大學(xué)生抗阻訓(xùn)練能量消耗研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-16 11:37
【摘要】：研究目的:通過測量大學(xué)生不同(力量)負(fù)荷單一動作和組合動作抗阻訓(xùn)練的能量消耗,探討抗阻訓(xùn)練能量消耗的特點(diǎn)及與相關(guān)因素之間的關(guān)系,建立不同(力量)負(fù)荷抗阻訓(xùn)練能耗方程,以便能科學(xué)合理的指導(dǎo)大學(xué)生運(yùn)動健身,為抗阻訓(xùn)練在大學(xué)生群體健康促進(jìn)中的應(yīng)用和運(yùn)動處方制定提供合理活動的推薦量和評價標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。研究方法:采用Cosmed K4b2便攜式心肺測試儀間接測量抗阻訓(xùn)練能量消耗,對22名普通大學(xué)生抗阻訓(xùn)練過程中的能量消耗等相關(guān)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行測量,并根據(jù)體重、體成分等相關(guān)因素,對能量消耗特點(diǎn)及相關(guān)特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行分析。研究結(jié)果:(1)中等(力量)負(fù)荷(12RM)與低(力量)負(fù)荷(25RM)單一動作兩種抗阻訓(xùn)練中啞鈴深蹲的能量消耗均最高,與其他單一動作抗阻訓(xùn)練比較差異具有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0. 01);抗阻訓(xùn)練過程中組間能量消耗存在較大差異,中等(力量)負(fù)荷組在第2組能量消耗達(dá)到最高(P0.01),低(力量)負(fù)荷組在第4組達(dá)到最高(P0.01);中等(力量)負(fù)荷(12RM)與低(力量)負(fù)荷(25RM)單一動作抗阻訓(xùn)練運(yùn)動代謝當(dāng)量分別在4. 01-6. 80 METs和3. 66-6. 98 METs之間。兩種負(fù)荷下單一動作能耗和體重、BMI、去脂體重存在正相關(guān)(R=0. 686、0. 259、0. 865、0. 675、0. 373、0. 844,P0.01或P0.05),能耗與體脂百分比成負(fù)相關(guān)(R=-0. 283、-0.212, P0. 01),總體水平上,心率與能量消耗和相對攝氧量之間存在著線性相關(guān)(R=0. 630、0. 634, P0. 01)。(2)中等(力量)負(fù)荷(12RM)與低(力量)負(fù)荷(25RM)組合動作抗阻訓(xùn)練代謝當(dāng)量分別在6. 53-7. 23 METs和5. 56-6. 24 METs之間,組合動作訓(xùn)練后,機(jī)體代謝水平在相當(dāng)長的時間內(nèi)仍處于較高代謝水平。兩種負(fù)荷組合動作抗阻訓(xùn)練能耗和體重、BMI、去脂體重存在正相關(guān)的線性關(guān)系(R=0. 671、0.451、0.814、0.716、0.443、0.867, P0. 01),能耗與體脂百分比成負(fù)相關(guān)(R=-0. 234、-0.341,P0. 01),總體水平上,心率與能量消耗和相對攝氧量之間存在線性相關(guān)((R=0. 538、0.447、0.732、0. 437, P0. 01)。(3)運(yùn)用相關(guān)及回歸分析分別建立中等(力量)負(fù)荷(12RM)和低(力量)負(fù)荷(25RM)組合動作抗阻訓(xùn)練的能耗方程。中等(力量)負(fù)荷(12RM)組合動作抗阻訓(xùn)練的能耗方程:EEm (12RM) (Kcal/min)=0. 108Weight+0. 043HR-0. 018FFM-4. 802 (R2=0. 712)低(力量)負(fù)荷(25RM)組合動作抗阻訓(xùn)練的能耗方程:EEm (25RM) (Kcal/min)=0. 154FFM+0. 036HR-0. 056Weight-2. 74 (R2=0. 806)研究結(jié)論:1、低(力量)負(fù)荷(25RM)組合動作抗阻訓(xùn)練屬于中等強(qiáng)度體力活動,中等(力量)負(fù)荷(12RM)組合動作抗阻訓(xùn)練屬于大強(qiáng)度體力活動�？棺栌�(xùn)練對運(yùn)動后靜息能量消耗有一定影響。2、抗阻訓(xùn)練過程中,能量消耗受個體的體重、體脂百分比、去脂體重、BMI等因素的影響,尤以去脂體重的影響最高。3、線性回歸方程的建立可以為大學(xué)生日常運(yùn)動健身和抗阻訓(xùn)練提供科學(xué)依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the characteristics of energy expenditure of resistance training and the relationship between energy consumption and related factors by measuring the energy expenditure of single and combined action resistance training for college students. The energy consumption equation of resistance training under different load can be established to guide college students' physical fitness scientifically and reasonably. To provide the recommended amount and evaluation standard of reasonable activities for the application of resistance training in the promotion of college students' group health and the formulation of exercise prescription. Methods: Cosmed K4b2 portable cardiopulmonary tester was used to measure the energy consumption of resistance training in 22 college students. The characteristics of energy consumption and related characteristics are analyzed. The results were as follows: (1) the energy consumption of dumbbell squatting was the highest in the single action resistance training of moderate (strength) load (12RM) and low (strength) load (25RM). The difference was statistically significant compared with other single movement resistance training (P0. There was significant difference in energy consumption between groups during resistance training. The energy consumption of the middle load group reached the highest in the second group (P0.01), and the low load group reached the highest in the fourth group (P0.01), and the energy consumption in the middle load group reached the highest in the second group (P0.01) and the low load group reached the highest level in the fourth group (P0.01). The metabolic equivalent of moderate (strength) load (12RM) and low (strength) load (25RM) single action resistance training was 4. 01-6. 80 METs and 3. 66-6. Between 98 METs. There was a positive correlation between the action energy consumption and the weight of the two loads and the weight of the BMI, degreasing (RV 0. 5%). 686,0. 259,0. 865,0. 675,0. 373,0. The energy consumption was negatively correlated with the percentage of body fat (P 0.01 or P 0.05). 283- 0.212, P0. At the overall level, there was a linear correlation between heart rate and energy consumption and relative oxygen uptake (RP0. 630,0. 634, P0. 01). (2) the metabolic equivalent of resistance training for moderate (strength) load (12RM) and low (strength) load (25RM) was 6. 5% respectively. 53-7. 23 METs and 5. 5. 56-6. Between 24 METs and 24 METs, the metabolic level of the body was still in a high level for a long time after combined movement training. There was a positive linear relationship between energy consumption and body weight in two kinds of load combined action resistance training and BMI, degreasing weight (RP0. 671,0.451,0.814,0.716,0.443,0.867, P0. 01), the energy consumption was negatively correlated with the percentage of body fat (RV-0. 234L -0.341g P0. At the overall level, there was a linear correlation between heart rate and energy consumption and relative oxygen uptake (R0. 0. 538,0.447,0.732,0. 437, P0. 01). (3) using correlation and regression analysis, the energy consumption equations of combined action resistance training with moderate (strength) load (12RM) and low (strength) load (25RM) were established respectively. Medium (strength) load (12RM) combined action resistance training energy consumption equation: EEm (12RM) (Kcal/min) = 0. 108Weight 0. 043HR-0. 018FFM-4. 802 (R2C0. 712) Energy consumption equation: EEm (25RM (Kcal/min) = 0 for low (strength) load (25RM) combined action resistance training. 154FFM 0. 036HR-0. 056 Weight-2. 74 (R2 / 0. 806) the conclusions are as follows: 1. Low (strength) load (25RM) combined action resistance training belongs to medium intensity physical activity, while moderate (12RM) combined action resistance training belongs to high intensity physical activity. Resistance training has a certain effect on resting energy expenditure after exercise. 2. During resistance training, energy consumption is affected by body weight, percentage of body fat, fat-free body weight, BMI and so on. The establishment of linear regression equation can provide scientific basis for daily exercise fitness and resistance training of college students.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G804.49
本文編號：2382268
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the characteristics of energy expenditure of resistance training and the relationship between energy consumption and related factors by measuring the energy expenditure of single and combined action resistance training for college students. The energy consumption equation of resistance training under different load can be established to guide college students' physical fitness scientifically and reasonably. To provide the recommended amount and evaluation standard of reasonable activities for the application of resistance training in the promotion of college students' group health and the formulation of exercise prescription. Methods: Cosmed K4b2 portable cardiopulmonary tester was used to measure the energy consumption of resistance training in 22 college students. The characteristics of energy consumption and related characteristics are analyzed. The results were as follows: (1) the energy consumption of dumbbell squatting was the highest in the single action resistance training of moderate (strength) load (12RM) and low (strength) load (25RM). The difference was statistically significant compared with other single movement resistance training (P0. There was significant difference in energy consumption between groups during resistance training. The energy consumption of the middle load group reached the highest in the second group (P0.01), and the low load group reached the highest in the fourth group (P0.01), and the energy consumption in the middle load group reached the highest in the second group (P0.01) and the low load group reached the highest level in the fourth group (P0.01). The metabolic equivalent of moderate (strength) load (12RM) and low (strength) load (25RM) single action resistance training was 4. 01-6. 80 METs and 3. 66-6. Between 98 METs. There was a positive correlation between the action energy consumption and the weight of the two loads and the weight of the BMI, degreasing (RV 0. 5%). 686,0. 259,0. 865,0. 675,0. 373,0. The energy consumption was negatively correlated with the percentage of body fat (P 0.01 or P 0.05). 283- 0.212, P0. At the overall level, there was a linear correlation between heart rate and energy consumption and relative oxygen uptake (RP0. 630,0. 634, P0. 01). (2) the metabolic equivalent of resistance training for moderate (strength) load (12RM) and low (strength) load (25RM) was 6. 5% respectively. 53-7. 23 METs and 5. 5. 56-6. Between 24 METs and 24 METs, the metabolic level of the body was still in a high level for a long time after combined movement training. There was a positive linear relationship between energy consumption and body weight in two kinds of load combined action resistance training and BMI, degreasing weight (RP0. 671,0.451,0.814,0.716,0.443,0.867, P0. 01), the energy consumption was negatively correlated with the percentage of body fat (RV-0. 234L -0.341g P0. At the overall level, there was a linear correlation between heart rate and energy consumption and relative oxygen uptake (R0. 0. 538,0.447,0.732,0. 437, P0. 01). (3) using correlation and regression analysis, the energy consumption equations of combined action resistance training with moderate (strength) load (12RM) and low (strength) load (25RM) were established respectively. Medium (strength) load (12RM) combined action resistance training energy consumption equation: EEm (12RM) (Kcal/min) = 0. 108Weight 0. 043HR-0. 018FFM-4. 802 (R2C0. 712) Energy consumption equation: EEm (25RM (Kcal/min) = 0 for low (strength) load (25RM) combined action resistance training. 154FFM 0. 036HR-0. 056 Weight-2. 74 (R2 / 0. 806) the conclusions are as follows: 1. Low (strength) load (25RM) combined action resistance training belongs to medium intensity physical activity, while moderate (12RM) combined action resistance training belongs to high intensity physical activity. Resistance training has a certain effect on resting energy expenditure after exercise. 2. During resistance training, energy consumption is affected by body weight, percentage of body fat, fat-free body weight, BMI and so on. The establishment of linear regression equation can provide scientific basis for daily exercise fitness and resistance training of college students.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G804.49
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 徐亮亮;劉欣;李合;武東明;江崇民;;漸進(jìn)力量訓(xùn)練對上肢肌力、體成分及圍度的影響[J];體育科學(xué);2015年10期
2 徐建方;張漓;馮連世;路瑛麗;;不同運(yùn)動方式對肥胖青年身體慢性炎癥狀態(tài)的影響[J];體育科學(xué);2015年10期
3 范洪彬;孫有平;季瀏;;體質(zhì)測試中力量素質(zhì)評價指標(biāo)與測試方法的國際比較與啟示[J];體育科學(xué);2015年01期
4 李文川;;身體活動建議演變:范式轉(zhuǎn)換與量的積累[J];體育科學(xué);2014年05期
5 張?zhí)煳?;論運(yùn)動減肥的基本內(nèi)容與方法[J];寶雞文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2013年06期
6 周加峰;葉新新;;中等強(qiáng)度有氧和抗阻運(yùn)動對老年Ⅱ型糖尿病患者血液生化指標(biāo)和心肺功能的影響[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報;2011年03期
7 張向陽;胡雁;李奇;胡斌;劉瓊榮;;人力抗阻訓(xùn)練促進(jìn)老年下肢骨折康復(fù)臨床分析[J];遼寧中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年10期
8 馬維平;;高等院校每周一次體育課肌肉力量訓(xùn)練的實驗研究[J];體育科研;2010年05期
9 王歡;鄭迎東;張彥峰;江崇民;;登樓梯能量消耗的測量與統(tǒng)計方法研究[J];中國體育科技;2010年02期
10 胡國鵬;王人衛(wèi);王振;陳壯荔;張劍珍;馮魏;仝二寶;;12周循環(huán)抗阻訓(xùn)練對男子大學(xué)生心血管動力學(xué)參數(shù)的影響[J];中國運(yùn)動醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2010年02期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條
1 李金霞;;2014年國民體質(zhì)監(jiān)測公報發(fā)布[N];中國體育報;2015年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 丁小鑫;青年人群上下樓梯能量消耗特征初探[D];南京體育學(xué)院;2012年
2 劉永智;不同負(fù)重條件下的行走的能耗研究[D];上海體育學(xué)院;2011年
，本文編號：2382268
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2382268.html
最近更新
教材專著
