)伯川德悖論給出新的解釋。通過(guò)分析模糊市場(chǎng)容量條件下企業(yè)進(jìn)行價(jià)格戰(zhàn)的過(guò)程以及模糊市場(chǎng)容量伯川德均衡,發(fā)現(xiàn)企業(yè)基于模糊市場(chǎng)容量的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)價(jià)格要高于邊際成本且具有不相同的正利潤(rùn)。因此從模糊市場(chǎng)容量的角度對(duì)伯川德悖論和價(jià)格戰(zhàn)進(jìn)行新的解釋。并為防止企業(yè)過(guò)度競(jìng)爭(zhēng)給出了相關(guān)解釋和啟示。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, consumers are affected by the continuous updating and development of information and technology, and the needs of life become complex, unstable and diversified. On the other hand, firms are also affected by reactions from consumers and competitors, so strategic decisions are actually made in a fuzzy market environment. This study is based on fuzzy mathematics. On the basis of game theory and enterprise competitive strategic decision theory, the market capacity is fuzzy and the fuzzy game model is constructed, and on this basis, the phenomenon of enterprise competitive strategic decision is analyzed. To provide relevant explanations and revelations for the enterprise market competition. First, the paper constructs a Cournot model of fuzzy market capacity with the same interval, focuses on the analysis of the excess profits of enterprises. Through the establishment of fuzzy market capacity estimation function. Enterprises can estimate fuzzy market capacity in the same range of fuzzy market capacity according to their own optimistic degree, and make output decision with limited rationality. This model extends the equilibrium quantity of classical Cournot model, and the classical Cournot equilibrium becomes its special case. From the point of view of actual production competition decision, enterprises need more optimistic market capacity estimation than competitors to obtain excess profits. In this case, enterprises have more confidence in their own products. Second. In this paper, a fuzzy market capacity model with interval difference is constructed, which focuses on the analysis of market entry and exit strategy and market positioning. The model improves the first model. Assuming that there is a difference in the estimation of the fuzzy market capacity interval, enterprises need to determine their market capacity interval through the fuzzy market capacity interval estimation function before making the estimation and decision-making. By analyzing the response function of fuzzy market capacity, it is found that the potential entrant needs to investigate clearly the matching degree between the strength of the incumbent enterprise and the fuzzy market capacity before entering. Followers at a productivity disadvantage need to keep pace with market leaders and focus on product quality; Enterprises need to adhere to product innovation and expand market capacity. Thirdly, a fuzzy market capacity Bertrand model is constructed. This paper gives a new explanation to Bertrand's paradox from the point of view of fuzzy market capacity. By analyzing the process of price war under the condition of fuzzy market capacity and the Bertrand equilibrium of fuzzy market capacity. It is found that the competitive price based on the fuzzy market capacity is higher than the marginal cost and has different positive profits. Therefore, this paper gives a new explanation of Bertrand's paradox and price war from the angle of fuzzy market capacity. Excessive competition gives the relevant explanation and enlightenment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：五邑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F224.32;F272

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖浩芳;劉霈霈;黃康喬;楊桂玨;;基于古諾模型的移動(dòng)數(shù)據(jù)(手機(jī)流量)定價(jià)策略分析[J];科技視界;2016年14期

2 董華平;干杏娣;;我國(guó)貨幣政策銀行貸款渠道傳導(dǎo)效率研究——基于銀行業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的古諾模型[J];金融研究;2015年10期

3 劉兆讀;;二級(jí)供應(yīng)鏈中模糊古諾競(jìng)爭(zhēng)零售模型及應(yīng)用[J];商;2015年09期

4 周高儀;趙曉冬;郭菊花;陸靜;;房地產(chǎn)開(kāi)發(fā)項(xiàng)目的直覺(jué)模糊矩陣博弈分析[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2014年09期

5 吳險(xiǎn);;伯川德模型概述[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2012年19期

6 孟令鵬;韓傳峰;王劍敏;;生產(chǎn)能力限制下價(jià)格Stackelberg博弈模型[J];中國(guó)管理科學(xué);2012年01期

7 張贊;凌超;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)零售商與實(shí)體零售商的價(jià)格競(jìng)爭(zhēng)及其對(duì)市場(chǎng)績(jī)效的影響研究[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年06期

8 鄒杰;何衛(wèi);;非合作博弈模型的模糊構(gòu)建與應(yīng)用[J];重慶教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年06期

9 張倩;陳誠(chéng);程玲華;;基于帶模糊信息的兩人一般和有限可信性博弈[J];合肥學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2008年03期

10 楊緯隆;林健;;基于博弈論的企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略管理研究[J];科學(xué)學(xué)與科學(xué)技術(shù)管理;2007年08期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 馬麗云;;基于模糊思想的不完全信息動(dòng)態(tài)博弈解法[A];2007中國(guó)控制與決策學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王洪武;基于非線性理論的古諾—伯川德混合模型研究及應(yīng)用[D];天津大學(xué);2013年

2 王昭;具有模糊支付的博弈問(wèn)題及其應(yīng)用研究[D];北京理工大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 潘杏早;基于消費(fèi)者庫(kù)存的寡頭產(chǎn)量競(jìng)爭(zhēng)策略研究[D];武漢科技大學(xué);2012年

2 張素婷;重復(fù)模糊合作對(duì)策解的研究[D];燕山大學(xué);2009年

3 陳蓉;博弈論均衡理論在價(jià)格競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中的應(yīng)用分析[D];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)（北京）;2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1410279