【摘要】： 隨著科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展和社會(huì)的不斷進(jìn)步,我國(guó)在政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化、軍事等各個(gè)方面對(duì)人才的需求日益迫切。為了能在世界民族之林中立于不敗之地,各國(guó)紛紛加快了對(duì)高層次人才的培養(yǎng)與儲(chǔ)備工作,對(duì)人才的培養(yǎng)觀(guān)念也逐步從以往的單一型高級(jí)專(zhuān)門(mén)人才向具備較高綜合素質(zhì)的復(fù)合型人才轉(zhuǎn)變。高校是人才成長(zhǎng)的基地,承擔(dān)著為祖國(guó)的現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)貢獻(xiàn)人才的重要任務(wù)。隨著素質(zhì)教育的推廣,高校對(duì)研究生的培養(yǎng)方式產(chǎn)生了很大改變,已不再單純注重其學(xué)習(xí)成績(jī),而是更傾向于對(duì)其創(chuàng)新能力、實(shí)踐能力以及身心素質(zhì)等方面的培養(yǎng)。為了更好地指導(dǎo)高校教學(xué)工作,提高研究生的自身素質(zhì),促進(jìn)研究生與用人單位的“雙向選擇”,及時(shí)交互反饋信息,我們需要從素質(zhì)教育的角度出發(fā),構(gòu)建一套科學(xué)、合理的綜合評(píng)價(jià)體系。 準(zhǔn)確評(píng)價(jià)研究生的綜合素質(zhì),是一個(gè)十分復(fù)雜的問(wèn)題,也是目前教育工作者所面臨的一個(gè)嚴(yán)峻問(wèn)題,關(guān)系到我國(guó)研究生教育事業(yè)的改革和發(fā)展�，F(xiàn)在很多高校的研究生綜合素質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)還不夠科學(xué),主要表現(xiàn)在評(píng)價(jià)內(nèi)容不夠全面、公正性較差、過(guò)于形式化等方面。還有的只是為了迎接檢查,為了單純的評(píng)價(jià)而評(píng)價(jià),沒(méi)有真正領(lǐng)會(huì)到教育評(píng)價(jià)的內(nèi)涵和意義。由于評(píng)價(jià)涉及的內(nèi)容較多,不僅有定性因素,而且有定量因素,要想得到準(zhǔn)確客觀(guān)的評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果,需要建立科學(xué)全面的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)數(shù)學(xué)模型,并結(jié)合多種評(píng)價(jià)方法進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的計(jì)算。本文針對(duì)研究生的培養(yǎng)目標(biāo)和特點(diǎn),對(duì)研究生的綜合評(píng)價(jià)進(jìn)行了深入研究,在現(xiàn)有研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上,成功將專(zhuān)家意見(jiàn)法法、層次分析法以及模糊評(píng)價(jià)法相融合,暫且稱(chēng)之為“三元綜合評(píng)價(jià)法”。其基本思想是使用德?tīng)柗品ㄟM(jìn)行調(diào)查研究,在其基礎(chǔ)上使用層次分析法構(gòu)建三層評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,并確定各個(gè)指標(biāo)的權(quán)重,構(gòu)造合理的判斷矩陣,然后采用模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法構(gòu)造模糊矩陣,通過(guò)矩陣合成的方法得到最終綜合素質(zhì)評(píng)分。這里的“三元綜合評(píng)價(jià)法”既看重評(píng)價(jià)對(duì)象的客觀(guān)數(shù)據(jù),又看重評(píng)價(jià)者的主觀(guān)判斷;既看重對(duì)定量因子的計(jì)算,又看重對(duì)定性因子的分析,并貼切地實(shí)現(xiàn)了定性因子向定量因子的轉(zhuǎn)化,提高了研究生綜合素質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)的準(zhǔn)確性與科學(xué)性。 本文按照“三元綜合評(píng)價(jià)法”的思路,依照全面性、準(zhǔn)確性、可行性以及以人為本的原則,構(gòu)建出一套研究生綜合素質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)體系,在一定程度上消除了人的主觀(guān)判斷對(duì)評(píng)價(jià)工作的影響,具有較好的科學(xué)性、合理性與可操作性,為高校研究生綜合素質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)以及學(xué)生工作規(guī)范化管理提供了良好的思路。
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology and the continuous progress of society, the demand for talents in politics, economy, culture, military and so on is becoming more and more urgent in our country. In order to remain invincible in the forest of nations in the world, countries have accelerated the training and reserve of high-level talents. The concept of cultivating talents has gradually changed from a single type of senior specialized personnel to a compound talent with higher comprehensive quality. Colleges and universities are the base of talent growth and undertake the important task of contributing talents to the modernization of the motherland. With the promotion of quality education, colleges and universities have changed a lot of graduate students' training methods, no longer just pay attention to their academic performance, but more inclined to cultivate their innovative ability, practical ability, physical and mental quality and so on. In order to better guide the teaching work in colleges and universities, improve the quality of graduate students, promote the "two-way choice" between graduate students and employers, and interact with each other in time, we need to construct a set of science from the point of view of quality education. A reasonable comprehensive evaluation system. Accurate evaluation of the comprehensive quality of graduate students is a very complex problem, and it is also a serious problem faced by educators at present, which is related to the reform and development of graduate education in our country. At present, the comprehensive quality evaluation system of graduate students in many colleges and universities is not scientific enough, mainly in the aspects of insufficient comprehensive evaluation content, poor fairness, too formalization and so on. There is only to meet the inspection, for the simple evaluation and evaluation, do not really understand the connotation and significance of educational evaluation. Because there are many contents involved in the evaluation, there are not only qualitative factors, but also quantitative factors. In order to obtain accurate and objective evaluation results, it is necessary to establish a scientific and comprehensive mathematical model of the evaluation index, and combined with a variety of evaluation methods to carry out the corresponding calculation. According to the training objectives and characteristics of graduate students, this paper makes a deep study on the comprehensive evaluation of graduate students. On the basis of the existing research results, the expert opinion method, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy evaluation method are successfully integrated. For the time being, it is called "ternary comprehensive evaluation method". The basic idea is to use the Delphi method to investigate and study, on the basis of which the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to construct the three-layer evaluation index system, and the weight of each index is determined, and a reasonable judgment matrix is constructed. Then the fuzzy matrix is constructed by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, and the final comprehensive quality score is obtained by matrix synthesis method. The "ternary comprehensive evaluation method" here attaches importance not only to the objective data of the evaluation object, but also to the subjective judgment of the evaluator. It not only attaches importance to the calculation of quantitative factors, but also to the analysis of qualitative factors, and realizes the transformation from qualitative factors to quantitative factors, which improves the accuracy and scientific nature of the comprehensive quality evaluation of graduate students. According to the train of thought of "ternary comprehensive evaluation method", according to the principle of comprehensiveness, accuracy, feasibility and people-oriented, this paper constructs a set of comprehensive quality evaluation system for graduate students. To a certain extent, it eliminates the influence of human subjective judgment on the evaluation work, which is scientific, reasonable and operable, and provides a good train of thought for the evaluation of the comprehensive quality of graduate students and the standardized management of student work.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G643

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 張厲;;從NOC設(shè)計(jì)大賽看大學(xué)生綜合素質(zhì)培養(yǎng)的重要性[J];才智;2011年30期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王家;理工類(lèi)院校語(yǔ)言專(zhuān)業(yè)學(xué)生綜合素質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)及提升研究[D];華北電力大學(xué);2011年

2 張妍;基于石油企業(yè)人才需求的研究生素質(zhì)模型研究[D];西南石油大學(xué);2012年

3 盛丹;基于素質(zhì)測(cè)評(píng)理論的大學(xué)生就業(yè)能力研究[D];西安石油大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2475186