發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-25 07:12

  本文選題：任課教師　切入點(diǎn)：勝任力　出處：《南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：高職教育在我國(guó)高等教育中占據(jù)重要地位,搞好�？圃盒５慕逃ぷ鲗�(duì)我國(guó)高等教育的發(fā)展具有積極的意義。因此高職類(含傳統(tǒng)意義上的大專院校)院校任課教師教學(xué)責(zé)任重大,其能否勝任相應(yīng)的教學(xué)要求對(duì)我國(guó)�？平逃�、乃至整個(gè)高等教育意義重大。對(duì)高職類院校管理者而言必須能夠有效衡量高職院校任課教師的能力,即弄清什么樣的教師才是優(yōu)秀的教師。這是科學(xué)合理管理專科院校師資資源的前提條件,為此,本文試圖構(gòu)建一套合理有效的針對(duì)高職院校任課教師的教學(xué)勝任力評(píng)價(jià)體系。 本文在學(xué)習(xí)借鑒已有研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上,根據(jù)冰山理論,結(jié)合詢9位專家的意見以及本人對(duì)高職院校任課教師的理解,從顯在和潛在兩個(gè)方面構(gòu)建了高職院校任課教師勝任力指標(biāo)體系,共包括顯在和潛在勝任力2個(gè)一級(jí)指標(biāo)。其中前者包括知識(shí)、能力和基本信息等3個(gè)二級(jí)指標(biāo),13個(gè)三級(jí)指標(biāo)；后者包括動(dòng)機(jī)、態(tài)度/價(jià)值觀和自我形象等3個(gè)二級(jí)指標(biāo),10個(gè)三級(jí)指標(biāo),量表中共包含35個(gè)問(wèn)題。 采用層次分析法,結(jié)合專家打分法,分別計(jì)算了各指標(biāo)的組內(nèi)權(quán)重和對(duì)總目標(biāo)的權(quán)重。打分和運(yùn)算結(jié)果顯示,顯在勝任力和潛在勝任力對(duì)總目標(biāo)的權(quán)重相等,均為0.500；顯在勝任力中,基本信息、能力和知識(shí)三個(gè)變量對(duì)顯在勝任力貢獻(xiàn)的權(quán)重向量為(0.1309,0.4346,0.4346)；潛在勝任力中,態(tài)度/價(jià)值觀、自我形象、動(dòng)機(jī)對(duì)潛在勝任力貢獻(xiàn)的權(quán)重向量為(0.3586,0.1410,0.5004)。各3級(jí)指標(biāo)對(duì)總目標(biāo)的貢獻(xiàn)排名前5位的分別是職業(yè)規(guī)劃(0.1616)、工作目的(0.0886)、教學(xué)理念(0.0831)、職業(yè)道德和奉獻(xiàn)精神(0.0727)和語(yǔ)言表達(dá)能力(0.0682),排名前5位的指標(biāo)對(duì)總目標(biāo)的權(quán)重占47.42%。 以江蘇經(jīng)貿(mào)學(xué)院部分?jǐn)?shù)據(jù)為例,以本文所建立的高職院校任課教師勝任力評(píng)價(jià)模型為基礎(chǔ),分別測(cè)算了樣本數(shù)據(jù)的綜合勝任力、顯在和潛在勝任力和6項(xiàng)2級(jí)指標(biāo)勝任力的得分情況,并對(duì)評(píng)價(jià)模型進(jìn)行了進(jìn)一步的小幅修正。根據(jù)勝任力測(cè)算結(jié)果,結(jié)合樣本的績(jī)效衡量結(jié)果,運(yùn)用雙變量相關(guān)分析的方法,證實(shí)了本文所構(gòu)建的勝任力評(píng)價(jià)模型的評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果與樣本的工作績(jī)效之間確實(shí)存在正的相關(guān)關(guān)系,故證實(shí)了本模型的合理性。 最后,在模型合理性得到驗(yàn)證,勝任力評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果可靠性得到認(rèn)可的情況下,根據(jù)之前對(duì)樣本勝任力水平測(cè)量的結(jié)果,采用三等分法,將樣本在各項(xiàng)勝任力上分為了高中低三類。并結(jié)合使用模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法,對(duì)其樣本院校任課教師勝任力總體情況進(jìn)行了評(píng)價(jià)。評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果顯示該院校任課教師顯在勝任力處于較低水平,潛在勝任力處于中等水平,樣本院校任課教師綜合勝任力水平不高。在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了提高高職院校任課教師勝任力水平的對(duì)策和建議。
[Abstract]:Higher vocational education plays an important role in our country's higher education, has the positive significance to the college education of higher education development in China. Therefore, higher vocational colleges (including traditional college) college teachers teaching responsibility, the ability to perform the corresponding teaching requirements of college education in China, and the higher education is of great significance. The ability of higher vocational college administrators must be able to effectively measure the teachers in higher vocational colleges, that is to clarify what kind of teacher is a good teacher. This is a prerequisite, scientific and reasonable management of vocational schools teaching resources for this purpose, this paper tries to construct a reasonable and effective teaching in higher vocational colleges the teachers' teaching competency assessment system.
Based on learning from the existing research results, based on the iceberg theory, combined with the views of 9 experts consultation and my understanding of teachers in higher vocational colleges, the obvious and potential two aspects to construct the competence index system of higher vocational college teachers, including apparent and potential competency index of 2 one class. The former includes knowledge, ability and the basic information of the 3 level two indexes, 13 level three indexes; the latter includes motivation, attitude / values and self image of 3 level two indexes, 10 level three indexes, the scale contains 35 questions.
By using AHP method, combined with expert scoring method, the index weight and the overall goal of the group weights were calculated. And the scoring results showed significantly in competency and potential competency weights is equal to the total target, was 0.500; in the competency, basic information, knowledge and skills three a variable of the weight vector in the competency for contribution (0.1309,0.4346,0.4346); potential competency, attitude / values, self-image, motivation of weight vector potential competency for contribution (0.3586,0.1410,0.5004). The 3 indicators of the overall goal of the contribution of the top 5 are the occupation planning (0.1616) the purpose of work, (0.0886), (0.0831), the concept of teaching occupation moral and dedication (0.0727) and language skills (0.0682), the weight of the top 5 index to the total target accounted for 47.42%.
The Jiangsu Institute of economic data as an example, to the establishment of Vocational College Teachers' competency evaluation model based on measured comprehensive competency of sample data, apparent and potential competency and 6 scores of 2 indicators of competency, and the evaluation model were slightly modified further. According to the competency measurement results, combined with the sample performance measurement results, using the method of correlation analysis, confirmed the existence of relationship is between the competency evaluation model of this paper, the evaluation results and sample performance, so that the rationality of the model.
Finally, the rationality of the model is verified, the competency evaluation results of reliability of approval, according to the sample before the competency level of the measurement results, the three division method, the sample in the competency in low high school three classes. Combined with the use of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, the sample of College Teachers competencyhas were evaluated. The evaluation result showed that the college teachers' competency in at a relatively low level, potential competency in the middle level, teachers colleges comprehensive sample competency level is not high. On this basis, put forward to improve the Vocational College Teachers' competency level of countermeasures and suggestions.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：G715.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高田欽;基于勝任力的高校教師評(píng)價(jià)探究[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

2 陳江;林日鵬;吳能全;;勝任力模型開發(fā)新法初探[J];中國(guó)人才;2009年13期

3 李明斐,盧小君;勝任力與勝任力模型構(gòu)建方法研究[J];大連理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年01期

4 周斌;陳麗金;;高職院校專業(yè)課教師勝任力培養(yǎng)策略分析[J];大眾科技;2010年09期

5 劉世勇;陳莎;;高校輔導(dǎo)員勝任力模型的構(gòu)建與檢驗(yàn)[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年03期

6 王玉芬;;關(guān)于教師勝任力的兩種不同觀點(diǎn)的分析[J];呼倫貝爾學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

7 劉葉云;李雪;;我國(guó)高校教師勝任力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建[J];湖南師范大學(xué)教育科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

8 劉欽瑤;葛列眾;劉少英;;教師勝任力研究述評(píng)[J];高等工程教育研究;2007年01期

9 涂云海;;高職院校專業(yè)課教師勝任力與績(jī)效的關(guān)系[J];黑龍江高教研究;2010年09期

10 馮君瑩;;高校教師勝任力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系研究[J];合作經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2009年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1662066