【摘要】：隨著羽毛球技戰(zhàn)術(shù)的發(fā)展,男子單打比賽更強(qiáng)調(diào)速度以及選手各方面的綜合能力,選手的得分主要來自于后場(chǎng),后場(chǎng)技術(shù)構(gòu)成了整個(gè)技戰(zhàn)術(shù)體系的重要組成部分,后場(chǎng)技戰(zhàn)術(shù)能力的差異決定著選手的整體競(jìng)技能力。其中,后場(chǎng)進(jìn)攻技術(shù)體現(xiàn)羽毛球單打全面、多拍、多變等專項(xiàng)特點(diǎn),是比賽制勝得分的重要手段。本文通過文獻(xiàn)資料法、專家訪談法、錄像觀察法、數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì)法和對(duì)比分析法,對(duì)世界優(yōu)秀羽毛球男子單打運(yùn)動(dòng)員林丹、李宗偉2009年-2014年期間六場(chǎng)重大男子單打比賽進(jìn)行錄像分析,對(duì)他們?cè)诒荣愔羞\(yùn)用的技戰(zhàn)術(shù)進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)分析,目的在于總結(jié)林丹、李宗偉的后場(chǎng)進(jìn)攻技術(shù)運(yùn)用方面的異同點(diǎn),探討這兩位選手近幾年的后場(chǎng)進(jìn)攻技術(shù)的變化和發(fā)展趨勢(shì),旨在為我國(guó)羽毛球男子單打技術(shù)的發(fā)展提供相應(yīng)的理論依據(jù)。研究表明：1)在后場(chǎng)進(jìn)攻技術(shù)的使用中,林丹、李宗偉的吊球使用率均為最高,分別為45%和52%。林丹運(yùn)用點(diǎn)殺和劈殺的次數(shù)較多,李宗偉則運(yùn)用劈殺和重殺的次數(shù)較多。2)后場(chǎng)平高球和吊球雖然被廣泛、高頻次使用,但并不是比賽制勝得分的主要手段,而是間接的利用這兩項(xiàng)進(jìn)攻技術(shù)組合來為殺球創(chuàng)造主要得分機(jī)會(huì)。3)在后場(chǎng)直線進(jìn)攻技術(shù)中,林丹、李宗偉的點(diǎn)殺使用率最高,分別為71.1%和57.2%,劈殺的得分率最高,分別為50.1%和46.4%；在后場(chǎng)中路進(jìn)攻技術(shù)中,兩人的重殺使用率與得分率均為最高；在后場(chǎng)對(duì)角線進(jìn)攻技術(shù)中,林丹、李宗偉的劈殺使用率最高,分別為64.3%和74%,重殺的得分率最高分別為23.5%和17.2%。4)后場(chǎng)進(jìn)攻技術(shù)擊球落點(diǎn)的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,李宗偉在擊球落點(diǎn)、擊球線路方面比林丹更富于變化,說明李宗偉擊球變化手段更多,而林丹雖然變化不如李宗偉多,但得分率并不低,說明林丹的進(jìn)攻實(shí)力更強(qiáng)。5)從后場(chǎng)技術(shù)的綜合分析可知,相比較而言,林丹屬于進(jìn)攻型選手,而李宗偉更擅長(zhǎng)運(yùn)用不同方式的進(jìn)攻方法。兩人的技術(shù)都比較全面,靈活多變是李宗偉后場(chǎng)進(jìn)攻技術(shù)的特點(diǎn),而林丹強(qiáng)大的進(jìn)攻力是其取勝的最大法寶。
[Abstract]:With the development of badminton techniques and tactics, the men's singles competition emphasizes the speed and the comprehensive ability of the players in all aspects. The players' scores mainly come from the backcourt, and the backcourt technology constitutes an important part of the whole technical and tactical system. The difference of the technical and tactical ability in the backcourt determines the overall competitive ability of the players. Among them, the backcourt attack technique reflects the badminton singles all-round, multi-beat, changeable and other special features, which is an important means of winning the game. Based on the methods of literature, expert interview, video observation, data statistics and comparative analysis, this paper deals with Lin Dan, a world elite badminton male singles player. From 2009 to 2014, Li Zongwei made a video analysis of six major men's singles competitions, and analyzed the techniques and tactics they used in the competition, with a view to summing up the similarities and differences in the use of offensive techniques in the backcourt of Lin Dan and Li Zongwei. This paper probes into the changes and development trends of the backcourt offensive techniques of these two players in recent years in order to provide the corresponding theoretical basis for the development of badminton men's singles techniques in China. The results showed that: 1) Lin Dan and Li Zongwei had the highest utilization rate of ball in the backcourt attack technique, which were 45% and 52% respectively. Lin Dan used more points and choppers, while Li Zongwei used more chopping and heavy shootings.) although the backcourt level-high balls and hanging balls are widely used and frequently used, they are not the main means of winning and scoring. But indirectly using the combination of these two offensive techniques to create the main scoring opportunities for killing the ball. 3) in the backcourt straight line attack techniques, Lin Dan and Li Zongwei had the highest utilization rate of point-kill, 71.1% and 57.2%, respectively. The highest score was 50.1% and 46.4%, respectively. In the attack technique in the middle of the backcourt, the utilization rate and scoring rate of the two men were the highest. Among the diagonal attack techniques in the back court, Lin Dan and Li Zongwei had the highest utilization rate of splitting and killing, which were 64.3% and 74%, respectively, and the highest scoring rate of heavy kill was 23.5% and 17.2.4 respectively) the data on the hitting point of the attack technique in the rear court showed that, Li Zongwei has more variety than Lin Dan in terms of batting landing point and stroke route, which shows that Li Zongwei has more means of changing his batting. Although Lin Dan has not changed as much as Li Zongwei, the scoring rate is not low. From the comprehensive analysis of the backcourt technology, we can see that, comparatively speaking, Lin Dan belongs to the offensive player, while Li Zongwei is better at using different attack methods. The technique of both men is comprehensive, flexible and changeable is the characteristic of Li Zongwei's backcourt attack technique, and Lin Dan's powerful offensive power is his greatest magic weapon to win.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京體育大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：G847

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 閆志輝;;對(duì)男單羽毛球運(yùn)動(dòng)員鮑春來的技術(shù)統(tǒng)計(jì)分析[J];赤峰學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2010年09期

2 何年平;;羽毛球男雙高水平比賽得分技術(shù)的研究[J];福建體育科技;2009年03期

3 戴衛(wèi)平;;淺析林丹與李宗偉后場(chǎng)技戰(zhàn)術(shù)的差異性[J];當(dāng)代體育科技;2013年10期

4 項(xiàng)士芳;李帆;;第28屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)我國(guó)隔網(wǎng)對(duì)抗性項(xiàng)群運(yùn)動(dòng)項(xiàng)目成績(jī)分析[J];哈爾濱體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

5 段文義;羽毛球基本技術(shù)教法的突破與創(chuàng)新[J];湖北體育科技;2003年01期

6 黃慧;周志輝;;世界優(yōu)秀羽毛球混合雙打運(yùn)動(dòng)員發(fā)球技戰(zhàn)術(shù)運(yùn)用特征的研究[J];吉林體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

7 王雨;郭立亞;王娟;;費(fèi)德勒發(fā)球與第三拍回球線路的相關(guān)性分析[J];吉林體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

8 汪劍;陳文菁;;羽毛球賽制變革及其影響研究[J];江西教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(綜合);2006年03期

9 代瑩;;2010年尤伯杯決賽女雙比賽技術(shù)分析與評(píng)價(jià)[J];科教導(dǎo)刊(中旬刊);2010年12期

10 寇廣寧;;對(duì)羽毛球男子單打選手技戰(zhàn)術(shù)分析[J];內(nèi)江科技;2011年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王統(tǒng)領(lǐng);運(yùn)動(dòng)項(xiàng)目制勝規(guī)律的理論研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2011年

2 孫志軍;新賽制下林丹與世界優(yōu)秀羽毛球男單選手技戰(zhàn)術(shù)特征對(duì)比分析[D];北京體育大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2338371